Well, there you go! Rather proves the point that Bunyip was making and endorses Tin Hat's view that it's a dog.
I'll hold off on the 'amusement' and wish you the best of luck with it.
Personally I’ve never seen any sense in holding on to dogs for prolonged periods of time, when you could instead have your capital better employed in a stock that’s heading solidly upward.
The market decides the value of a stock. You or I do not.
Agree entirely.
Looks like someone needs to get this thing a bone and give it a pat.
I’ll bet CAB has been a buy recommendation from various brokers and analysts and newsletters all the way down from $14.
They would have called it ‘good value at current prices’!
Called out on what exactly? And by whom?WOW! Thats a special kind of bitchiness!
I guess you don't like being called out then?
Piopiou, I read your posts with interest. Look at the chart. Look at a monthly, weekly and daily charts for this stock. It's a dog. No point chasing "value" or yield if the market thinks the stock is a dog and you have to watch the capital value of your investment go down month after month. I haven't analysed this stock from a FA point of view nor analysed the quality of the management to make the transformative changes that are probably required for this company to prosper in the long term. The charts do tell me what the market thinks of this company....
The above reminded me of a post many years back by Bunyip which I've always remembered because it made so much sense and turned me into a trend follower.
We do whatever works for us. If someone is making money from a method that’s very different to mine, then good luck to him.
Personally I’ve never seen any sense in holding on to dogs for prolonged periods of time, when you could instead have your capital better employed in a stock that’s heading solidly upward.
The market decides the value of a stock. You or I do not. Time and again I’ve known people to buy stocks because they considered them realistic value or undervalued. And time and again I’ve watched those same stocks go down down down.
A mate used to pass on Renee Rivkin’s newsletter to me. Rivkin liked a stock called Pasminco so much that he recommended it in a number of his newsletters as ‘good value at these prices’. Pasminco continued heading south and the company eventually went broke.
A bloke I met at an options night told me he lost ‘well in excess of a six figure sum’ by buying more Pasminco shares every time they fell by another ten percent. He fell into the trap of thinking ‘it has to be good value at these prices, it has to be even better value now that it’s fallen even further. He could have avoided his big loss, and quite likely made substantial profits instead, simply by avoiding a dog like Pasminco and putting his money into some up trending stocks instead.
Called out on what exactly?
Why have now repeated goes at me,
despite my polite request to not continue any exchange,
If you have decided to continue holding the stock, that's your business. Others are, however, entirely entitled to express an opinion about the stock and the general strategy of holding on to losing stocks. I have no idea why you have chosen to turn such opinions into a personal attack.
Your strawman arguments in the TGA thread.
Oh, please.
Actually you didnt request anything of me, you said you were not going to comment anymore.
More strawman nonsense, I have not personally attacked anyone for their opinion about holding this stock, nor have I suggested they are not entitled to hold opinions on this or any other matter.
What's with all this strawman garbage.
https://www.aussiestockforums.com/f...=18617&page=52&p=796158&viewfull=1#post796158
If you are going to use the old English term straw man at least understand what it means and spell it correctly, its straw man, two words.
Little knowledge of and misuse of basic terms is the normal behaviour for and aids in the recognition of sciolists, an area where you seem to admirably tick all the boxes.
This CAB chart with all the buy recommendations as the stock headed south reminds me of the presentation given by Nick Radge at an ATAA meeting in Brisbane.Bunyip, you aroused my curiosity. Here is one broker who shall remain nameless.
Cheers
Country Lad
View attachment 54617
The really scary thing with that chart is that the brokers had picked so many of the peaks! Even with the fall in price over time there were many entry points where good profits could have been made subsequently, but at a glance they seem to have only picked a couple of them.
We're talking about opinions here, not hard facts.
The past ought to be factual but the future is necessarily a matter of opinion with many different possible outcomes. CAB could be bankrupt two years from now, or it could make investors an absolute fortune. Nobody here can say with certainty that either of those two scenarios won't happen.
Agree entirely.
Looks like someone needs to get this thing a bone and give it a pat.
Guys, all this banter and posting is irrelevant, one look at a chart and a four year old could tell you what the reality is.
Reality - the price is going down, unless you are short it will cost you money
Guys, all this banter and posting is irrelevant, one look at a chart and a four year old could tell you what the reality is.
Reality - the price is going down, unless you are short it will cost you money
I find it pretty funny that the so called technicians on this site are posting the CAB chart as a big "told you so", but they're actually posting the unadjusted chart, which obviously doesn't take into account dividend or split or anything else. Which is so stupid because if you are short you have to pay the dividend along with the cost of your margin.
I didn’t mention shorting it. I simply stated that your capital could be better employed in up trending stocks rather than being tied up for prolonged periods in dogs.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?