- Joined
- 29 March 2010
- Posts
- 68
- Reactions
- 0
I sent you a PM, you never replied to it WHY.
I will be replying to it very shortly. The ongoing campaign to save Schapelle Corby's life is very time consuming. It is, and will remain, my priority.
I sent you a PM, you never replied to it WHY.
your readiness to overlook or side step the facts in your pursuit of your goal
Reality and the facts will not get in the way of your campaign to fight the false cause of this girl
tried in a ligitimate court in a sovereign country, found guilty (despite the court bending over backwards to hear evidence and wild conjecture and hearsay from all the conspiracy theorists) and sentenced.
It really is time to accept the facts and move on.
All the bleating in the world is not going to change the facts.
I was under the impression her father is deceased.
Your battles on her behalf are admirable.
What other causes do you support?
gg
Yes, her father died of cancer on the 17th January 2008. He fought his illness for several years in a vain attempt to see Schapelle walk free before he died, but the injustice of her 20 year sentence won out in the end.
I am sponsoring two children overseas, one in Mexico and one in Kenya.
I also support a number of animal welfare and environmental organisations - IFAW, WWF, RSPCA, Animals Asia, Greenpeace and Oceanic Research. I regularly "Click to Donate" on the Care2 site and sign any Care2 petitions that I consider deserve my support.
What causes do you support?
What first attracted you to fighting the good fight for Ms.Corby.
Was it before or after after Schapelle's father went to the great One in the sky.
Did you know her father or was it just the injustice you felt had been perpetrated on his daughter, or was it when he developed cancer and couldn't survive the 20 year sentence placed on her by the Indonesian Justice system, and the cancer then won out in the end, leaving you to carry on the fight, or was it before that?
gg
Nulla Nulla, please tell me which 'facts' you are referring to. Would it be the BULLDUST 'facts' that you, and every other Australian, have been deliberately and systematically fed by the main stream media, since just before Schapelle's verdict to the present day?
My support for Schapelle is based on the fact that she is a dear friend of mine, who I "love like a daughter." I also support her because she is innocent, is seriously mentally ill (despite what Channel 9 tried to convince you all of to the contrary, two nights ago), and because she needs to be released from prison very soon, or she will commit suicide.
My total belief in her innocence is based on the fact that I know her well enough to know that she didn't do it, I know her brothers well enough to know that they didn't do it, and on the mountain of REAL facts that me and my fellow supporters have uncovered in our YEARS of research.
So, with respect, it is you who are ignoring the facts, facts that you may not even be aware of.
If you wish to enlighten yourself, I invite you to check out the following article: http://schapellecorby-simbasgoogleb...03/why-i-support-schapelle-corby-why-you.html
As for the court bending over backwards to hear evidence, well I'm sorry, but this is simply not the case. They dismissed the testimony of all Schapelle's witnesses, including her sworn statement, they denied fingerprinting of the plastic bags, they denied forensic testing of the drugs, the Bali Police refused to weigh Schapelle's bags so a comparison could be made with the checked-in weight. They also denied access to CCTV footage from Denpasar Airport which would have corroborated Schapelle's version of events, in relation to what actually happened, and what was actually said, when the drugs were discovered in her bag.
The only evidence they took any notice of was the testimony of two Customs Officers and two Police Officers who were in the airport at the time. Their principle witness had a very poor command of English, and the two Police Officers could not even speak English, yet they were all very sure of what Schapelle had 'said', even though they would have had NO idea what she said.
Those on the panel of three Judges had never acquitted a defendant in their entire careers, so the chances that they would break with tradition and find Schapelle innocent, especially when they were ignoring all the evidence in favour of her innocence, was essentially zero!
Check out this song, if you wish:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MI5eF8sfgY
Honourable, I could not under stand why when they had some of the drugs, that she was caught with, that it was not sent away for forensic testing, had this of be done we would have known if the drugs came from Queensland or some other place. Now as you have had your finger on the pulse from the start of this case could you tell me who or WHY this testing did not go ahead?? Thanks..
you are in a significant minority because everything I have heard and read about this case is at a wide variance with your view of it.
There is a long history of people falling in love with jail-birds
Yes, those like me who say that Schapelle Corby is innocent, and that her family were not involved in the drug trade, are in the minority these days. This is all thanks to a media smear campaign against Schapelle and her family which is unprecedented in Australian history.
Yes, those like me who say that Schapelle Corby is innocent, and that her family were not involved in the drug trade, are in the minority these days. This is all thanks to a media smear campaign against Schapelle and her family which is unprecedented in Australian history.
Honourable, I could not under stand why when they had some of the drugs, that she was caught with, that it was not sent away for forensic testing, had this of be done we would have known if the drugs came from Queensland or some other place. Now as you have had your finger on the pulse from the start of this case could you tell me who or WHY this testing did not go ahead?? Thanks..
Honourable, I could not under stand why when they had some of the drugs, that she was caught with, that it was not sent away for forensic testing, had this of be done we would have known if the drugs came from Queensland or some other place. Now as you have had your finger on the pulse from the start of this case could you tell me who or WHY this testing did not go ahead?? Thanks..
So, the question everyone should be asking is, who is covering up what?
Honorable, I note in your Blog that you said no one takes Drugs to Bali as you can get them cheaper in Bali than in Australia, WRONG, WRONG.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.