I also noticed an error in the above post. The following should have read: "The concept that open P&L isn't real should not be taken as completely true."
Warr87 is this something that you have tested and that makes a real difference to your system? I remember listening to Nick Radge's most recent interview on Chat With Traders and he talks about having tested a time stop, e.g. if a stock doesn't move X percent in N days then it gets cut. He actually found it was detrimental to his system performance because when the market consolidated, like it is now, so did the leaders that they were already in. They didn't move up, but they also didn't pull back much either. They would have ended up actually getting out of the leading stocks because they didn't move up enough during their consolidation period to avoid getting triggered by the time stop. Some food for thought.My stale exit is actually one of my better performing positions but it hasn't really moved much hence why it has triggered.
Can you tell me what the ticker is, or would you rather wait until the position is sold?my original testing was without a stale exit. honestly can't remember exactly the difference in results. the position to be cut is +40% right now but hasn't moved in value for 10weeks. i guess holding on might yield a bigger winner. it is something to look into. consolidation is definitely something to consider.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?