I sent this off to WSA a while ago:
I am writing to advise my disgust with Western Areas' Board and their continuing cosying up to IGO at the expense of shareholders.
I will be lobbying other interested shareholders to join me in a class action against Western Areas and its incompetence in agreeing to a takeover when real industry experts - unlike KPMG - presently value the company considerably more than $4/share. It is well established that the nickel market has major supply problems, and these are not likely to improve as the incrementally increasing demand from the battery EV sector in particular has at least another decade to run.
The weight of evidence against KPMG's present opinion is exceptionally strong and should not be difficult to prove, especially seeing they badly botched their first effort. Additionally, while it was apparent that the market never thought IGO's initial offer was fair, and they themselves said they would not change it, they in fact have. The course of events has an element of "opportunism" running through.
A competent Board would not have been so eager to rush into another offer price with IGO and, instead, let WSA's shares trade for several months so that the market itself could guide a more fair and reasonable valuation.
Individual and long term shareholders are constantly disappointed when they see Directors always proposing their fees are increased or that other bonus arrangements are approved despite poor share price performance. In this case it appears we are being sold down the toilet when, instead, a market directed outcome would put an end to share price uncertainty and negate the need for me to take further action.
If you are of the same view, I welcome a message from you but won't be seeking anything more at this stage. I will be spending some time looking for cases where shareholders have taken similar actions to see what traction is available.