Trembling Hand
Can be found on the bid
- Joined
- 10 June 2007
- Posts
- 8,852
- Reactions
- 205
Through more than three decades of systematic research, she has been figuring out answers to why some people achieve their potential while equally talented others don’t.............The key, she found, isn’t ability; it’s whether you look at ability as something inherent that needs to be demonstrated or as something that can be developed.
..zest for challenge helped explain why other capable students thought they lacked ability just because they’d hit a setback. Common sense suggests that ability inspires self-confidence. And it does for a while—so long as the going is easy. But setbacks change everything. Dweck realized—and, with colleague Elaine Elliott soon demonstrated—that the difference lay in the kids’ goals. “The mastery-oriented children are really hell-bent on learning something,” Dweck says, and “learning goals” inspire a different chain of thoughts and behaviors than “performance goals.”
http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2007/marapr/features/dweck.htmlThe most dramatic proof comes from a recent study by Dweck and Lisa Sorich Blackwell of low-achieving seventh graders. All students participated in sessions on study skills, the brain and the like; in addition, one group attended a neutral session on memory while the other learned that intelligence, like a muscle, grows stronger through exercise. Training students to adopt a growth mind-set about intelligence had a catalytic effect on motivation and math grades; students in the control group showed no improvement despite all the other interventions.
“Study skills and learning skills are inert until they’re powered by an active ingredient,” Dweck explains. Students may know how to study, but won’t want to if they believe their efforts are futile. “If you target that belief, you can see more benefit than you have any reason to hope for.”
...I think reading the links in Sails' post and combining the findings with those about deliberative effort is not a bad road to be on?
Ahhh.... there's hope for me yetHere's how long it took some smart and determined people to become profitable:
Linda Raschke - 3 years
John Carter - 4 years
Mark Fisher - 3 years
Hubert Senters - 2 years sitting by the side of an experienced trader before trading
Here's how long it took some smart and determined people to become profitable:
I have an 8 yr old granddaughter who has been struggling at school since she started in Grade 1. Sadly, she believed she was dumb and it was difficult to motivate her.
However, after reading that article, I have been relentless in my attempts to inspire her and have explained that the brain is like a muscle and will improve with effort.
The changes have been incredible - she now regularly gets 100% for her spelling tests each week and she is steaming ahead in all her subjects not to mention the improvement in her self esteem and confidence.
Thought I would share this as it has certainly confirmed in my mind the value of that article and how much our mindsets can affect us.
I agree with a lot of what TH has to say here. Although I think that the analytical skills and psychology that a successful trader uses are both things that can be learnt with practice. I don't think you can succeed without both. This video from Alex Wasilewski (head trader and co-founder of Puretick) sums up nicely what it takes to become a successful trader:
http://www.puretick.com/video/thetruth
Here's how long it took some smart and determined people to become profitable:
Linda Raschke - 3 years
John Carter - 4 years
Mark Fisher - 3 years
Hubert Senters - 2 years sitting by the side of an experienced trader before trading
Some food for thought eh?
If you don't understand markets, if you don't systematically prepare for trading, and if you haven't sufficiently rehearsed trading-related skills, you'll perform miserably and you'll become emotional.
Why reasonable smart and logical people apply thinking that in my experience is illogical and must be unique to the trading field.[/B][/U] It seems that the thinking and process of "I'm a sharp cookie at XYZ therefore I can jump in live with hard earned money and go up against pros and succeed" is unique to trading only.
I think that any profession based on logic and with some component of economics or statistics can do better than most traders with minimal practice. There is a lot of witchcraft in trading methods, and the punters like to claim skills that have simply been pulled out of the air with no scientific basis. Makes them feel important.
One reason why people that are successful in one endeavour have difficulty becoming successful in trading could be due to them overlooking the years of learning, effort and experience that they gained in order to be successful. They wouldn't forget that they started at the bottom and worked their way up, but now that they are successful, their business or endeavour is easily maintained with minimal effort.
Not many realise that trading is a very competitive business. Not only do they want to start trading at the top level, they assume that they only need put in a minimal effort to be successful.
Only the few with ambition and motivation to work towards their trading goals will get there.
Working on these skills."If you don't understand markets, if you don't systematically prepare for trading, and if you haven't sufficiently rehearsed trading-related skills, you'll perform miserably and you'll become emotional.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?