This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

"Alternative" Therapies

Hi Soft Dough,

You stated earlier that the majority of alternative medicines only work due to the placebo affect. You also asked what clinically proven natural medicines would be prescribed for high cholesterol. I did not know, so I endeavoured to find out...

Policosanol - Canetti M, Moreira M, Mas R, et al. A two-year study on the efficacy and tolerability of policosanol in patients with type II hyperlipoproteinaemia. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res 1995;15:159-65.

Artichoke - Pittler MH, Thompson CO, Ernst E. Artichoke leaf extract for treating hypercholesterolaemia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;3:CD003335

Niacin (Vitamin B3) - McKenney J. New perspectives on the use of niacin in the treatment of lipid disorders. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:697-705.

Blonde Psyllium - Anderson JW, Allgood LD, Lawrence A, et al. Cholesterol-lowering effects of psyllium intake adjunctive to diet therapy in men and women with hypercholesterolemia: meta-analysis of 8 controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71:472-9.
 

Gav, those headings of trials don't allow access to them, so - whilst it's appreciated that you have found them - just the headings are pretty meaningless.

For all we know they might have consisted of a non-randomised sample of six people. We don't know what controls they used, or anything about how the trials were conducted.

Perhaps you could post again with an actual link to the methodology.
 
Out of curiosity I googled the first trial listed.
Here is the abstract. Doesn't exactly sing the praises of the product, does it!

 
And the second study, on Artichoke leaf extract:

 
Although a bit vague, this one seems more valid. But still little different from the standard advice that fibre in the diet will assist in controlling cholesterol.


I couldn't find anything on the Niacin suggestion.
 

Julia, I understand the point you are making. Those references I listed are from text books, so I can't provide links. I guess it doesn't matter if there were 5,000 random subjects in a controlled environment.. They could have thrown out 5 failed tests before publishing the successful ones - just as the drug companies are currently allowed to... More regulation is required all round...
 
Excuse the coarseness, but it is really starting to sound to me like the old "polishing a turd" effect now.

When you have such a poor base as alternative treatments do, you can try to polish it with selective bits of information and misinformation, but at the end of the day, it's still a methodology with a poor base. Claiming traditional medicine also has a poor base does not make your poor base any better.

If anything, this thread has made me accept that while natural products may have some therapeutic value, it confirms in my mind alternative medicine stumbles across them by accident, not by research or design, and continues to be a dangerous, haphazard risk.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...