IFocus
You are arguing with a Galah
- Joined
- 8 September 2006
- Posts
- 7,479
- Reactions
- 4,482
Big miners tip $750 million into fund to pay for 'legacy' infrastructure and social projects
Mark McGowan establishes an investment trust funded by the state's most prominent resource companies to realise 'legacy projects'.www.abc.net.au
This is 100% pure corruption in my opinion. Infrastructure projects should not be paid for from a government slush fund funded by major industry players. It should be funded by an increased royalty revenue applied equally across the board.
It really would be more efficient if Western Australia just become a division of BHP or woodside. Doesn't matter who gets voted in the mining lobby owns them all.
"It's unusual in a state which has a $6 billion surplus for the Premier to be going cap in hand to these mining companies and not expecting anything in return...Perhaps this gives the government the opportunity to use the $6 billion its got in the Premier's back pocket to spend on the basics he's failing on like health, housing, cost of living initiatives for Western Australians."
Ask Brendan Grylls about increasing royalty revenue.