This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Will Craig Thomson finally give us some relief?

The government pulled off a stroke of genius with the high court judgement on the refugees.
It got Thomson off the front page of the newspapers. LOL LOL
 
In the Australian.
"Broke MP Craig Thompson planning $100,000 home extension."

It is interesting that Tim Lee, general manager of Fair Work Australia, has ben promoted to Commissioner. This is the guy who has been investigating claims against Thompson for 2 years.

Meanwhile Kathy Jackson who blew the whistle has been admitted to hospital- possibly for stress- a week after she received the threat.

Well this sums up how this government works.
I think over the weeekend a new pol will be taken and I am looking forward to the result.
joea
 
And yet another twist to this saga in a further seeming desperate to prevent the course of justice. Surely Mr Lee should have to step down from his new job until investigations have been completed?


Read full story from The Age by Ben Schneiders and Royce Millar:

Former head of Thomson inquiry to avoid scrutiny
 
Perhaps my previous post above, needs amendment in light of the revelations about Craig Thomson's $100,000 home extensions, a man saved from bankruptcy by his party................



........................


Not allowing union leaders to live high off their union members contributions is un-Australian.

And not allowing union leaders to have a root at a brothel in between $300 meals and $500 bottles of wine is a capitalist plot to deny workers the right to have spent their union dues as they see fit.

And not allowing former union members who become ALP members of parliament to commence house extensions of $100,000 subsequent to being recently bailed out of threatened bankruptcy by the ALP, is also un-Australian.

This thread is degenerating in to an anti-union rant.

Leave the unions out of this.

Leave Craig Thomson to the parliament.

gg
 
...Leave Craig Thomson to the parliament.

gg

sorry, GG. Not while Thomson receives his salary (or some of it) from taxpayer's funds. If he has fraudulently taken public money from the unions, then he's not fit to be representing his electorate, imo.
 
Sails, I've been assuming gg's remarks are very much tongue in cheek.
At least I certainly hope so.
 
Sails, I've been assuming gg's remarks are very much tongue in cheek.
At least I certainly hope so.

Moi?

There must be an election on the way, everyone is so anxious. A picture closer to what I really looked like when I posted the above.



gg
 
Moi?

There must be an election on the way, everyone is so anxious. A picture closer to what I really looked like when I posted the above.



gg


My apologies, gg...

I should have known better. ..

Hopefully there is an election on the way because a change of leadership back to Rudd isn't going to fix anything, imo.
 
My apologies, gg...

I should have known better. ..

Hopefully there is an election on the way because a change of leadership back to Rudd isn't going to fix anything, imo.

I agree sails.

It is not a good look for the country, the Indons, Chinese and others in the region must be wetting themselves laughing at the state of our nation, a quarry-ship with a crew of fools grappling with the helm.

gg
 
The opposition is vowing to keep up the pressure on Craig Thomson. What can they actually do now that NSW Police has categorically said there is no basis for a criminal investigation, and the expectation is that Victoria Police will find likewise?

Doesn't the opposition run the risk here of looking hysterical rather than reasonable?

A further point: Mr Thomson's wife is apparently due to give birth soon. The opposition have said they will not grant the government a pair if the birth occurs during the carbon tax debate, thus preventing Mr Thomson from being present at the birth of his child.

Is this reasonable?

The opposition has suggested that if the government chooses to schedule the carbon tax debate during the anticipated delivery time for Thomson Jnr, then that's their problem. Sounds sensible, or does it?

PS It's just possible the opposition might be doing Mrs Thomson a favour by preventing her husband attending the birth. Given his apparent interests of the bordello variety, she may well prefer alternative support at such a time.
 

The opposition did not say this.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/abbo...gives-birth-20110908-1jz5l.html#ixzz1XMaHRLdE
 
It never ceases to amaze me how right wing rags such as the Sydney Morning Herald pursue unions, unionists and workers in their hegemonist goals.

The latest rubbish to appear in that organ is an allegation that Craig Thomson and a Mr.Williamson when they were officers of that union, received American Express credit cards which were used inter alia for school fees.

The cards were supplied to the officers of the union it is alleged, by the publisher of the union's newsletter a Mr. Gilleland, who was paid it is alleged more than ten times the going rate for publishing the newsletter.


http://www.smh.com.au/national/thomson-new-credit-card-claims-20110908-1jzz2.html

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...