My concern for the NBN is that as the Telstra 4G and Voadaphone, Optus et al start delivering faster and faster download speeds over it's wireless networks, the take up rate to residential homes "might" take a solid hit. This will completely stuff the profit forecasting as well as revenue right up the poo shooter.
Yes yes yes as more people use the bandwidth the slower it gets blah blah bloody blah. Average Joe Schmoe in the street doesn't care.![]()
But Average Joe will care if the speeds don't live up to what's promised, and he will also care about the price of the service.
For a Telstra NextG standalone broadband connection (ie: not bundled with a fixed phone), you pay a total of $89.95 per month for 12Gb of data.
For an iiNet standalone NBN connection (at a speed of 25Mbps) you pay a total of $29.95 per month for 20GB of data. Pay another $10 and you get a phoneline as well, and free national/local calls included.
How do you think Average Joe will feel about paying 3 times as much, for just over half the data delivered almost certainly at a lower speed. Is mobility worth that much? And what good is Joe's mobility when he's taken the card with him, and his family is at home with no connection?
Now if I were Average Joe, I'd have an NBN connection/phone (for $40), and a smartphone with a gig or two of data (on a ~$45 plan). Now for a total of $85/month I have fixed line with free calls plus fast fixed broadband plus a mobile phone with data when I need mobility. And I'm getting this for less money than a mobile broadband connection by itself!
I have no doubt that there will be some people who will be mobile-only. But they will be a small, specific minority. Not just because wireless is slower, but also because it's much more expensive.
Ummmmmmmmmm ........ not quite there old ****. NBNMYths flat out accused Slipperz of being a liar about his internet speed that he was obtaining. Slipperz posted a speed test and there was no apology from NBNMyths when he was proven wrong. You really need to keep up old chap. I also notice with NBNMYths when proven wrong it is completely dismissed or overlooked or ignored.
If you look really closely IFocus you will see the cable is BLUE and not BLACK. Oh well ........ I must not have a viable argument as I am getting personal now.
Ummmmm you also wrote this "Fiber is already strung all round the place its not new!" ........ I wont bother correcting the obvious spelling mistake as this would seem pithy. SO ...... where is this fibre "strung all over the place" and what does it do already? Why aren't we utilising the fibre "strung all over the place" and who owns it?
While I remain somewhat sceptical about NextG delivering sustained speeds of 17-19Mbps to anyone, I said I'll give the guy the benefit of the doubt. But the real point (even assuming he is getting that speed reliably) is, that the vast majority of people aren't getting anything like it. There's no point promoting an option as viable based on the exception rather than the rule. And the rule is that NextG delivers average speeds to most users of well under 5Mbps:
There is plenty of fibre around, but it's generally either backhaul. There is very little running down suburban streets except for the fibre components of the HFC (hybrid fibre-coaxial)networks. Some new housing estates have had fibre for a while, but it's not "strung up", it's underground.
And it can be black or blue (or any other colour you'd like) depending on the brand: