- Joined
- 2 June 2011
- Posts
- 5,341
- Reactions
- 242
Lol... I just noticed that myself.
So you've got a contract announcement of sorts on the same day as an update on the legal dispute (which sounds more complicated than they are making it out to be).
I'd actually feel sorry for them if they made headway in the USA and it all unravelled due to patent / legal issues.
edit: I think it's too much of a possible torpedo (even if it is remote) to risk a long-term hold for me even if I was convinced re their competitive position.
Pretty much of the same opinion. I really don't understand how you can cite patent protection as one of your core competitive advantages then start manufacturing using your own capsule design. Will the existing patent holder not find someone else to license to? If it's that easy to create a legal design that doesn't breach patent then what's to stop everyone doing it, or why haven't Kinder Surprise already done it? There seems to be a lot going on that hasn't been made public.
My thesis entering this stock was that contracts needed to come on line quickly and I could more or less ride the revenue momentum. That hasn't eventuated and the legal stuff going on means I'm happy to not be in there anymore even with Walgreens on board.