What is everyone perspective on the merits of a contrarian view on the state of the economy?
We all know that most mainstream economists, who studied Keynesian economics, never saw this coming.
Alternatives economists, including Steve Keen, did but was obviously ignored before then, and is still now.
In my opinion, it's very difficult to be one, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if he is eventually right. I certainly know the "track" record of these mainstream economists.
Which is probably true as his views are not accepted in the business or political world. Not only that, it is also impractical for the big financial firms to "act" on his advices. There are simply too much vested interests out there to take a contrary view. It's much easier to follow the herd than going against it.