"This is the first of a number of Block A wells that were having work commencing in December to be brought back on to production".
============================================================
Only 3 wells have been on production ("...brought back on to..."): Kunde 3 (which is what the RNS was about), Baker 1 and Baker 2.
Taking Kelly's words at face value, he appears to be saying that the Baker twins have also had "work" done to them. Previously, we had been informed that they were being hooked up to the new infrastructure. But Kelly has mentioned "work" in the context of the "work" done to Kunde 3, which was fracture stimulation. So, does he mean to say that the Baker twins have been fracture stimulated also? Or have they just been cleaned up after being shut in?
The reason for labouring this point is that Baker 2 was completed with a slotted liner, as Kowalik, so a successful fracture stimulation operation will be of considerable interest and Baker 1 may not have been completed at all:
"...Workover operations commenced on 29 January 2008. The operator was forced to leave in the open hole a fish made up of a length of 2 7/8” tubing and a 5 7/8” rock bit. It is permanently lodged in the horizontal part
of the open hole in the interval 12,676 ft to 13,097 ft...." (EME Report for y/e 31 March 2008).
The latest RNS also only reported the new fracture stimulation of the 1.800ft not previously stimulated.
quattro44, who appears to have drilling experience, had this to say about the 900 ft previously fracture stimulated:
===========================================================
"quattro44 - 13 Nov'08 - 20:38 - 44775 of 44793
Jacko. In may they only did a small acid frac over 5 small intervals of perforations (Maybe 10 feet each or so) along a 900 foot section. This would only have the effect of literally cleaning up the formation in the area of the perforations. i.e. not really a frac at all but more like a high pressure acid job. Now, they are obviously proposing to perforate a much larger section and hydraulically frac the lot. Serious stuff. look out!
q44"
===========================================================
Going back to the EME 2008 report:
==========================================================
"Gas shows were encountered over the whole horizontal length of approximately 2,500 ft. Multiple gas flares measuring up to 65’ were recorded over approximately a 1,000 ft horizontal length, including an interval of about 600 ft that produced a constant gas flare..."
==========================================================
So, was the 900ft section chosen for the acid treatment that initially produced "...an average gas flow of 2.5mmcfgpd accompanied by 950 bcpd and no water through a 14/64” choke..." that 1,000 ft section that produced multiple flares?
The reason for labouring this point is that Kowalik was reported as having similar flaring over at least part of the 1,500 ft or so 'drilled in the right horizon'. If Burlington has re-worked that 900 ft of Kunde 3 and if it is now
producing as it did before immediately after the acid clean up, that could have implications for the potential for Kowalik.
This is all speculation until EME reports the full flow results for the 3 wells and provides further information on the "work" done.