- Joined
- 5 August 2021
- Posts
- 362
- Reactions
- 794
Index Fund Name | Weighting |
Vanguard Australia Property Securities Index ETF (VAP) | 33% |
BetaShares Australia 200 ETF (A200) | 33% |
Vanguard Diversified Balanced Index ETF (VDBA) | 33% |
Hi all,
A little about me - I am in my early 20s earning ~$100k a year and am seeking feedback on what people thing of my plan.
The Plan:
I was originally looking at potentially negatively gearing some shares i.e. $20k of a safe blue chip stock however came to realize that I am likely better off just reducing my taxable income by meeting the maximum super contribution ($27,500 atm due to increase to $30,000 next fin year) and claiming study expenses/work expenses set to be ~$3.5k for this financial year in turn reducing my gross income by ~$30.5k.
What do you guys think of maximizing my super contributions is my best bet for minimizing my tax and getting the most out of my income (while I'm in a stage where I don't have lots of assets/liabilities)? I figure if I make these concessions consecutively for the next few years I will be able to build up ~$120k in my super prior to turning 25 (in just straight contributions ignoring growth) setting me up well for my later years in life.
However my additional problem is I have a lot of liquid cash in the bank, to much for me to be comfortable with especially given the the low interest rate I get on my savings accounts. What do you guys think of my idea to invest in ETF's?
Cash (Percentage) Cash Allocation 80% of Cash Invested in to index funds (85% into safe growth ETFs (well as safe as they get)) then 15% invested in to australian commercial property based ETF's (more speculative - however investment is based off of recent WFH rulings by the Fair Work Commission - I personally am speculating on a return to the office movement happening in the next 12 - 24 months.) 20% of Cash Remain as liquid cash will be able to cover ~4 months of living expenses if everything goes upside down in my life.
I really welcome any feedback on my plan.
I definitely would not put any voluntary contribution into super if you are in your 20s. Even though there are great tax benefits for doing so 40 years from now is a long time away and the fiscally irresponsible government could keep changing the rules or outright nationalize/confiscate people's superannuation by then. Sure for somebody in there 50s it might make sense to make voluntary contributions but if you are in your 20s relying on the government not to do dumb things for another 40+ years is a huge gamble.Hi all,
A little about me - I am in my early 20s earning ~$100k a year and am seeking feedback on what people thing of my plan.
The Plan:
I was originally looking at potentially negatively gearing some shares i.e. $20k of a safe blue chip stock however came to realize that I am likely better off just reducing my taxable income by meeting the maximum super contribution ($27,500 atm due to increase to $30,000 next fin year) and claiming study expenses/work expenses set to be ~$3.5k for this financial year in turn reducing my gross income by ~$30.5k.
What do you guys think of maximizing my super contributions is my best bet for minimizing my tax and getting the most out of my income (while I'm in a stage where I don't have lots of assets/liabilities)? I figure if I make these concessions consecutively for the next few years I will be able to build up ~$120k in my super prior to turning 25 (in just straight contributions ignoring growth) setting me up well for my later years in life.
However my additional problem is I have a lot of liquid cash in the bank, to much for me to be comfortable with especially given the the low interest rate I get on my savings accounts. What do you guys think of my idea to invest in ETF's?
Cash (Percentage) Cash Allocation 80% of Cash Invested in to index funds (85% into safe growth ETFs (well as safe as they get)) then 15% invested in to australian commercial property based ETF's (more speculative - however investment is based off of recent WFH rulings by the Fair Work Commission - I personally am speculating on a return to the office movement happening in the next 12 - 24 months.) 20% of Cash Remain as liquid cash will be able to cover ~4 months of living expenses if everything goes upside down in my life.
I really welcome any feedback on my plan.
sadly , i agreeI definitely would not put any voluntary contribution into super if you are in your 20s. Even though there are great tax benefits for doing so 40 years from now is a long time away and the fiscally irresponsible government could keep changing the rules or outright nationalize/confiscate people's superannuation by then. Sure for somebody in there 50s it might make sense to make voluntary contributions but if you are in your 20s relying on the government not to do dumb things for another 40+ years is a huge gamble.
I agree at that age invest some money into shares outside of super. And that way you can decide to retire at whatever age you want rather than an arbitrary age set by government bureaucrats.sadly , i agree
maybe a small privately held portfolio , tilt towards shares paying fully franked divs and learn as you go , the education gained may well be more valuable than the extra tax paid ( if any )
I think I have come to the conclusion that I will get my balance to ~$35k. I similarly agree that the superannuation scheme will likely become less and less attractive over the next decade. The most recent tax changes have opened a pandoras box as well as the rise of extremely progressive politics.I definitely would not put any voluntary contribution into super if you are in your 20s. Even though there are great tax benefits for doing so 40 years from now is a long time away and the fiscally irresponsible government could keep changing the rules or outright nationalize/confiscate people's superannuation by then. Sure for somebody in there 50s it might make sense to make voluntary contributions but if you are in your 20s relying on the government not to do dumb things for another 40+ years is a huge gamble.
Playing team sports a great way to get that social aspect and a sense of mateship . fwiwMore culture related but I wanted to vent about out it anyways - the University system has really failed my generation when it comes to the creation of a culture on campus where people actually meet each other and make friends. Most University classes are silent without a peep of discussion/converse between students - however this could be to do with the stream of education I am undertaking. Not super relevant but I personally believe it is a key driver in what has caused the generation I'm apart of to become one of the loneliness despite the ease of communication.
yes , it can be ,but I see that as an investment in itself.
Is that to mean ...." effin lefties" ?the rise of extremely progressive politics.
Its actually more so the greensIs that to mean ...." effin lefties" ?
I wouldn't worry too much about that lot. The libs will not be in opposition forever . Even with a Labor government , things super are not going to swing radical . Not ever . For the foreseeable future the $30,000 p.a. concessional contribution will always be legit . Paying 15 % tax on it going in , is a whole lot better for me , than getting hit at my 45 % marginal tax rate . There can be no argument for the tax advantages of super . legislative risk will always be there of course , but it always has been . We will just have to get used to it as we live with every other damned thing in life that carries a risk .The $ 1.9 Mill. T.S.B. limit ( as well as the $ 3 mill. cap at the 15 % tax rate ) for a tax free retirement income stream is not to be scoffed at. Even more so as a couple . I don't know about the others , here , but for me , this is serious dough . Don't reject it out of hand , whatever else you choose to do. Wealth creation outside super ? Sure . Go for it. That's what I do , too. . I can tell you with the utmost sincerity , it would have been my greatest financial failure to have let superannuation pass me by .
common sense isn't that common , sadlyIts actually more so the greensespecially with my generation. Hopefully a swing of common sense in the next election away from the greens lol
I am 57, retired now, if I had put more money in super earlier, I would:I agree at that age invest some money into shares outside of super. And that way you can decide to retire at whatever age you want rather than an arbitrary age set by government bureaucrats.
About lonely generation, I assume that the capital cities population means 80 to 90% of the population live within 45minutes from a state university, so can go to uni and staying by mum and dad..great for money saving, less for maturing and social interactions vs stacking in a shared house away from home with other students.Playing team sports a great way to get that social aspect and a sense of mateship . fwiw
Index Fund Name | Weighting |
Vanguard Australia Property Securities Index ETF (VAP) | 33% |
BetaShares Australia 200 ETF (A200) | 33% |
Vanguard Diversified Balanced Index ETF (VDBA) | 33% |
Sector / Fund / Classification | Target/Intended Weighting |
Diversified Broad Market Growth ETF's | 55% |
Resource Sector ETF's | 20% |
Property Sector ETF's | 20% |
Speculative Individual Stocks (not sector specific) | 10% |
maybe , and maybe notFinally the speculative individual stocks - this is likely where I will get burnt,
yeah, and 3 x 33 is close enough !!Just realized I made a typo 50% on diversified growth etf's the above doesn't total 100%.
Yes couldn't agree more. Just need to remember to post for the monthly competition.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?