This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

And we are off - Aboriginal leaders say $1 billion 'not sorry enough'

Because that would make you a racist whitefella that just isnt sorry enough.

Ah dear, oh well, it really doesn't bother me when someone calls me white. But its the opposite with Blacks. They get so offensive and call racism, in Australia and other politically correct countries anyway.

I lived in Fiji for 7 years, there are no problems there, call each other whites, blacks, nobody takes offence.
 

Africans are the same...white people are white and blacks are black.

Its a non issue there, and makes the whole black and white thing so much easyer...
 
This arguement that the people removing these children from thier families really believed they were doing the right thing, just doesn't wash.
Do you think Adolf Hitler would have done what he did if he didn't truly believe it was the right thing to do.
 
Ah dear, oh well, it really doesn't bother me when someone calls me white. But its the opposite with Blacks. They get so offensive and call racism, in Australia and other politically correct countries anyway.
.

Thats just dribble, you could always pick a minority whinge like that out of any ethnic group.

An Aboriginal being called a Blackfella is probably one of the mildest hardships they have had to deal with in there lives.

I'd say a fair lump of youre politically correct chums would lose the fella and coin up cxxx!.
 

Not an appropriate comparison.

Hitler exterminated Jews because he regarded them as essentially vermin.
He wasn't trying to improve their outcomes!
 

Julia
The point of the sorry march was simply that - to START the healing process.

I would simply say that we are discussing the need to say "sorry".
I think it is something that must be done.
I think you will find that the Abs think it is something that must be done.
I think you will find several bureaucrats trying to work out the wording as we speak.


I think you are missing the point.

As for the second third etc steps. I have said numerous times that these people need a chance for gainful employment. Whether this means that factories are set up nearby to them where no tax is applicable ( as per the red indians in USA) etc etc - options tobe discussed elsewhere.

But if you are saying that to say sorry is a hollow and /or meaningless emotional issue - I would counter that the point of all this is going over your head.

Read some of the articles where abs insisit on the word sorry as an essential first step. Listen to the Redfern address. You might start to understand.
 

Unfortunately it is the Aboriginal representatives that have disappointed. They consistently stated this had nothing to do with compensation. What are they doing now.

If the court of law applied this consistently and also paid out for the convicts (some their biggest crime stealing a loaf of bread to feed a family) and to the many children removed from families in Britain and Ireland post war and brought here then some form of parity may silence me.

I often wonder how the "stolen generation" people would have turned out were they not "stolen". If you honestly believe those poor children are better off living in the hunger and squaller they do with violent, sexually abusing drunken parents then I would be amased. If you have seen this then go into the Pilbara, Kalgoorlie and suburbs of Lockridge you will be disgusted with the way these people treat their own children.

I say do it again as some of them clearly do not give a damn for these poor kids.

Note I am tarring all with the same brush, as I said I have good long term Noogyar friends. They to are pissed off with the way these children are treated by their own.

But let's just pay out many more millions to a select group who have done nothing with the many millions they have already squandered publicly. Give these children support by all means but don't give anymore to people who just go and buy more booze and destroy their own families and culture.
 
My post didn't refer to saying sorry. I haven't objected to that.
Nothing you have said here addresses my questions about compensation payments or sexual violence.
 

Not a word about looking for employment.

Suppose savings made on not smashed homes and reduced number of police deployment to violent incidents will be enough saving for taxpayers.


This alone shows how sorry we are already.
 
My post didn't refer to saying sorry. I haven't objected to that.
Nothing you have said here addresses my questions about compensation payments or sexual violence.


julia thought for the day ...
suppose some kids were perfectly happy UNTIL they were stolen -
and only THEN did the abuse start?
 
julia thought for the day ...
suppose some kids were perfectly happy UNTIL they were stolen -
and only THEN did the abuse start?

C'mon 20/20 we've had a good day today why did you have to dig this one up again. For christ sake I'm sorry:
 
C'mon 20/20 we've had a good day today why did you have to dig this one up again. For christ sake I'm sorry:
Me too. Sorry, sorry, sorry. End of the matter.


P.S. All claims for compensation to:

Santa
C/- ??????
Greenland (or Alaska or somewhere like that)
 
Julia and others ....
Since you (and disarray and others) always assume (obviously without the slightest hint of research) that things improved for these kids - here are some stats I found in a very cursory search ...

Children's stories.... (this could go on for many many posts - I'll cover institutions in a second post)

Totality of separation
....... Many children were told they were unwanted, rejected or that their parents were dead.

Children were given the very strong impression their parents were worthless.
 
Julia
If you're ever in WA go to the museum
........ An Aboriginal witness to the Inquiry in Perth who taught in the school at Moore River during the 1950s gave evidence that inmates were flogged with a cat-o'-nine-tails (now held in the WA Museum) (confidential evidence 681).

Here are some notes about the saintly white-run institutions
...
next post will cover some for the sexual abuse.
I got told my Aboriginality when I got whipped and they'd say, `You Abo, you ******'. That was the only time I got told my Aboriginality.
Confidential evidence 139, Victoria: removed 1967.

Institutional conditions
The living conditions in children's institutions were often very harsh.


The physical infrastructure of missions, government institutions and children's homes was often very poor and resources were insufficient to improve them or to keep the children adequately clothed, fed and sheltered. WA's Chief Protector, A O Neville, later described the conditions at the Moore River Settlement in the 1920s (Neville had no control over the Settlement from 1920 until 1926, his jurisdiction being limited to the State's north during that period).




........ An Aboriginal witness to the Inquiry in Perth who taught in the school at Moore River during the 1950s gave evidence that inmates were flogged with a cat-o'-nine-tails (now held in the WA Museum) (confidential evidence 681).


Conditions in other children's institutions are also remembered as harsh. Melbourne law firm Phillips Fox summarised the experience reported by their clients.


Institutional regimes were typically very strictly regulated.



In some cases administrators were admonished for their treatment of inmates or residents. Former WA Chief Protector, A O Neville, described in his 1947 book some of the treatments meted out by his staff at the Moore River Settlement.

Verbal complaints and formal petitions were dismissed by one superintendent who told the commissioner, `the natives generally feel that they must always have some complaints when you visit them' (quoted by Haebich 1982 on page 59).


In 1927 Mrs Curry, a former employee at Cootamundra Girls' Home in NSW, alleged that girls had been `flogged, slashed with a cane etc etc

In 1935 the NSW Aborigines Protection Board commissioned a report on the conduct of the manager of Kinchela Boys' Home following receipt of allegations of insobriety and ill-treatment of the boys. Upon consideration of the report late in that year, the Board determined to `strongly advise' the manager `to give up taking intoxicating liquor entirely' particularly when in the company of the boys and to inform him `that on no account must he tie a boy up to a fence or tree, or anything else of that nature, to inflict punishment on him, that such instruments as lengths of hosepipe or a stockwhip must not be used in chastising a boy, that no dietary punishments shall be inflicted on any inmate in the Home'. (NSW Aborigines Protection Board Minutes of Meetings, 4 December 1935).


Almost 1 in every five (19%) Inquiry witnesses who spent time in an institution reported having been physically assaulted there.
 
Sexual abuse
Children in every placement were vulnerable to sexual abuse and exploitation. The following table indicates the placements in which Inquiry witnesses for whom the information could be extracted report having experienced sexual assaults. It should be noted that witnesses were not asked whether they had had this experience and that there are many reasons, personal and procedural, for deciding against volunteering the information.


Sexual assaults reported by Inquiry witnesses
Placement ....... Males (reported)... (not reported) ...... Females (reported) ... (not reported)


Institution ..... 10 (8.5%)..... (91.5%) ........... 19 (11.7%) ...... 144 (88.3%)

Foster family ..... 5 (10%) ...... 45 (90%) ..... 21 (29.6%) .... 50 (70.4%)

Adoptive family .... 1 (4.8%) .... 20 (95.2%) ..... 6 (27.3%) .... 16 (72.7%)

Work ... 0 ( - ) .... 19 (100%) .... 4 (10.5%) .... 34 (89.5%)

Total .... 16 (7.7%) .... 192 (92.3%) ... 50 (17.0%) ... 244 (83.0%)


Girls were more at risk than boys. For girls in particular the risk of sexual assault in a foster placement was far greater than in any other.


Almost one in ten boys and just over one in ten girls allege they were sexually abused in a children's institution.


...... These were the things that were done ... It was seen to be the white man's way of lookin' after you. It never happened with an Aboriginal.
Confidential evidence 340, Western Australia: man removed in the 1930s to Sister Kate's Orphanage.




etc etc


Julia
yep - sure was a healthy system that stolen generation stuff..

And You expect me to answer you on current abuse ...

and meanwhile you think you don't have to answer my question -
e) Why were kids had been taken from loving families
f) sometimes with the father in active service
g) only to be treated like that !!

Then of course there was the church ....



One in ten boys and three in ten girls allege they were sexually abused in a foster placement or placements.


One in ten girls allege they were sexually abused in a work placement organised by the Protection Board or institution. Other exploitation was known and condemned, but not prevented. By 1940 the NSW Board's record with respect to Aboriginal girls placed in service was well-known and even condemned in Parliament.


In WA even the Chief Protector himself recognised the sufferings of many of the children he had placed `in service'.

this just goes on and on ...
It reads like a bludy nightmare.



.....

etc etc
sickening !
but sure - you people happily defend it


......... in your ignorance.
 
2020, I don't need to read the mountains of quotes, thanks. I have never disputed that horrific abuse occurred. It also occurred to white children in institutions.

You don't seem to be able to comprehend my position on this so I will be very patient and try to explain once again.

1. I am happy for the govt to say sorry. Say anything they like that will stop the living in the past and allow us to move on to a more constructive future.

2. I am also happy for compensation to be paid if that were to mean they decided in response to take responsibility for abusing their own children.
I am utterly fed up with the expectation that "the gummint'" needs to fix everything. Individuals , all of us, need to take responsiblity for our own behaviour, and indigenous communities collectively need to stop wallowing in the blame game and do something about the grossly dysfunctional abuse which abounds. I don't care, at this stage, what the cause is.

Many of us have been physically, sexually and emotionally abused as children, and/or as adults. That does not give us licence to perpetuate the violence and fail to seek change.

3. I am not happy for compensation to be paid if it is simply going to be spent on grog, four wheel drive vehicles, etc etc. This is why I asked you how you thought any compensation should be paid and what it should be expected to achieve.

In other words, what outcomes do you expect saying "sorry" and/or paying compensation will achieve?
Very simple question.
I think it's now the fourth time I have asked it.
Too hard?
 
See, to take kids away, and then ignore their plight, even put them in institutions and use cat-of-9-tails on em …. doesn’t quite sound like good intentions to me.

being all emotional and going on about stealing children doesn't really look at the big picture which is where things need to be viewed. anyway if some aboriginal communities were as bad then as they are now we should steal another bloody generation.
Those stats back there for the stolen kids are worse than current.
So what’s the big picture disarray – going out and beating the snot out of em ?



Julia –first step is to say sorry. If the courts so deem it, then compensation as well. There was a time when the majority of Australians wanted to say sorry. Then of course Johnny Howard managed to pour acid all over it, and it ended in a racial mess.

How will the money help – as if you or I have the right to tell them hw they spend their money . ! – buy a house! – send their kids to university ! whatever they like obviously.

Julia said:
What would be your answer to "stealing" some of the current generation of children rather than leave then vulnerable to further sexual violence within their own communities?
Julia, since 30% of stolen girls in foster homes were sexually abused – )and the same in adoptive homes incidentally) - and by comparison, you can count the number of child sex abuse cases found in the latest intervention on the fingers of a leper’s hand – then your question doesn’t make sense does it !! ??

then of course there was the “boy in the suitcase” incident recently, where I think I argued police and/or DoCS should have intervened, don’t think you backed me up on that occasion- as I recall. But I concede that’s another story


Malevolence? – mmm, cat of 9 tails has gotta be getting close .

Julia - try reading some of those quotes - but better still , go to that website - because there are many many more such stories.

That is the evidence in all this.

Your conjecture about how they were treated - well to be honest , it's inaccurate.

Since the basic tenet in your argument falls over , so does the rest of your argument. so try to read some of those stories.

This is not about speculating about how they'll spend their money - it's about righting a wrong.

Some of those stories are recent. I was 20 + years old when they were still being stolen and whipped in institutions. Makes me sick.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/special/rsjproject/rsjlibrary/hreoc/stolen/

What outcome will saying sorry achieve? - like I said, it will start to address the injustice - start to mend the racial mess we are in - recognise that these people were SERIOUSLY badly treated - and go partway to compensating the individuals involved.

Sadly only a token gesture (whether or not it is "sorry", or "sorry plus compensation")
 
3. I am not happy for compensation to be paid if it is simply going to be spent on grog, four wheel drive vehicles, etc etc. This is why I asked you how you thought any compensation should be paid and what it should be expected to achieve.
I think this issue is quite a beat up. Judges simply don't give compo out if there is any hint of alcoholism. In my personal experience, and of seeing a lot of other people's compensation claims (my clients), the most absurd things get trotted out, and are usually reasons for a reduction or non payment of compensation. In my case, one of the reasons they didn't want to pay up, was because I had been horse whipped by police at a war protest. F*ck knows what that has to do with someone going through a stop sign, and f*ck knows how they even found that out! All I was after was medical expenses.

To get any sort of compensation, judges will look at many things. If you have any drug or alcohol problems, you wont get anything. If you have a checkered employment history, it will reduce it significantly. If you can't prove you have attempted to get help for the problems complained about, or shown financial hardship for trying to access these things, you wont get anything. I doubt many of these people who want compensation will fit the criteria needed. But if they have, if they have a decent employment history, have sort help, don't have alcohol or drug problems, then I'd say most people here would be pretty compassionate towards that.

But I've said this previously. Compensation wont solve anything. Because no doubt, many will fail the criteria above, and wont get anything. And then of course you have the claims of a racist justice system etc etc. But yeah, even smokers will have compensation payments reduced. The level that some of these get down to is really crazy when you hear about them fairly regularly. And I think in previous cases, stolen generation compensation claims have been thrown out of court.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...