Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Sarah Palin: The Barracuda

Old Arnie has something in common with Kevin07 ,they both forget things when it's convenient(bar-lap dancers:D)
 
If I am an American and believe my eyes then I will vote for Sarah Palin.

It is because - she is gorgeous, sexy, would be grandmother (who cares with her daughter being pregnant at 16 without with being married - we are used to see it any way and in England - see Naomi Campbell - a gorgeous model and grandmother), winks with inviting eyes , a bit idiot (that is okay for any American any way) compared with

an old McCain (with almost use by date),

a confused Obama (namesake of Osama worries me) and

the VP candidate with Obama (sorry even to remember his name:).
 
If I am an American and believe my eyes then I will vote for Sarah Palin.

It is because - she is [size=+2]gorgeous, sexy,[/size] would be grandmother (who cares with her daughter being pregnant at 16 without with being married - we are used to see it any way and in England - see Naomi Campbell - a gorgeous model and grandmother), [size=+2]winks with inviting eyes[/size], [size=+2]a bit idiot [/size](that is okay for any American any way) compared with an old McCain (with almost use by date), a confused Obama (namesake of Osama worries me) and the VP candidate with Obama (sorry even to remember his name:).

*Cringe*

Thanks for that.

Now I can just imagine all these redneck good 'ol boys chanting...

[size=+1] OH YEAAAH BABY!!! RAH, RAH,[/size] [size=+2] SA-RAH!![/size], [size=+1] YUMMY-YUMMY [/size][size=+2]HOCKEY-MUMMY!![/size]

Looks like you hit the nail on the head....


:eek:
 
*Cringe*

Thanks for that.

Now I can just imagine all these redneck good 'ol boys chanting...

[size=+1] OH YEAAAH BABY!!! RAH, RAH,[/size] [size=+2] SA-RAH!![/size], [size=+1] YUMMY-YUMMY [/size][size=+2]HOCKEY-MUMMY!![/size]

Looks like you hit the nail on the head....


:eek:

LOL, they will have to change the way they poll in the US election:

'So who wood you vote for in the forth-coming election?' :eek:

Bit stiff on gramps, gramps and the terrorist hey.
 
Can you imagine if Sarah Palin had travelled to Pakistan when she was in her 20's on an Indonesian passport? Can you imagine how the media would blow this up into a major issue. In fact, the BIG issue about her is that she never had a passport until last year. But Barack Obama had an Indonesian passport when he was an adult, and the media could care less.

Arnold's not running for President, and is constitutionally prohibited from it, because he is not native born.

The relevance in the case of Obama is that Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship, so, the only way for Obama to have gotten an Indonesian passport would have been that he would have had to renounce his American citizenship. If he did that, he would not be eligible to run for President. But the media is only curious about Palin, Obama they don't even try to investigate.

I'm not talking about when he was a child, different matter. This ocurred when he was an adult. Get it?

You are correct about Arnie.

But where did you obtain your 'misinformation' about Barack?

Senator Obama admits that he had a duel citizenship of both United States and Kenya. He said his father registered him at birth. He said that he stopped being a citizen at the age of 21 because he never claimed it.


Obama never had an Indonesian passport! What makes you say he did?

This is typical Republican propaganda that hopes mud will stick - make some smoke and hope fire is seen!

Dual Nationality
November 22nd, 2006, in News & Issues, by Patung

Children born of mixed Indonesian and foreign parentage can now obtain dual nationality.

As one of the first examples of the implementation of the new citizenship law, on the 21st of November in Jakarta the Law and Human Rights minister, Hamid Awaluddin, officiated at the granting of dual nationality papers (SK Kewarganegaraan Indonesia) to thirteen children of mixed Indonesian/foreign parentage, at the Mandarin Oriental hotel on Jalan M.H. Thamrin.

Children granted dual citizenship, later, at the age of 18, have three years to decide whether they wish to become “full” Indonesian citizens, and renounce their foreign citizenship, or the other way round.

Previously, under the old law, nationality was deemed to always derive from the paternal side.
http://www.indonesiamatters.com/830/dual-nationality/

For sanity's sake use some common sense and start looking at policies and attributes required of a president and refrain from the faux personality attacks.
 
Dual Nationality
November 22nd, 2006, in News & Issues, by Patung

Children born of mixed Indonesian and foreign parentage can now obtain dual nationality.

As one of the first examples of the implementation of the new citizenship law, on the 21st of November in Jakarta the Law and Human Rights minister, Hamid Awaluddin, officiated at the granting of dual nationality papers (SK Kewarganegaraan Indonesia) to thirteen children of mixed Indonesian/foreign parentage, at the Mandarin Oriental hotel on Jalan M.H. Thamrin.

Children granted dual citizenship, later, at the age of 18, have three years to decide whether they wish to become “full” Indonesian citizens, and renounce their foreign citizenship, or the other way round.

Previously, under the old law, nationality was deemed to always derive from the paternal side.
What you have just quoted was effective November 22nd, 2006. His travel on an Indonesian passport was when he was in his 20s, back in the 1980s. So, your post has no bearing on the matter I pointed out.

You and 2020 have posted so many falsehoods about John McCain, over and over and over again. This story is just now starting to be investigated. Let's see where it falls. Why didn't he travel on his American passport? Why hasn't he released his passport records? What is he hiding? No one has ever asked him directly if he travelled to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport.
 
Umm, would someone be kind enough to explain to me why this stuff matters, i.e. whether a couple of decades or more ago Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport, if indeed he did?
 
n1377300116_30341002_220.jpg
 
What you have just quoted was effective November 22nd, 2006. His travel on an Indonesian passport was when he was in his 20s, back in the 1980s. So, your post has no bearing on the matter I pointed out.

You and 2020 have posted so many falsehoods about John McCain, over and over and over again. This story is just now starting to be investigated. Let's see where it falls. Why didn't he travel on his American passport? Why hasn't he released his passport records? What is he hiding? No one has ever asked him directly if he travelled to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport.

I'll type this slowly...

Dual passports for Indonesia did not exist until two years ago.

Obama went to Pakistan with a Pakistani college friend and stayed at his home.

Julia is right.

Enough!
 
I'll type this slowly...

Dual passports for Indonesia did not exist until two years ago.

Obama went to Pakistan with a Pakistani college friend and stayed at his home.

Julia is right.

Enough!

Thank you Doris! Now lets get back to the point of the thread

What are their Aims, How they will achieve them. I am getting tired of the repetitious slander, insinuations and lies which seems to be consuming precious little time they have left. Not impressed with a rally Palin did and said I read the NY Review and those around her booed. I wished they would read things, compare and think outside the circle. No paper is perfect and what maybe 'headline new' today can change tomorrow on circumstance.

As for that photo supplied by Largesse she needs to work on core muscle strength. It actually is a rather pathetic pose. I didn't realize this campaign was about breasts and butts. Can you imagine if they had done that with McCain – actually don’t go there.

Hillary is versed on history, proven progress to benefit her country, decorous, and gracious. When she campaigned non of this shallow pr0n orientated smut circled. Sure there were words but she has shown her higher ground and risen above it to support the ideals she believes in though the voice of Obama.

The irony is the USA is the biggest pr0n user but going topless on a USA beach will end up with you being fined. Where I live topless is the norm and even the kids don’t bat an eyelid. It is very helpful prior to breastfeeding to strengthen the nipple so it has less chance of cracking whilst feeding.:)
 
Where I live topless is the norm and even the kids don’t bat an eyelid. It is very helpful prior to breastfeeding to strengthen the nipple so it has less chance of cracking whilst feeding.
:topic holy bra-straps batman, learn summit new every day, lol
 
It is because - she is gorgeous, sexy, would be grandmother (who cares with her daughter being pregnant at 16 without with being married - we are used to see it any way and in England -

Her daughter Bristol is 17. She's 18 in mid October I believe.
It's interesting that Palin's son was born almost seven months after she eloped.
Twentieth wedding anniversary was on 29 August; Track born on 20 April 1989...
No wonder she preaches abstinence! :confused:
 
Her daughter Bristol is 17. She's 18 in mid October I believe.
It's interesting that Palin's son was born almost seven months after she eloped.
Twentieth wedding anniversary was on 29 August; Track born on 20 April 1989...
No wonder she preaches abstinence! :confused:

Oh.

Doesn't *ABSTINENCE* make the heart grow fonder?? :kiss:
 
I believe that John McCain and Sarah Palin are very open minded people. Perhaps you don't agree with many of their stands on the issues, but they are less likely to take your rights away from you than those people on the left. The left is very scary, they start with good intentions, but in the end, they wind up taking away more and more of your rights and freedoms.
Provide evidence Zzzz. The only governments I remember taking 'freedoms' away in recent memory were conservative. Why don't you ask civil libertarians what they think of the Bush record on freedom policies, eg the Patriot Act. You can't really, possibly, actually believe what you are saying, can you?

What about the rights and freedoms of those in Guantanamo - only US and UK citizens such as John Walker Lindh were (eventually) afforded proper jurisprudence - meanwhile others (including Australians) had to endure a joke of a trial without proper recourse to the legal system - and for Australian David Hicks that joke of a trial was only held after five years sitting in Guantanamo. Why is that a US citizen deserves access to a proper legal system but those of other nations do not?? We are even supposed to be your allies.


I honestly believe, as many very competent scientists believe, that climate change is cyclical. Perhaps a little man made, but, before we can blink an eye, and the sunspot cycles come and go, we will be in for a change in the other direction. We only have historical evidence to prove that the earth heats, and the earth cools. There is very little man can do to change it either way. I know you disagree with this, but I can name some very prominent scientists that believe the way I do.

Name these pre-eminent scientists. One of our pre-eminent scientists/climatologists was named Australian-of-the-Year here last year. He knew of no scientific article disproving man-made climate change that had been peer reviewed. Do you?

We all know climate change is cyclical - just because it is, doesn't mean that we aren't causing a massive effect by dumping a ****eload of extra CO2 and other pollution in to the environment in, what is for the Earth, a very very short period of time. Have a look at a graph of population growth over the last 2000 years. Consider that same graph represents to some correlative extent, deforestation, and pollutant increases. I don't think you need to be a rocket scientist to arrive at an obvious conclusion from looking at it.

Here is the population graph
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Population_curve.svg
 
Her daughter Bristol is 17. She's 18 in mid October I believe.
It's interesting that Palin's son was born almost seven months after she eloped.
Twentieth wedding anniversary was on 29 August; Track born on 20 April 1989...
No wonder she preaches abstinence! :confused:

Doris I do hope you are not a godbotherer.

You sound a bit like those dried up old believers who used label kids born before their parents were married as bastards and who counted the months from a wedding to a birth of young men and women caught in the family way.

The Palins if they were Democrats and aborted a few children along the way from each generation would have been hailed by the left as battlers who should be afforded the right to choose, and lauded for their humble backgrounds.

There is one judgement for Republican kids in love and another for Democrats' methinks, in this thread.



gg
 
yeah but gg, Palin is the one pretending to hold the moral high ground :eek:

... and resisting sex education :eek:

I don't think GG knows much about Sarah Palin.

He should read this (his) thread dontcha think. :rolleyes:

GG - Palin claims she believes in abstinence and that this is the only sex ed that should be done in schools!
... as do the millions of evangelical voters she was chosen for!
... as does McCain.

Yet her 17 year old daughter obviously did not abstain - - nor did she!!
This is hypocritical! She is a hypocrite!

And did you know some of the money she saved Wasilla when she was mayor (that she boasted about in the debate) was to make rape victims pay for their own rape kit - $250 to $1200 each - needed to prove rape so they could obtain an abortion - which she doesn't believe in either... even for victims of incest! When the State legislature heard about it they made it law that Wasilla (and ONE other town that was also making victims pay) had to pay for the rape kits.
Imagine having to pay for the fingerprinting kit if your house were robbed! :eek:

The 'theory' seems to be if women couldn't afford the kit they would not become a rape statistic.
... fewer rapes under her watch - as well as the town saving money.

She sacked the police commissioner at the request of the hotels and the NRA because he was fighting to have the bar-closing time reduced from 5am to 2am and would not budge. Why? Because Alaska has the highest rate of violence against women in the US and most of this occurred due to drunkenness in the early hours.

With $billions in surplus, as governor, she would not fund safe-houses for women... she got a committee to 'look into it'.

btw... I fully agree that no aspersions should ever be placed on children born out of wedlock!
 
Her daughter Bristol is 17. She's 18 in mid October I believe.
It's interesting that Palin's son was born almost seven months after she eloped.
Twentieth wedding anniversary was on 29 August; Track born on 20 April 1989...
No wonder she preaches abstinence! :confused:

Doris I do hope you are not a godbotherer.

You sound a bit like those dried up old believers who used label kids born before their parents were married as bastards and who counted the months from a wedding to a birth of young men and women caught in the family way.

The Palins if they were Democrats and aborted a few children along the way from each generation would have been hailed by the left as battlers who should be afforded the right to choose, and lauded for their humble backgrounds.

There is one judgement for Republican kids in love and another for Democrats' methinks, in this thread.



gg

yeah but gg, Palin is the one pretending to hold the moral high ground :eek:

... and resisting sex education :eek:


2020 mate, the politically correct Left are more than capable of taking over from the old fashioned godbotherers in lecturing, and hectoring the common people on what they should and should not do.

The language is the same, the content is the same and the methods are the same. Engender fear and you will keep the people down.

Folk like Sarah Palin can cut through all the nonsense, with common sense and acceeptance of human frailty, and thats what upsets the political class.

gg
 
I'm starting to feel a bit nauseated reading this thread. This isn't even our election, folks. Do we really have to get into this level of commentary, none of which is relevant to the current global situation?
 
Top