- Joined
- 20 July 2021
- Posts
- 11,053
- Reactions
- 15,358
if you consider XRF as a 'tech stock ' rather than a 'mining services ' stock the logic makes perfect sense , it has ridden on the coat-tails of other 'growth stocks' ( some of whom can't even make a profit,even today )Amazing run! As I have said, it made no sense to me, I had deep inside experience and knowledge and I could not see the potential. Just shows there are lots of ways to be wrong in the investing business!
I guess the thing I try to remind myself of is that sins of omission are much less of a threat than sins of commission, meaning that missing out and my analysis and research turning out to be 100% wrong in this case is much better than when I have committed capital to buying a business where it turned out my analysis and research were 100% wrong!
i had similar success with PME using the same logic , and avoided the 'buy now pay later ' stocks on the logic that it would be hard to make a profit given all the salesmanship needed to establish market share ( had a couple of other holdings destroyed by outrageous travel expenses racked up by sales-teams )
for example i did very nicely on minnows stocks that via reverse take-oven morphed into 'crypto ( related ) stocks ( i also took the opportunity to exit when it turned 10 or 20 bagger mainly because they had virtually no earnings )
maybe a course in salesmanship ( spin-doctoring ) would help so you can look behind the gloss , an easy start would be looks at some of Marcus Padley's views on company presentations ( in general )
the masses often get enthralled in the narrative and bamboozled by the financials
now back to XRF in particular , has the 'growth story ' reached the peak ?
although i still hold XRF i have also taken out more than double my original investment cash along the way