- Joined
- 23 November 2004
- Posts
- 3,974
- Reactions
- 850
Yeah the media is responsible for Tony's dire poll numbers and his inept "captain's picks" :shake:
Well you could be right, but I think it's more self inflicted.
Yeah the media is responsible for Tony's dire poll numbers and his inept "captain's picks" :shake:
Malcolm Turnbull: politicians must resist being 'bullied' by likes of Alan Jones
A day after failed spill motion, communications minister says politicians should stand up for beliefs and ‘not be bullied into an echo chamber’ by the media
Malcolm Turnbull has warned that politicians must resist being “bullied” by media figures such as Alan Jones and instead win the respect of the public by standing their ground.
The communications minister, who was widely expected to run for the Liberal leadership if Monday’s spill motion against Tony Abbott had succeeded, said politicians should stand up for their beliefs and “not be bullied into an echo chamber”.
"Should I go Labor, should I go Liberal...that is the question!" And on deciding John Howard had the best chance of winning the election goes Liberal and his seat of Wentworth goes Liberal. So what is really at the core of the man? I would suggest just personal ambition, having such confidence in his own intelligence that it will transcend everything. Another narcissist that will do anything for power?
Noco it would explain a lot if you get your views from these crackpot chain emails.
But in a nutshell, if he is given control of the Liberal Party, then there will be ZERO difference between Labor and Liberal. As you know, there is already far too much that the two parties have in common.
Imagine if they had no differences whatsoever. Australia would be under the control of true socialist dictatorship!
If the Liberal party doesn’t get its act together one way or another Australia will be back under control of the socialist dictators anyway after the next election.
Whilst I would rather that this whole leadership issue would just go away (which could happen if the media started reporting some real news instead of make-believe news) if there must be a change of leadership and if it goes to Turnbull, then at least Australia would be under the control of a Liberal socialist dictator rather than a Labor socialist dictator. The latter would himself be under the control of the Unions.
PS: Does anyone know the difference between 'socialist dictatorship' and 'true socialist dictatorship'?
I cant`t wait.there will be new poll out tomorrow.
He was a merchant banker. Sure he was in touch with the Liberal vote and agreed with them on social issues unlike Abbott but he is a capitalist through and through. Not a union member but didn't suck up to Murdoch so got hate press. Forget it.I think Malcolm could be PM again.
All he has to do is join the Labor Party, shove Shorten to the back bench (should not be too hard considering how many Labor members dislike him (Shorten)).
Now then, where can Malcolm find a safe Labor seat.........
You could say the same sentence the day after the next election.I just hope this government goes soon.
I don't think the country deserves even another 6 months of this clueless rabble.
Murdoch can be thanked for that.You could say the same sentence the day after the next election.
You're not wrong. In one way it's ironic how Turnbull got his wish for Australia to be a republic.Murdoch can be thanked for that.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.