- Joined
- 28 October 2008
- Posts
- 8,609
- Reactions
- 39
Insiders could lift its credibility with the public at large by a little less worship at the alter of Labor and the likes of Craig Thomson.I think the ABC should find as many shonky crims as possible with allegations funded by politic enemy's of the government and repeat them continuously that way they could really lift their credibility...................with...........you!
Insiders could lift its credibility with the public at large by a little less worship at the alter of Labor and the likes of Craig Thomson.
I think Andrew Bolt's show now outrates Insiders.
Insiders could lift its credibility with the public at large by a little less worship at the alter of Labor and the likes of Craig Thomson.
I think Andrew Bolt's show now outrates Insiders.
,,,Bolts show is pure comedy.
Bolts show is pure comedy.
I don't think you'll get too much argument defending Andrew Bolt as unbiased.I sometimes think Bolt himself wonders about what he has been told to say.
I don't find it that funny but very awkward and a little embarrassing. I would be ashamed to show this show to a visiting tourist from Britain. It seems so poorly researched and the sets look wonky.
Barry Cassidy's selection of the final panel for the year was a stroke of genius. At first glance you might think that with three News Ltd panellists that it would be pro-Abbot. Not so;
Nikki Sava, columnist for the Australian and certainly pro-Abbott and anti-Gillard.
Malcolm Farr, News Ltd. journalist on the Canberra Press Gallery. Pro-Gillard and anti-Abbott. (the standard Press Gallery position)
Dennis Atkins, Courier-Mail political writer. Pro-Gillard and anti-Abbott and anti-Newman.
Nikki Sava was ambushed.
Just to rub in the left-leaning ascendency the guest interviewee was Christine Milne.
Bolt now attracts more viewers in total than Insiders on ABC TV does. Insiders’ ABC1 audience from 9 to 10am has fallen 11.7% to 173,000 this year (still well ahead of Bolt) from 195,000 in 2011. The News 24 simulcast audience is up more than 21% to 56,000 from 46,000 and the evening repeat on News 24 has up more than 27% to 32,000 from 26,000. On several occasions in the past three months, Bolt’s 10am audience has exceeded that of Insiders which has fallen into a bit of trough since midyear.
Perhaps that is exactly the reason more people are tuning into the Bolt report than Insiders!
http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/21...to-his-defender-lachlan/?wpmp_switcher=mobile
Barry Cassidy's selection of the final panel for the year was a stroke of genius. At first glance you might think that with three News Ltd panellists that it would be pro-Abbot. Not so;
Nikki Sava, columnist for the Australian and certainly pro-Abbott and anti-Gillard.
Malcolm Farr, News Ltd. journalist on the Canberra Press Gallery. Pro-Gillard and anti-Abbott. (the standard Press Gallery position)
Dennis Atkins, Courier-Mail political writer. Pro-Gillard and anti-Abbott and anti-Newman.
Nikki Sava was ambushed.
Just to rub in the left-leaning ascendency the guest interviewee was Christine Milne.
Perhaps that is exactly the reason more people are tuning into the Bolt report than Insiders!
Both Insiders and Bolt are biased, but between the two of them, there's an approximate balance.The insiders is all class will miss it until it starts up again next year
Yes, the irony is inescapable, especially now that we have seen the type of people with whom she has associated in the form of Wilson and Blewitt.[
Interesting that so many do not follow on with "Meet The Press" after Bolt is finished. Gillard was on yesterday and I was quick to put an end to the droning of "sleaze". Hypocrital, isn't it? The one she accuses of sleaze is a happily married man with three lovely daughters while she has a history of married men...
Janet Albrechtsen gets an invitation to join the ABC's Insiders program.
I think she's declined.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opi...-into-groupthink/story-e6frg7bo-1226534885161
drsmith;739716[B said:]Both Insiders and Bolt are biased[/B], but between the two of them, there's an approximate balance.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?