Dona Ferentes
Abrió la caja, vio al gatito, y sonrió
- Joined
- 11 January 2016
- Posts
- 15,587
- Reactions
- 21,194
risk on
interesting , normally not on my watch-list for the reasons you mentionedMy first target for that would be $6. I know nothing of their Alinta acquisition and future prospects obviously.
APA also on top of bass link already owns the electricity link between QLD-NSW and VIC-SAOne of my picks for the 2024 trading competition.
Reasons for choosing it being the share price is near the bottom of a trading range that's gone sideways since early 2015, so almost 9 years now.
Plus the fundamental, albeit speculative with the timing, that governments are going to have to put serious effort into energy infrastructure before too much longer and in that regard APA is reasonably well placed in regard to four potential opportunities:
1. Moving gas from distant source (Qld, NT, WA) to the south-eastern states where supply shortages are developing.
2. Moving gas between other states and Victoria, noting the seeming reluctance to ship LNG into Vic whilst there's much greater enthusiasm for that concept in NSW and SA.
3. Gas-fired electricity generation noting APA has an essentially shovel ready project at Dandenong (Melbourne).
4. As a potential investor into electricity transmission, most significantly and obviously between Victoria and Tasmania noting that APA has acquired the existing link.
Those are all somewhat speculative and heavily dependent on political decisions but it's plausible APA could benefit from them.
Hahaha, I just had a look back at the conversation I had with Luutzu, Man he is a good bloke but damn he is so cynical, Hahaha.Just rechecked this thread. I noticed that VC had done some indepth analysis on APA and believes it offers good long term value.
Offers much food for thought as another investment. Thanks
|
I basically consider APA to be an inflation hedged bond in some respects, where part of the bonds coupon is reinvested each year to make the bond face value grow.Because APA has high earnings visibility, for a long time the pricing followed bond prices closely, it's a very common relationship in the Utilities sector.
View attachment 169414
after COVID the relationship was disrupted as bond yields rose dramatically while APA got a bid on (I assume) equity beta and energy exposure
View attachment 169415
After APA caught down to bonds and more recently the relationship seems to be re-asserting itself as uncertainty about APA earning visibility reduces
View attachment 169416
Some valid questions:
- is the future going to be like the past and APA retain its spot as biggest bond proxy on the ASX? If so what's your view on long duration?
- is the future going to be less like the past and more like the inflationary shock period of 2021/2022?
As APA is one of the S&P ASX 50 stocks, if you have a CommSec account you can access the Morningstar Premium report on them for free which has some good analysis IMHO.
One of my picks for the 2024 trading competition.
Reasons for choosing it being the share price is near the bottom of a trading range that's gone sideways since early 2015, so almost 9 years now.
Plus the fundamental, albeit speculative with the timing, that governments are going to have to put serious effort into energy infrastructure before too much longer and in that regard APA is reasonably well placed in regard to four potential opportunities:
1. Moving gas from distant source (Qld, NT, WA) to the south-eastern states where supply shortages are developing.
2. Moving gas between other states and Victoria, noting the seeming reluctance to ship LNG into Vic whilst there's much greater enthusiasm for that concept in NSW and SA.
3. Gas-fired electricity generation noting APA has an essentially shovel ready project at Dandenong (Melbourne).
4. As a potential investor into electricity transmission, most significantly and obviously between Victoria and Tasmania noting that APA has acquired the existing link.
Those are all somewhat speculative and heavily dependent on political decisions but it's plausible APA could benefit from them.
Back in 2008, after being steadily smashed during the GFC, I was able to buy a bunch of APA at under $3 paying a 10% dividend, it was a great time. Now might be a similar opportunity.This has been smashed the past 2 years. Around 8 bucks might be a bottom. Maybe.
I wonder if SMR's are a chance down the track.
Or, Twigger might buy it.
View attachment 169758
yes that debt ( and it's acquisitive nature , rather than reducing that debt ) kept me at arm's lengthI get that APA has very stable revenues and earnings but it has around $11 billion in long term debt compared to shareholders equity of less than $2 billion and operating cash flow of $1.2 billion it seems like the debt is on the high side.
Also dividends are only partially franked.
But apart from those two negatives it overall seems to be a good business and is trading at a reasonable price.
Shareholders equity only appears low because of accelerated write off of assets, and franking credits are low because they don’t pay much tax because of the accelerated write offs.I get that APA has very stable revenues and earnings but it has around $11 billion in long term debt compared to shareholders equity of less than $2 billion and operating cash flow of $1.2 billion it seems like the debt is on the high side.
Also dividends are only partially franked.
But apart from those two negatives it overall seems to be a good business and is trading at a reasonable price.
I think you are misunderstanding that style of business, if you have regulated income, that rises along with inflation and interest rates, it’s silly to not use long term debt.yes that debt ( and it's acquisitive nature , rather than reducing that debt ) kept me at arm's length
As one of my picks for the 2024 competition, thus far it's a "yellow light".This has been smashed the past 2 years. Around 8 bucks might be a bottom. Maybe.
OK but regulators and regulations changeI think you are misunderstanding that style of business, if you have regulated income, that rises along with inflation and interest rates, it’s silly to not use long term debt.
Also, if you tried to pay down debt to much the regulators would be upset, because their pricing formulas means they would have to pay to more. Because the cost of capital is built into the price they allow you to charge your customers, and if you use to much of your own equity It’s more expensive for the consumer.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.