- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,356
- Reactions
- 17,704
How did you calculate that?We are the biggest per capita carbon burners
We are a country the size of a continent, sheer logistics mean we will pollute on a higher per capita basis. We are not the size of Japan, Italy or NZ even. Our population isn't going to double in the next 100 years and with the industrialisation of Africa, China, India to name a few, i am betting others per capita pollution will rise and ours will stay stagnant.
The reduction target is small, the costs are huge and as i have stated before we will be purchasing tens of billions of dollars per annum overseas for the right to use our own resources, it's insanity. Not to mention the UN tax grab.
Don't worry SC once the Chinese start buying iron ore from the Congo, they will be wetting their pants laughing. That is the benefit of an emerging nation over one that is full of it's self importance. Meanwhile, i am sure that the Congo will be a recipient of our 10% carbon tax donation to the UN, to 'help' third world nations manage their carbon emissions. Geeeee i can't see any money going astray in the African nations, they are all so anti-corruption.
Humans contribute 3.8% of global carbon in the atmosphere, of that 3.8% we contribute 1.3% and of that 1.3% we want to reduce it by 5%. Do the maths and see how much that will change global atmosphere. It's absurd.
The US sure as hell aren't going to buy it.
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index....ecord_id=d5c3c93f-802a-23ad-4f29-fe59494b48a6
I am not saying the world will end, but Australia will sure as hell have a sore foot from shooting itself.
It was Mark Riley of channel 7, the infamous idiot who challenged Tony Abbott a few months ago about his "**** happens" remark in Afghanistan or Iraq. Mr Riley was subsequently widely criticised and even the government agreed Mr Abbott's comments had been totally misrepresented by Mark Riley.Who was that obnoxiously servile reporter in the Canberra press gallery asking Gillard for advice on what to write?:bowdown: Thank God for The Australian
I'm not, would you care to provide some evidence to this claim ?
I can only assume you are being provocative here, rather than simply ignorant in the shift of support for AGW.Acceptance of the science by whom ? By you ?
Thank you Ruby. OK now, Rand? Hopefully next time you'll have a look at a few facts before making a post.RandR - do some reading. There are numerous references to this on the other threads - the Climate Hysteria one and the Carbon Tax Lie one. It was admitted by the Labour government that the 'per capita emission' figures included our exports - which of course makes a complete nonsense of the figures.
See above. I gave a reference on one of the other sites to 900 peer reviewed reports written by climate change sceptics. Also look at the Joanna Nova site. For goodness sake, inform yourself of the facts before you form your opinions!!
To reduce our emissions by 5% is like spitting in the wind, and yet Gillard is willing to put people out of jobs (eg talks of closure of one power station already), risk our current reliable power source for renewables that are generally more costly and reliability is questionable, risk the Aussie economy for a spit in the wind and that?
The cure seems many times worse than the disease even IF it does exist.
It was Mark Riley of channel 7, the infamous idiot who challenged Tony Abbott a few months ago about his "**** happens" remark in Afghanistan or Iraq. Mr Riley was subsequently widely criticised and even the government agreed Mr Abbott's comments had been totally misrepresented by Mark Riley.
In other words, a grub.
Isn't it to raise funds for alternative energy research and development?So we come back to the quuestion...why the hell is she doing this? Why would she want to destroy our competitive edge in fossil fuels. There can be only one answer. To keep the Greens on side.
Just to follow this type of thinking thru...if all country's simply waited for others to lead then how would anything happen? funny how this appeals to so many coalition voters...the do nothing approach to government.
Isn't it to raise funds for alternative energy research and development?
Isn't it to raise funds for alternative energy research and development?
While families are bracing themselves for further increases in prices and interest rates, the government is showing no signs of making any similar effort to cut back. Quite the opposite – since 2007 the government has expanded the public service by, on average, 6,000 a year, (that would be 24,000 more public servants) including 200 in Julia Gillard’s own department over the next financial year.
According to the latest annual report, there are 1027 public servants working for the Department of Climate Change alone. You need a significant workforce when you impose a failed pink batts scheme on Australian households and then have to try and clean it up. You also need a big workforce when you are preparing to tax Australians even more through a carbon tax. And how could I forget the government’s $13.7 million carbon tax ad campaign that is sure to keep all of those people busy.
Abbott might not be perfect, but at least the libs know how to manage the economy.
They did in the past, but now?
A "direct action" plan that may even be even worse than the carbon tax.
Ridiculous and unaffordable lengths of paid maternity leave.
Joe Hockey at the helm of the economy.
As the title of the thread says, where the hell are we heading, even when we change government?
Isn't it to raise funds for alternative energy research and development?
They did in the past, but now?
A "direct action" plan that may even be even worse than the carbon tax.
Ridiculous and unaffordable lengths of paid maternity leave.
Joe Hockey at the helm of the economy.
As the title of the thread says, where the hell are we heading, even when we change government?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?