Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Artificial Intelligence: AI - The dumb man's way to becoming a genius

Jump to new
Ok last request for the moment. It would be interesting to see how seriously it takes this request.

"Some scientists believe the general scientific views around the cause and consequent effects of global warming are alarmist. What probability is there that these scientists are correct and that the feared effects of global warming do not eventuate ?

What new evidence would have to be discovered to change the current scientific thinking around the causes and effects of global warming "
 
Thanks for opening this topic MoXJo and exploring the capabilities of the program, It certainly will be creating some questions.

The issues we have raised around AGW will almost certainly be raised across thousands of other sites and forums. The question will raised about the answers. Are they right or Right ? And if they aren't Right is the AI entity just another Lefty sock puppet ?

I suspect there will be other topics that will engender similar responses.

Be interested to know what the thinking is in the Right minded forums on the net.
 
basilio said:
Ok last request for the moment. It would be interesting to see how seriously it takes this request.

"Some scientists believe the general scientific views around the cause and consequent effects of global warming are alarmist. What probability is there that these scientists are correct and that the feared effects of global warming do not eventuate ?

What new evidence would have to be discovered to change the current scientific thinking around the causes and effects of global warming "
Click to expand...

Methane emissions from livestock​


What contribution does methane emissions from domestic animals and agriculture ie cows, rice paddy farming make to global warming ? How can these be negated without causing serious food shortages "


Methane emissions from domestic animals and agriculture, such as cows and rice paddy farming, are significant contributors to global warming. Livestock, particularly cows, are responsible for a large portion of methane emissions due to their digestive processes. Rice paddy farming also contributes to methane emissions through the decomposition of organic matter in flooded fields. To reduce these emissions, steps can be taken to improve the efficiency of livestock production and to change farming practices, such as using alternative wetland management techniques in rice paddy farming. Additionally, promoting plant-based diets can also help reduce emissions from the livestock sector. However, care must be taken to ensure that any measures taken do not cause serious food shortages.

" If humanity can't reduce its GG emissions what will be the effects of global warming in the next 50 years ? Please consider melting of Arctic and Antarctic ice caps, loss of glaciers across the world, impact of heat stress on farming and ecosystems including people


If humanity is unable to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, the effects of global warming in the next 50 years are likely to be severe and widespread. Some of the most significant impacts include:
  • Melting of Arctic and Antarctic ice caps: The melting of ice caps and glaciers will cause sea levels to rise, which will lead to increased coastal flooding and erosion. This will threaten low-lying areas and small islands, and displace millions of people.
  • Loss of glaciers across the world: Loss of glaciers will have a number of impacts including reduction of water availability for agriculture, hydropower, and domestic use, and also impact on tourism.
  • Heat stress on farming and ecosystems: Higher temperatures will lead to increased evaporation and water stress, which will make it more difficult to grow crops. This will have a particularly severe impact on small farmers and in developing countries. In addition, the increased heat will also lead to changes in the distribution and behavior of many species, which could cause ecosystems to collapse.
  • Impact on people: The impacts of global warming will be felt most acutely by people in poor and vulnerable communities. Heat waves, floods, and droughts will lead to increased deaths from heat stress and disease, and will also exacerbate poverty and inequality.
Overall the effects of global warming are expected to be devastating for human society and the natural world, and will have far-reaching and long-lasting consequences if we don't take action to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions.

Some scientists believe the general scientific views around the cause and consequent effects of global warming are alarmist. What probability is there that these scientists are correct and that the feared effects of global warming do not eventuate ?


While there is a consensus among scientists that global warming is happening and is primarily caused by human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels, there is still some uncertainty about the specific effects that global warming will have on the earth's climate and ecosystems. Some scientists have raised questions about the accuracy of certain climate models and the potential for natural variability to influence the climate.
It is important to note that the overwhelming majority of scientists in the field of climate research believe that global warming is a serious problem and that human activities are the primary cause. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is made up of scientists from around the world, states that it is extremely likely (95-100% probability) that human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels, are the main cause of global warming since the mid-20th century.
It's hard to quantify the probability of the feared effects of global warming not eventuating, as it depends on the actions that society takes to reduce emissions and also on the potential for negative feedbacks in the climate system. Even if some of the specific predictions of future warming do not come to pass, it is likely that we will still see significant changes in the earth's climate and ecosystems, and that these changes will have serious consequences for human society and the natural world. Therefore, it is essential that we continue to work to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions in order to minimize the risks associated with global warming.

What new evidence would have to be discovered to change the current scientific thinking around the causes and effects of global warming


It is unlikely that any single new discovery would completely change the current scientific understanding of the causes and effects of global warming. The evidence for human-caused global warming, including the observed warming of the earth's surface, the increase in atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, and the observed changes in the earth's climate and ecosystems, is already overwhelming.
However, new evidence and research could potentially refine or add to our understanding of the specific mechanisms by which greenhouse gases are causing the earth to warm, the rate at which the earth will warm in the future, and the specific impacts that global warming will have on different regions of the world.
For example, new research could reveal that feedback mechanisms in the climate system, such as changes in cloud cover, are more complex than previously thought, which could affect the rate of warming. New data on the amount of carbon stored in soils, permafrost, and other parts of the earth's system could give us a more accurate understanding of the carbon cycle, which could help us better predict the rate of warming.
It is also possible that new discoveries in other fields, such as solar physics, could reveal previously unknown natural processes that could be affecting the earth's climate. However, it is important to note that even if new evidence does emerge, it is unlikely to change the overall scientific understanding that human activities are the primary cause of global warming, and that immediate action is needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate the impacts of climate change
 
moXJO said:

Methane emissions from livestock​


What contribution does methane emissions from domestic animals and agriculture ie cows, rice paddy farming make to global warming ? How can these be negated without causing serious food shortages "


Methane emissions from domestic animals and agriculture, such as cows and rice paddy farming, are significant contributors to global warming. Livestock, particularly cows, are responsible for a large portion of methane emissions due to their digestive processes. Rice paddy farming also contributes to methane emissions through the decomposition of organic matter in flooded fields. To reduce these emissions, steps can be taken to improve the efficiency of livestock production and to change farming practices, such as using alternative wetland management techniques in rice paddy farming. Additionally, promoting plant-based diets can also help reduce emissions from the livestock sector. However, care must be taken to ensure that any measures taken do not cause serious food shortages.

" If humanity can't reduce its GG emissions what will be the effects of global warming in the next 50 years ? Please consider melting of Arctic and Antarctic ice caps, loss of glaciers across the world, impact of heat stress on farming and ecosystems including people


If humanity is unable to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, the effects of global warming in the next 50 years are likely to be severe and widespread. Some of the most significant impacts include:
  • Melting of Arctic and Antarctic ice caps: The melting of ice caps and glaciers will cause sea levels to rise, which will lead to increased coastal flooding and erosion. This will threaten low-lying areas and small islands, and displace millions of people.
  • Loss of glaciers across the world: Loss of glaciers will have a number of impacts including reduction of water availability for agriculture, hydropower, and domestic use, and also impact on tourism.
  • Heat stress on farming and ecosystems: Higher temperatures will lead to increased evaporation and water stress, which will make it more difficult to grow crops. This will have a particularly severe impact on small farmers and in developing countries. In addition, the increased heat will also lead to changes in the distribution and behavior of many species, which could cause ecosystems to collapse.
  • Impact on people: The impacts of global warming will be felt most acutely by people in poor and vulnerable communities. Heat waves, floods, and droughts will lead to increased deaths from heat stress and disease, and will also exacerbate poverty and inequality.
Overall the effects of global warming are expected to be devastating for human society and the natural world, and will have far-reaching and long-lasting consequences if we don't take action to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions.

Some scientists believe the general scientific views around the cause and consequent effects of global warming are alarmist. What probability is there that these scientists are correct and that the feared effects of global warming do not eventuate ?


While there is a consensus among scientists that global warming is happening and is primarily caused by human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels, there is still some uncertainty about the specific effects that global warming will have on the earth's climate and ecosystems. Some scientists have raised questions about the accuracy of certain climate models and the potential for natural variability to influence the climate.
It is important to note that the overwhelming majority of scientists in the field of climate research believe that global warming is a serious problem and that human activities are the primary cause. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is made up of scientists from around the world, states that it is extremely likely (95-100% probability) that human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels, are the main cause of global warming since the mid-20th century.
It's hard to quantify the probability of the feared effects of global warming not eventuating, as it depends on the actions that society takes to reduce emissions and also on the potential for negative feedbacks in the climate system. Even if some of the specific predictions of future warming do not come to pass, it is likely that we will still see significant changes in the earth's climate and ecosystems, and that these changes will have serious consequences for human society and the natural world. Therefore, it is essential that we continue to work to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions in order to minimize the risks associated with global warming.

What new evidence would have to be discovered to change the current scientific thinking around the causes and effects of global warming


It is unlikely that any single new discovery would completely change the current scientific understanding of the causes and effects of global warming. The evidence for human-caused global warming, including the observed warming of the earth's surface, the increase in atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, and the observed changes in the earth's climate and ecosystems, is already overwhelming.
However, new evidence and research could potentially refine or add to our understanding of the specific mechanisms by which greenhouse gases are causing the earth to warm, the rate at which the earth will warm in the future, and the specific impacts that global warming will have on different regions of the world.
For example, new research could reveal that feedback mechanisms in the climate system, such as changes in cloud cover, are more complex than previously thought, which could affect the rate of warming. New data on the amount of carbon stored in soils, permafrost, and other parts of the earth's system could give us a more accurate understanding of the carbon cycle, which could help us better predict the rate of warming.
It is also possible that new discoveries in other fields, such as solar physics, could reveal previously unknown natural processes that could be affecting the earth's climate. However, it is important to note that even if new evidence does emerge, it is unlikely to change the overall scientific understanding that human activities are the primary cause of global warming, and that immediate action is needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate the impacts of climate change
Click to expand...

That is good. Again boiler plate stuff but it certainly puts it together well.

Still don't think its the Right answer to the questions.:)
 
So_Cynical said:
No mention of the seaweed fix for methane emissions from cattle.
Click to expand...
Good point. In fact one could certainly find missing ideas. Perhaps more pointed questions and asking for long longer answers.

But the main points were there and put together coherently. It was a very good precis of the main known science.
 
Last edited:
So_Cynical said:
No mention of the seaweed fix for methane emissions from cattle.
Click to expand...
It doesn't seem convinced on the seaweed.

Seaweed Reducing Cattle Methane​

Will seaweed stop methane emissions from cattle


Seaweed has been found to have potential in reducing methane emissions from cattle when added to their feed. Studies have shown that certain species of seaweed can inhibit the microbes in the cow's stomach that produce methane, resulting in a reduction of emissions. However, more research is needed to determine the effectiveness and practicality of this approach on a large scale.

It's shown to work already


Indeed, studies have shown that certain species of seaweed, such as Asparagopsis armata, can significantly reduce methane emissions from cattle when added to their feed. Research has found that Asparagopsis can inhibit the microbes in the cow's stomach that produce methane, resulting in a reduction of emissions by more than 80%. However, while the research has been promising, more studies are needed to determine the most effective way to incorporate seaweed into the diet of cattle on a large scale and any possible negative effects on the animal or the environment before it can be widely adopted as a solution to reduce methane emissions from cattle.
 
moXJO said:
It doesn't seem convinced on the seaweed.

Seaweed Reducing Cattle Methane​

Will seaweed stop methane emissions from cattle


Seaweed has been found to have potential in reducing methane emissions from cattle when added to their feed. Studies have shown that certain species of seaweed can inhibit the microbes in the cow's stomach that produce methane, resulting in a reduction of emissions. However, more research is needed to determine the effectiveness and practicality of this approach on a large scale.

It's shown to work already


Indeed, studies have shown that certain species of seaweed, such as Asparagopsis armata, can significantly reduce methane emissions from cattle when added to their feed. Research has found that Asparagopsis can inhibit the microbes in the cow's stomach that produce methane, resulting in a reduction of emissions by more than 80%. However, while the research has been promising, more studies are needed to determine the most effective way to incorporate seaweed into the diet of cattle on a large scale and any possible negative effects on the animal or the environment before it can be widely adopted as a solution to reduce methane emissions from cattle.
Click to expand...
Ok so its a lot like google in that you have to use the right key words, once you do all good, the above seaweed right up is accurate and contains enough detail to pass as well informed, strange that the IA missed the relevance of Asparagopsis seaweed in the first place.
 
So_Cynical said:
Ok so its a lot like google in that you have to use the right key words, once you do all good, the above seaweed right up is accurate and contains enough detail to pass as well informed, strange that the IA missed the relevance of Asparagopsis seaweed in the first place.
Click to expand...
If you do asked super detailed questions it will give better answers.
 
Once again just the basics this is from elai.
It's an ai of the above cagf essay.
 
Nugenesis Artificial Intelligence

So this is a crypto trading AI. It allegedly can predict price movements of cryptocurrencies Bitcoin and Ethereum four hours ahead with 99.9 per cent accuracy.

Or they could just be ramping.
 
ChatGPT is being banned in NSW public schools. Not sure how internet access works at school these days but sounds like a hard thing to police when every kid has a smartphone/ipad/notebook and you do homework - at home.

The reason why it's probably not going to work for any student wanting it to write essays for them is the uni/school AI already in place that scans essays and identifies likely plagiarism.

I can't see how stopping the use of this tech is a long term good plan or even how it's controllable.

Is this a Skynet coming on-line moment? Getting close.
 
Something to examine ... closely

1674465340797.png

 
ABC has extended story on how AI is already being used in Law Firms, Architectural firms and IT.

It works well. Not perfectly but easily beats the 80/20 rule.

www.abc.net.au

For these Australian companies, AI isn't the future of work — it's already here

While schools are banning ChatGPT, Australian workplaces are already deploying it and other new artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Here's how they're using them.
www.abc.net.au www.abc.net.au
 
It would be interesting to see how an AI entity behaved on a website like ASF. (Or anywhere else for that matter). What parameters could be set for its research? How would it behave in interactions ? What language style would it use ? Would it be adapative to different responses ?

Would anyone else realise it was AI ?

How long before this happens - if it hasn't already ?
 
Oh boy, am I going to have fun with this thing

Q:Write an explanation of stock option delta in the style of The Tao Te Ching

A: Delta is the way of the option,
ever-changing, like the flow of a river.
It measures the movement of the stock,
and guides the trader in his decision.

As the stock rises, delta grows strong,
and the option gains in value.
But if the stock falls, delta weakens,
and the option loses its worth.

The wise trader watches delta closely,
for it reveals the path of the stock.
He does not cling to one option,
but flows with the market's ebb and flow.

Delta is not a fixed thing,
but a constantly shifting force.
Embrace its movement,
and you will find success in the market.
Deny its power,
and you will suffer loss.

This is the Tao of Delta,
ever-changing, ever-powerful.
Understand it, and you will find harmony in the market.
 

Similar threads

StudentTrader
Investing in Artificial Intelligence (AI)
3 4 5
Replies
86
Views
11K
Dona Ferentes
Dona Ferentes
basilio
How valuable are two parent families?
2
Replies
28
Views
3K
Value Collector
Value Collector
mullokintyre
The threat of US as a Superpower
2
Replies
22
Views
1K
Knobby22
Knobby22
StudentTrader
What are the two main types of market analysis and how can we combine them?
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
tech/a
tech/a
T
What will be the gold?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Craton
Craton
Top