- Joined
- 18 September 2008
- Posts
- 4,041
- Reactions
- 1,185
I have always stated that though Hillary is far from being a saint, pretty much all of the allegations against her are invented by the republican right, extreme talk back radio hosts and other media, in particular Fox News. The reason charges have not being brought against her is that there is no evidence of wrong doing and investigations that have been made have exonerated her.
Now we are getting confirmation of this from the Facebook - Cambridge Analytica scandal.
Cambridge Analytica bosses claimed they invented 'Crooked Hillary' campaign, won Donald Trump the presidency
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-...d-it-secured-donald-trump-presidentia/9570690
And as to the role played by Fox News...
‘Ashamed’ Fox News Commentator Quits the ‘Propaganda Machine’
https://daringfireball.net/linked/2018/03/20/peters-fox-news
I have always stated that though Hillary is far from being a saint, pretty much all of the allegations against her are invented by the republican right, extreme talk back radio hosts and other media, in particular Fox News. The reason charges have not being brought against her is that there is no evidence of wrong doing and investigations that have been made have exonerated her.
Now we are getting confirmation of this from the Facebook - Cambridge Analytica scandal.
Cambridge Analytica bosses claimed they invented 'Crooked Hillary' campaign, won Donald Trump the presidency
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-...d-it-secured-donald-trump-presidentia/9570690
Can't add anything more to that denouncement.
Will be fascinating to see the Fox response.
How easily will the millions of people who have swallowed the "Crooked Hilary" lies hook, line etc reconsider their views?
How easily will the millions of people who have swallowed the "Crooked Hilary" lies hook, line etc reconsider their views?
And how readily will they reconsider their support for Donald Trump with a rapidly increasing list of law suits, exposes, family junkets coming out ?
Checkout Russian Roulette.
Russian Roulette review: as Joe Biden said, 'If this is true, it's treason'
Michael Isikoff and David Corn lay bare the evidence that Trump and Putin have been striving to collaborate for years
Tue 20 Mar 2018 14.03 EDT First published on Tue 20 Mar 2018 02.00 EDT
Shares
14k
Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump share a moment in Vietnam. Photograph: Mikhail Klimentyev/Tass
Whenever I finish a book like Russian Roulette, I ask myself the same question: why is anyone still debating whether there was collusion between the Russians and Donald Trump?
It was 2013 when Trump first tweeted that he wanted to be Putin’s “best friend”. Later he told Fox Putin looked “like a great leader”. Putin’s constant goals have been to destroy Nato and the EU. Trump was a big advocate of Brexit, which was a body blow to the EU, and in the 2016 campaign he called Nato “obsolete”. Trump began visiting Moscow in 1987 and his on again, off again effort to build a Trump Tower there continued for three decades – right through the presidential election.
In 2006, Trump became executive producer of a Russian version of The Apprentice. Years later he dismissed the massive evidence that Putin routinely orders the murder of journalists and other dissidents, telling MSNBC: “I haven’t seen that. I don’t know that he has. Have you been able to prove that?”
Then of course there’s the Palm Beach estate he bought for $45m in 2004. After the housing bubble burst, he sold that house for $95m – to a Russian oligarch, Dmitry Rybolovlev.
Nearly all the other stations of the twisted Trump-Russian cross are covered here, including the famous Trump Tower meeting between Russian emissaries and Donald Trump Jr, Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner. Although the Russians failed at that moment to produce promised dirt on Hillary Clinton, the authors point out that “Trump’s senior advisers now had new reason to believe that Putin’s regime wanted Trump to win and was willing to act clandestinely to boost his chances. The campaign did not report this private Russian outreach to the FBI.”
Russian government officials, Corn and Isikoff write, could well have “interpreted that as a signal that Trump would not mind or protest if Moscow took other actions to benefit the Republican candidate. The Russians had offered to help, and Trump’s campaign had demonstrated a willingness to take what Moscow had to offer.”
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/mar/20/russian-roulette-review-donald-trump-joe-biden-treason
Can't add anything more to that denouncement.
Will be fascinating to see the Fox response.
"Fox has degenerated from providing a legitimate and much-needed outlet for conservative voices to a mere propaganda machine for a destructive and ethically ruinous administration," wrote Ralph Peters, a Fox News "strategic analyst."
Ummm, so he's complaining that Fox News was legitimate at some stage ....when would that have been?
I think it was 1776 if I remember rightly.Ummm, so he's complaining that Fox News was legitimate at some stage ....when would that have been?
The difference between Fox News and the our abc is you can choose not to pay for it!
Ah there you are... Had to scroll through endless bas hit pieces to find some actual comment.And the ABC has to try to appeal to everyone, not just the Cory Bernadis and Pauline Hansons.
3) The World Trade War got off to a flying start with China announcing it's response to Donald Trumps tariff measures. The stock markets are suitably impessed.
China promises to hit US with tariffs as stocks plunge amid fear of trade war
Asian shares fall after Donald Trump’s announcement of higher duties on Chinese imports, as Beijing appeals for talks
Martin Farrer and Benjamin Haas
Thu 22 Mar 2018 22.04 EDT First published on Thu 22 Mar 2018 21.35 EDT
Shares
97
Comments
364
Asian markets fell sharply on Friday after a 3% in the Dow Jones in New York. Photograph: Xinhua/REX/Shutterstock
China has retaliated against Donald Trump’s decision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminium by signalling that it will hit US goods such as pork, apples and steel pipe with higher duties.
As Asian stock markets plunged at the prospect of a trade war between the world’s two biggest economies, China’s commerce ministry urged Washington to negotiate a settlement as soon as possible but set no deadline.
A ministry statement on Friday said the higher US tariffs “seriously undermine” the global trading system.
“The Chinese side urges the US side to resolve the concerns of the Chinese side as soon as possible,” the ministry said. It appealed for dialogue “to avoid damage to overall Chinese-US cooperation.”
The Dow Jones industrial average dropped 724 points, or nearly 3%, after Trump’s announcement on Thursday, and Asian markets followed suit in Friday’s session.
https://www.theguardian.com/busines...riffs-as-stocks-plunge-amid-fear-of-trade-war
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?