Australia vs. India - Why India WILL WIN

[doctorj]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

Do not worry
Doctor J is a moderator too so he would get away with his comments.
At least the bus drivers have not arrived by ship with shackles !!!!.

Another Indian chap that needs to adjust his meds I think. I never said anything about bus drivers. Try rereading the thread champ.

I did say that the BCCI and perhaps some of the Indian team were very bad sports. Chartering a plane to have it on standby if Harbijan (*sp) was found guilty is all the evidence I need.

Boo hoo.

 

[2020hindsight]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

I was disappointed to see Ricky Ponting continuing the argument that "we were right" and that Symonds was entitled to feel aggrieved.

When the judge made it clear that Symonds was more than 50% responsible for starting it.

Gee whatever happened to sportsmanship.

 

[Miner]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

Whose bush are we talking about here. Look mate i don't know ur sister or ur mother that well.

Dear Maliq

I am sure we can have some restraint on our comments and not to bring any one's mother or sister here. That was in my opinion was said in a very bad taste. If dog bites man, I am sure man is not expected to bite a dog too just for revenge.
IMO debate should be on healthy arguments and let us also learn some lessons what happened in the cricket ground.

Sorry , but let us play fair game .

Best wishes

 

[doctorj]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

When the judge made it clear that Symonds was more than 50% responsible for starting it.

Maybe he did start it - but when does 'starting it' make a racist attack acceptable?

He was not found guilty of it because it came down to Symonds word vs his. Not because it was proven he didn't say it. Ricky is doing the right thing by standing by his team mate. Why would Symonds lie???

If he was found not guilty for insufficient evidence, I have no problem with it. That's fair. If he was found not guilty because of blackmail and political pressure then I have a problem with it.

 

[2020hindsight]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

not certain it was "monkey" or " your mother is a .. (rest unsaid)"

But I notice the judge is disappointed in Harb - having a past record.
And everyone disappointed in everyone else etc etc.

I still understand that it was clear that Andrew Symonds initiated it by reacting to Harb innocently touching Lee on backside with bat - with an aggressive comment (i.e. by AS).

ALL SO BLUDY TRIVIAL SHEESH

c'mon Ricky - move on.

 

[Pommiegranite]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

Another Indian chap that needs to adjust his meds I think. I never said anything about bus drivers. Try rereading the thread champ.

I did say that the BCCI and perhaps some of the Indian team were very bad sports. <b>Chartering a plane to have it on standby if Harbijan (*sp) was found guilty is all the evidence I need.</b>

Boo hoo.

Evidence? Where? Please tell us you're not taking biased media reports as 'evidence'.

What I find very funny is that now that the roles are reversed and Tendulkar's word has instead been taken over Ponting's, it is now the Aussies who whinging.

I'm glad to see the 'custodians of the game' getting a reality check about how well respected their 'word' actually is.

This whole affair was basically a mishearing which the Australians won't buy, as it would make them look like a bunch of idiots.

If I was the BCCI, I would be demanding an apology from Ponting, or threaten to go home. Now that would be funny.

 

[doctorj]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

If I was the BCCI, I would be demanding an apology from Ponting, or threaten to go home. Now that would be funny.

And true to form.

The death of test match cricket.

 

[Maliq]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

Maybe he did start it - but when does 'starting it' make a racist attack acceptable?

He was not found guilty of it because it came down to Symonds word vs his. Not because it was proven he didn't say it. Ricky is doing the right thing by standing by his team mate. Why would Symonds lie???

If he was found not guilty for insufficient evidence, I have no problem with it. That's fair. If he was found not guilty because of blackmail and political pressure then I have a problem with it.

What racist comments are we talking about here??? Symonds couldn't even be sure if what bhajji said was the word "monkey" or tere "ma ki" (which translates into ur mothers!!!!). Whats the difference if hoggy calls everybody a bastard and bhajji says tere ma ki.

Why would Symonds LIE??? we not talking about anyone lying, just that Symonds is a stupid and childish. And Ponting's got his head so far up his ASS, that he took this up the umpires during the middle of the game when they weren't even sure whether what bhajji said was the word "monkey" or in hindi.

Shame on Ponting and his team for bringing the game into disrepute.

 

[Maliq]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

Whose bush are we talking about here. Look mate i don't know ur sister or ur mother that well.

Dear Maliq

I am sure we can have some restraint on our comments and not to bring any one's mother or sister here. That was in my opinion was said in a very bad taste. If dog bites man, I am sure man is not expected to bite a dog too just for revenge.
IMO debate should be on healthy arguments and let us also learn some lessons what happened in the cricket ground.

Sorry , but let us play fair game .

Best wishes

yeah I really tried restraining myself, but found it hard when I was compared to Satan himself. HAHA

Yeah and I think it was BUDDY that made that "Indian cricketers are bus drivers" comment, instead of DOCTOR. Thought would clear that up.

Alrte boys and girls, talk to ya later gotta go drive that TAXI now

 

[doctorj]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

What racist comments are we talking about here??? Symonds couldn't even be sure if what bhajji said was the word "monkey" or tere "ma ki" (which translates into ur mothers!!!!). Whats the difference if hoggy calls everybody a bastard and bhajji says tere ma ki.

What a load of bollocks. First HarbLucky_Countryan said nothing, then he was calling Symonds a monkey as a compliment and now he was saying something else altogther. Pull the other one. I get that there was no evidence, so the BCCI can claim anything they want and are clearly taking advantage of it. If he really was called a "ma ki", he would have apologised for the confusion straight away and explained it. Instead they denied it. The cricketing community didn't come down in the last shower.

Why would Symonds LIE??? we not talking about anyone lying, just that Symonds is a stupid and childish. And Ponting's got his head so far up his ASS, that he took this up the umpires during the middle of the game when they weren't even sure whether what bhajji said was the word "monkey" or in hindi.

After the last racism debacle, both teams were instructed by the match referee to report all racist comments. Symonds was the victim of a racist attack and per the rules Ponting informed the officials. Sucks to be caught out huh? You can't take the high moral ground on this one.

Shame on Ponting and his team for bringing the game into disrepute.

Sorry, the only ones bringing the game into disrepute are the BCCI and their cohorts.

And lets not forget, HarbLucky_Countryan has a history of exceedingly poor behaviour.
1998 - fined and reprimanded by South African match referee Peter van der Merwe for a breach of the players' code of conduct.
2000 - expelled from India's national cricket academy on disciplinary grounds
2001 - fined for dissent and attempting to intimidate umpires in South Africa
2003 - fined for abuse of umpires
2005 - fined for breach of players' code of conduct playing South Africa
2007 - escaped punishment abusive exchange with England's Kevin Pietersen when Harbhajan refused to budge after being bowled in a one-dayer last year.
2008 - found guilty of racially abusing Andrew Symonds, subsequently found guilty of a lesser charge on appeal.

 

[Happy]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

Not happy and not watching tonight.

This head gear of his, got some religious significance?

 

[rustyheela]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

5 /34 @ 7.39, win, HaHA!!!

 

[rustyheela]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

5 /34 @ 7.39, win, HaHA!!!

 

[2020hindsight]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

Looks like we're in for a game of 2010

Thought for the day
do we open with Gillie
or , given that its a walkover, give the new blood a bat (David Hussey etc) ?.

PS I reckon it's great to have the radio on - ABC - commentary by Kerry O'Brien and Hasha
Hell he's a funny man that Skull lol.

 

[2020hindsight]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

The captain of a team says to the Umpire, "My players want to know if there is a penalty for thinking." The Umpire says, "No." The captain says, "Well we think you're an asshole, then."
........
At the interval, everybody rushed to the bar, where local publican had thoughtfully provided a case of light ale. Unfortunately, the ale was off and halfway through the second innings, everyone was so ill that they abandoned the match. It was a case of bad light stopping play.

 

[Maliq]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

DOC u in ur own little dreamland buddy. U been poppin too many of them prescription pills eh...

After the last racism debacle, both teams were instructed by the match referee to report all racist comments. Symonds was the victim of a racist attack and per the rules Ponting informed the officials. ???

U serious?? Wake up from ur little haze.

SYMONDS sat down at the hearing and wasn’t even sure what bhajji said. KNOCK KNOCK anybody home in that head of urs.

Why do I get the feeling I am just repeating something I just posted earlier.

Sucks to be caught out huh?

HaHa, that’s funny. If I recall the only one caught out from this hearing is Symonds and Ponting. Read my last sentence again, again, again, and AGAIN before u reply to this.

I get that there was no evidence, so the BCCI can claim anything they want and are clearly taking advantage of it.

Why u keep bringing BCCI into this, forget about BCCI. Don’t even need to involve them, when Symmo isn’t sure as to what was said. The only one claiming anything was SYMONDS & Ponting. They couldn’t even back these claims at the hearing.

If he really was called a "ma ki", he would have apologised for the confusion straight away and explained it. Instead they denied it.

Buddy trust me u don’t need to apologize for saying “ma ki” on the cricket field. Hoggy would testify to that.

Bhajji should have walked free.

Denied it??
The only thing indian’s been denying ever since this whole thing started is the use of word “Monkey”. Sachin was down the other end, and IF I MAY QUOTE u POMMIEGRANITE “What I find very funny is that now that the roles are reversed and Tendulkar's word has instead been taken over Ponting's, it is now the Aussies who whinging".

As to avoiding the confusion – isn’t that what Sachin was doing at the crease when he was shaking his head and talking to the umpy's, and isn’t that what Kumble tried doing after the day’s play???

THe conversation would have gone something like this:

Ponting: Harbhajan called Symonds a MONKEY

Kumble: No Ricky ur mistaken he said tere “ma ki” (Kumbe pulls out a hindi to English dictionary under the M section, Ponting’s face goes red)

Ponting: Boohoo…. hooohoo… booo….. hooohoo…. Starts jumping up and down on the couch shouting: no he said monkey, ur going to court.

Kumble: cya in court Muna (child).

Harbhajan’s history?? U SERIOUS I can get u pages and pages of Australian playrs bad behaviour.

Catchphrase of the day is: “WHINGING AUSSIES”

 

[2020hindsight]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

Two old cricketers were talking in the club.
'What was your highest score?' 'A hundred and ten not out.'
'Mine was a hundred and twenty not out'.

'And what was the most number of wickets you took?'.
'Oh, no. This time you go first.'

 

[doctorj]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

DOC u in ur own little dreamland buddy.

Along with most of the Indian cricket team by the looks of it the way they played tonight.

I wonder if they had a plane on standby tonight in case they lost or HarbLucky_Countryan broke a nail.

 

[agro]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

did anyone else think that last nights game was staged?

i mean come on this score was too good to be true and whats with 2 indian players going to catch the same ball?? (nothing suss)?

anyhow, since the controversy i don't think they are playing fair and is most certainly match fixed

what u think?

 

[nomore4s]

Re: Australia vs India - Why India WILL WIN

did anyone else think that last nights game was staged?

i mean come on this score was too good to be true and whats with 2 indian players going to catch the same ball?? (nothing suss)?

anyhow, since the controversy i don't think they are playing fair and is most certainly match fixed

what u think?

Your kidding aren't you

After all the carry on there is no way the Idians would have thrown that match. And why bother?