- Joined
- 1 February 2006
- Posts
- 568
- Reactions
- 7
5.) It sounds like you're wanting me to flash you a detectives badge for id and give you my life story. If I was a geo working in the Au sector would that satisfy you?
7.) So explain to me their findings Nick. What depth of mineralisation? What is the strip ratio? Is the ore refractory? What is the host rock? Is it open along strike? Is the mineralisation structurally controlled? A grade of 2.4g/t tells me very little.
jman
Differences of opinions aside, I'm glad to hear any information you guys have got to share but keep your heads on guys, its not about being right or wrong its about identifying opportunities.
It's been good to see some positive volume action over the last couple of days (especially today!), the bargain hunters are starting to give us some nice buoyancy at 160 - 170
Thank you very much jman for your geological appreciations.
I’m distressed with Williams & Co either. They made a poor job in communication and explaining the shareholders their strategy. A lot of promises – and none was fulfilled so far.
But you shouldn’t forget (and I guess that is Nicks point of view):
AAM currently isn’t valued as a possible producer in 2008 or 2009 without any further marketcap dilution.
With an enterprise value of about 10 m AUD is valued as a pure exploration play that has to dig some years, dillute a lot and maybe possibly will produce in > 5 years.
So the chance/risk ratio at 0,16 per share is quite o.k.
And maybe a deposit that in 2003/2004 with a POG of 350 USD was not economical is mineable in these days with a POG of 1000 USD….
Cheers
Maigret
POG looking very stong. Seems like a consistent uptrend has been going for some time now (with minor corrections along the way).
Seems like interest has been renewed in AAM. Volume has been steadily increasing and buy support seems to have come back online, perhaps its about to turn? I wonder if any chartists can give us some analysis?
I have it forth lowest on my Kennas Nerd List attached at just $17 an ounce to EV.
Maybe my figures aren't updated.
Why do you think it's so undervalued as a general comparion?
Aiming to produce 30k a year doesn't sound that exciting perhaps.
Thursday, October 29, 2009
A1 Minerals presents at Mining 2009 - Santa is coming
Mining 2009 revved up a notch today as delegates heard a pitch from Perth based near term gold producer A1 Minerals (ASX: AAM).
John Williams managing director of A1 enthralled investors with, "all things going well, we should be pulling gold by Christmas".
The company is fully funded to production, a rarity indeed.
With the Brightstar Gold Project, seven deposits in the Laverton district of Western Australia, A1 has a current JORC resource of 1.7 million ounces of gold at 2.5 g/t gold, with 150,000 ounces in the reserve category at 4.2 g/t gold, and 350,000 ounces in the probable category.
There is potential to go deeper. As well as get stuck into exploration in other nearby deposits.
Anglogold has the nearby Sunrise Dam and Barrick, the Granny Smith gold operations.
Establishing a 100% owned gravity/CIP treatment plant next door to the resource at the Beta plant site enabled A1 to keep the project costs down. In fact, to date the company has only spent $20 million, with $4 million left in the bank. Not bad for a company that will be in production in a few months.
Previous owners of the Beta plant site got into financial difficulties, providing an opportunity for A1.
The gold treatment plant is rated at 300,000 tonnes per annum, with potential John Williams said, to expand this to 700,000 tonnes per annum in due course.
The Beta orebody is high grade, near surface material with overburden removed.
Williams estimates the plant can produce a handy 30,000 ounces of gold per annum over a four year mine life. With cash operating costs at A$600/ounce, that's a nice margin for A1. That production level is likely to be increased, to around 50,000 ounces per annum in time, once cash generation commences and the market cottons on to the transformation of the company to producer - with resource upside.
Delegates heard there is significant exploration upside at the company's other prospects, with upside in the resource base, and likely production increases to follow.
On a comparison basis, A1 seems to stack up well and appears lightly valued, relative to its listed gold peers on a resource basis and on a comparative value per ounce.
A1 Minerals has ticked all boxes it said it would to investors, developing a multi-million ounce gold resource and into gold production on time, with exploration and production upside.
In fact, there aren't that many gold producers that will get into gold production within the next few months.
You'd expect a person in his shoes to be bullish and Williams backed the presentation up with, "There's going to be a massive re-rating - has to be, when we get into production".
With a market capitalisation of $35 million, share price of 20 cents, cash of $4 million, fully funded into production, there appears good reason for his exhortation.
As he said, "Santa is coming...we will be producing gold by Christmas." Yes John, there may very well be a Santa Claus - afterall.
I have it forth lowest on my Kennas Nerd List attached at just $17 an ounce to EV.
Maybe my figures aren't updated.
Why do you think it's so undervalued as a general comparion?
Aiming to produce 30k a year doesn't sound that exciting perhaps.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?