G'day,
Let me start by saying that I think everyone agrees you've done an excellent job Peter, nothing I write below is meant to detract from that in any way.
I have a query on how to develop consistent profits. This strategy, like any, works best in certain market conditions and treads water for the rest of the time. This exercise has run for over a year and the bulk of the profits were made in a two month period. That's fine, you can't knock a strategy has made a very good annual return and limited losses during unfavorable periods. I agree it should not be abandoned.
But if for some reason you had been unable to trade for those two months the equity curve would be looking a bit flat. What would be the best way to achieve more consistent profits? I figure you need higher trade frequency if you want more consistency? For the discussion, lets assume you have the capital required to effectively run two systems in parallel. You are looking for consistent returns and accept that you may need to sacrifice some total return to get it. But lets also stick with end of day systems.
- As you've suggested, add more entry opportunities to the same system. This will get you into more trades. But if all ships fall with the tide, won't you still struggle during market downturns?
- Run a different stock system in parallel that works during times this one is flat? Mean reversion maybe? Since you'll need to take capital out of the first system to run the second, the second will need to have a similarly decent annual return and a comparable draw down. We want the second system to compliment the first, not eat away at it.
- Trade other markets. Index CFD's/futures, commodities, forex. This would offer diversification compared to adding more stock trades. It could also offer the advantage of not having to split out so much of your capital. As CFD's/futures are leveraged, most of your capital can remain in the stock system while you add a second system. Total heat of the two systems combined to be considered. However, you would need to be able to trade these different markets successfully and since they behave differently to stocks there's a learning curve in there.
- Pair trading seems to be a way to avoid the affect of overall market conditions. But from what I've seen on this forum, I think successful pair traders are successful because of the work they put into understanding the companies they are trading. Probably not suited to systems traders or pure technical traders.
Thoughts?