Hartleys Update:
http://www.adelphienergy.com.au/files/brokerreports/Hartleys Broker Report 26 March 2010.pdf
ADELPHI ENERGY LTD
What happened?
Adelphi Energy has reported sustained average 30 day flow rates from its
first two wells at its Sugarloaf project onshore USA. The Kennedy #1H well
has averaged 11.7 million cubic feet of gas equivalent per day* (“mmcfe/d”)
and the Weston #1H well has recorded average 30 day production of
11.4mmcfe/d. These results have been achieved without the benefit of
installation of production tubing, which has been indicated in nearby wells to
result in a decrease in initial decline.
The Company has also reported that it now has three additional wells in the
process of being drilled or fracture stimulated.
ADI is free carried through the current work program.
What does it mean?
At these rates, we estimate that each well is making US$50k-US$65k in
revenue per day, with combined revenue from both wells grossing estimated
US$3-4m in the first 30 days. We calculate that the average gas /
condensate production per well is 3.75 million cubic feet of gas per day with
615 barrels of condensate per day (flow rates will decline significantly in the
first year). With well costs estimated at US$6-8m, payback should be
achieved within 5-8 months.
It is still early days; however, each piece of new information received to date
has increased the potential of the play and estimated ultimate recovery per
well is now likely to be significantly greater than 5 billion cubic feet of gas
equivalent. To give an indication of potential value, there could be over 200
well locations on the Sugarloaf acreage, resulting in over 1 trillion cubic feet
of gas equivalent. We estimate that Adelphi’s share of this at current spot
prices (US$80 oil, US$4 gas) is worth ~150cps (using US$2 per mcfe
calculated net present value and 10% working interest post farmout).
At US$100 oil, the valuation potential increases to over 200cps.
Strong newsflow is expected over the next 2-3 months as the additional 3
wells are completed, fracture stimulated and flow tested. Now that the
technical risk has been decreased due to a substantial number of successful
wells being drilled in the play, we view these wells as very low risk (90%
chance of success).
Hartleys Initial View
We recently upgraded ADI to a Buy based on the initial flow rates received
from its first two wells and consistent information from wells in the
surrounding acreage. This new information has increased our confidence in
the potential of the resource and we re-iterate our Buy recommendation and
short term price target of 45cps.
If initial results from the next three wells (expected over the next 2-3 months)
continue to be strong, there is substantial room in our valuation
for further large upgrades in price target and valuation, as indicated by
our unrisked valuation of 188cps.
*mcfe is calculated using a 12:1 conversion ratio for gas / condensate
and a 25% uplift in gas equivalent volume due to high calorific value
of the produced gas
That's pretty comical for the JVP to blame only two forums for the entire knowledge of what people know. This being in a region funded by oilfield economics to begin with. Word gets out. My comment to the JVP is this........can you picture a bunch of 60-80 year old ranchers and landowners sitting around tooling on the internet ? No. They're out haying and feeding cows. Word gets out no matter what you do. It's always been like that. Discretion is only going to work so far until the game heats up. For example, one of my lease offers presented thier Eagle Ford project at an investor's convention. After their offer to me I simply go to the energy company's website and find their recent plays and their projections for future plays. It would be foolish to blame a public forum for info that is already out there for anyone to find.
Perhaps just blame the internet in general. That would be more fair. The invention of the internet has changed persuasion of politics, negotiating knowledge for car sales, knwoledge of who you are dating, and knowledge of healthcare to find out if your doctor is doing a good job or not. Tell the JVP that the oilfield is not exempt from the way the internet has changed the world either.
ADI and holding.
Are these for real numbers?...I went back to the RRC...no production has been reported there on the Weston....I posted the plot of the Kennedy 1H DAILY RATES..the RRC reports MONTHLY GAS in mcf / CONDENSATE in barrels.....the average day rate for Jan 2010 was: 667 mcf and 120 bc. At your $80 /BO and $4/mcf thats $12,268 per day, or $380,308 per month in Jan 2010 / NRI 75% = $210,231 net to payout $6M in 28 months.....what wrong with the numbers??? The bottom scale in years ...Jan 2010 is the last data point posted.
It's reasonably small volume, maybe a small number of people have just decided to sell on the speculation, or maybe some people are sticking to old plans about selling on the speculation rather than the result, or maybe a couple of investors lost their day jobs and need the money at any cost, or just bought houses and need to raise funds for deposits, or maybe some people think the results in a few weeks won't be as good as generally anticipated, or maybe the market is just being its usual weird self and not making sense.
Very likely, there will be lots of people nervous about holding and eager to sell, because keep in mind a lot of people bought in below 20c and anything could set them off to lock in profits. I bought in under 20c, but for better or worse topped up recently at just under 30, despite human psychology urging the opposite.
Or maybe it's most likely that the market is responding to Agentm's April entry for the ASF stock tipping competition.
Seems like an exciting time to me, and I'm happy to be holding right now.
lol
i doubt anyone reads anything into stock market comps. i was looking for a long shot there..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?