wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,586
- Reactions
- 12,710
Ah, right that didn't come up in a word search thanks for that. Cheers.Nope, I didn't miss any detail. I clearly covered it in post 2771 when I said the broadcasting act of 1992 has the same impartiality requirement as the ABC act.
The broadcasting act for television and radio have the same code of impartially and a separate one for print / internet and they all have the same code.
TV (3.4)
Radio (3.1)
3.
1.1 Impartiality
1.1.1 In broadcasting a news Program, a Licensee must:
a) present news fairly and impartially;
b) clearly distinguish the reporting of factual material from commentary and analysis.
https://www.acma.gov.au/theACMA/Abo...schemes-index-radio-content-regulation-i-acma
All forms of media in this country are supposed to be impartial when it comes to news reports.
Nevertheless they have been pinged on the code and not on the ACT. The act refers to news reports and as far as I can tell, the commercial stations are pretty squeaky clean there. Commentary does not seem to come under the act or the code for impartiality.
Therefore there is still no comparison.