- Joined
- 2 October 2006
- Posts
- 3,043
- Reactions
- 2
Good to see you are still giving us the benefit of your research.Agentm said:yeah.. living on the edge..
look forward to seeing what news comes out this weekend.. my feeling is that there will more of the same.. gas shows that is!!
after looking at the details of the expectations of this well. its been 100% spot on.. texas crude has found gas in all zones they went for.. now for the next 1500' of sands
IMHO
and DYOR
Nice post there must be intense pressure @20000ft so gas shows down equate to big bucks on the surface.I'm impressed.The Snorkler said:Hello, I have been reading this forum with great interest. I am a former Arc employee and a long term Adelphi Energy shareholder (all staff got an allocation in the float - no discount though!) so am quite excited about this well.
As for the significance of the shows - a positive thing is the depth and pressure of the Hosston formation. Gas is highly compressible so that smaller intervals at greater depths translates to higher volumes once it is produced to surface and depressurised to standard conditions. Thats the great thing about producing from deep gas formations. Using first principles - roughly if you double the pressure (i.e. depth) you will double or triple the volume at standard conditions. Not accounting for any overpressuring of the formation.
So Im vary encouraged and holding on until they well test and determine deliverability and reserves at which case we will be rewarded or go down in flames. I recall there is plenty of gas locked up in tight Perth Basin formations that Arc discovered and havent been able to develop yet.
Cheers!
-----------------------------Broadside said:yeah that is an interesting point...I will treat it as a positive because Adelphi indicated they wouldn't bother to update the market about shows that weren't potentially commercial...so that is 3 potentially economic shows in the primary target...but I do see your point.
But anyway, Hosston is the bonus for me, I think the Austin chalks secondary will more than justify a much higher share price than we see today.Have a good one.
-----------------------------------------------------------austrader02 said:Snorkler,
You are right on the money there mate and great post. By the way ppl i got an email from a mate after a long time and he said are you posting on aussie forums as you sound like this guy.... and i was like yes. I told him i am austrader02 and he said he is snorkler. We both are in UK...what a small world! Both ex-ARC.
Anyways, i agree with Agent M that this forum is gettin better and we all should pool our knowledge on this share and others if possible. In regards to Freddies email, i do agree the post by couch which suggested gas in 18000s range was not posted by ADI in their release. The question is does that mean that the partners feel it is insiginificant, dont want to hype it up until well-test or somone put a bogus couch release. I think couch email should be taken with care, espcially on weekends as someone might be trying to ramp up the share for monday trading!
The Strachan Report calculated that a 30 m net pay zone over only half the mapped target size (40km²) and 10% porosity could deliver 1.7 Tcf.The Snorkler said:It is just one factor in favour for this well. Also important is lateral extent as that other fellow mentioned. I think in the Strachan report they were looking for 28 m net pay x 40 km² or thereabouts in the Hosston to delineate a 800 Bcf resource.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?