- Joined
- 11 April 2006
- Posts
- 294
- Reactions
- 0
Rafa said:TwoJacks, i know you are completly ANTI LABOUR...
But BSD has provided a very objective analysis that is definitely not pro labor...
I certainly agree with him... I would also like to add that the present day Liberals are Liberal in name only... They are one of the most interventionist govt's going around... just got to think of the FHOG, Baby Bonus, 30% health rebate, child care rebate, Fam Tax A, B, C, D, etc, etc... very Labouresq i might say... you only got to see the massive increase in business red tap, tax laws, both business and individual, etc, etc to see this!
This is one of the reason Labor look clueless in recent times, its cause major Liberal and Labor policies are almost identical, making Labor looks bereft on ideas... The Workplace Laws are the first time in the last 12 years that Labor actually has a chance to differentiate themselves from the Libs...
thats another topic in itself... so we won't get sidetracked...
Anyway...
Once the economy is opened up... free market, rates, fores, etc, (incidentally done by Labor) it doesn't matter who is incharge... the market takes care of it....
I vote for Politicians on the DOLE!!!
It would make more sense to have NO taxes..twojacks28 said:it makes sense to have one main tax instead of many separate taxes.
lukem said:It would make more sense to have NO taxes..
Why not?twojacks28 said:ahh no that is not possible.
I can see the benfits in less government but IMO there would be serious problems in a situation with no government. Apart from making laws, some of which are necessary for the functioning of a civilised society, there are some economic activities where private ownership just doesn't work.lukem said:It would make more sense to have NO taxes..
twojacks28 said:hahah you make me laugh rafa im not anti labor or anyone for that matter. the fact is that the government does influence the economy in a big way. since the liberal government took over years ago the economy has improved dramatically.
From the Editor of The Australian... (a definite pro-liberal paper...)
The prosperity Australians enjoy at present is in large part due to reforms put in place more than a decade ago by Paul Keating's national competition policy. Just as much as the China-led resources boom, it is those reforms that underpin Australia's record stretch of economic growth and the lowest unemployment rate for 30 years.
Rafa said:TwoJacks,
Its fair to say, and most commentators are now saying it, that its the reforms of the Keating era that have really made the big difference to Australia in the last 10 years...
In terms of reform, the Liberals have delivered...
1. Tax Reform: with the move away from Income tax, towards consumption tax...
2. IR Reform: with the move towards individually negotiated contracts as opposed to collective negotiations
3. Privatisation....
The results of these reforms are still to be fully realised... In fact, we are really not going to know if they are any good for at least the next 5 years or so...
Funnily enough, most of these reforms are driven by the PM Howard (unlike previously, when Keating as treasurer championed them)... To come back to the topic, Costello has not shown any prime ministerial qualities and ideas to indicate he would make a good PM!
My vote goes to Howard to stays on as PM...
Rafa said:Yes, time will certainly tell.
Just as we all thought Keating was a Dill and have now been proved incorect, the reforms of the last few years will come home to roost in the next 5- 10 years...
We'll wait and see...
Prospector said:Unfortunately. I think Peter would make a good PM, he just has this unfortunate air about him that comes off as smugness. Surely it is time for John Howard to go - without sounding like a Gen X'er (or is that a Y'er: ) I just think we need someone a little younger!
cant agree more.Prospector said:he just has this unfortunate air about him that comes off as smugness.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?