Whiskers
It's a small world
- Joined
- 21 August 2007
- Posts
- 3,266
- Reactions
- 1
but they haven't learnt... via the 45m contrib. to the Mersey Hospital and now their stupid plan for local boards... How the hell are local boards going to be able to look at the big picture. All they are going to be interested in is their own patch...
Rafa, I'm curious why you think the re-introduction of hospital boards, in Qld at least, won't work.
While not expert in the field, I can recall when we had local hospital boards and I think most people I know who can remember them, will say it was a better system. As I have heard it described, if they were re-introduced, the local boards would be made up of local medical professional, business and community members. This does away with most of the central bureaucracy and puts the responsibility for running the local hospitals as well as being accountable for any problems on the local community. The way I understand it they put in their applications for funding which is still largely decided at state and federal levels.
Rafa, I'm curious why you think the re-introduction of hospital boards, in Qld at least, won't work.
Where do you think the problem lies?
Well, for a start reducing the number of bureaucrats. I can't recall the actual percentages but Qld Health has about twice as many bureaucrats/administrative staff as they do health workers.
That is true. But every vote does count, unless you live in the USA. You could say the lesser of two evils... eh?It is very sad. No matter who I vote for I still just get a politician. I have come to detest both sides of politics. I need to ignore the splinter groups as they cannot govern.
So what happens? It comes down to 16 or so marginal seats. In other words my vote counts for absolutely nothing and I have to put up with whatever the various Kaths', Kims', Kels' and Sharrons' place on their ballot sheet.
Australia Votes:
http://www.youtube.com/australiavotes
Time to bin conspiracy theories
Hedley Thomas | October 12, 2007
ALL the conspiracy theories, inquisitions, cries of "cover-up" and attempts to link a document-shredding fiasco in Queensland in 1990 to the alleged rape of a teenage girl in 1988 and the political aspirations of Kevin Rudd can be consigned to the bin.
The disclosure today of documents, obtained under Freedom of Information laws, should silence the paranoiacs, some of whom have clung for 17 years to a beat-up known as the Heiner Affair/Shreddergate.
Their efforts have redoubled in recent weeks in a bid to make a connection to the Opposition Leader on the eve of a federal election.
...
Lindeberg has made hundreds of wild and woolly claims about top-level corruption which, he asserts, motivated the shredding. He and his boosters have shamelessly exploited the girl by claiming, falsely, that the shredding was linked to the alleged rape. They have pretended that the destruction of the documents thwarted her chance for justice.
But as today's disclosures show, the documents relating to the alleged rape were not destroyed. They were not even part of an incompetently constituted inquiry that former magistrate Noel Heiner was asked, in late 1989, to conduct into the staffing problems at the youth centre.
And when the alleged rape occurred, Rudd, who had been a diplomat for the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, was still a month away from starting in a new job as private secretary to the then Labor opposition leader in Queensland, Wayne Goss. Neither Rudd nor Goss had anything to do with a cover-up of the abuse of children.
But if Lindeberg and the assorted conspiracy theorists, among them Liberal and Nationals lightweights such as NSW opposition legal affairs spokesman Greg Smith and Queensland senator Barnaby Joyce, are determined to apportion blame, they could examine the government that was in power in 1988. It was led by a National Party premier in a coalition with the Liberal Party...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?