- Joined
- 14 December 2009
- Posts
- 882
- Reactions
- 1
Is the condensed version.
BRU chart tells a tremendous story.
I have highlighted "some" of the story and its participants.
I'm happy to run a commentary but thought some may wish to have a go before I do.
Remember a chart cannot/will not advance unless
Supply is withdrawn
Or
Supply is overcome by demand.
What we look for is EFFORT what is it (participants) trying to do?
Is it (Participants) succeeding?
CLICK TO EXPAND.
View attachment 46400
It doesn't look to me like one I would enter. That huge upthrust type bar looks like a sell off. I'd want to see a few more days' action if I was to change my opinion. Is there something beyond the obvious here?
Ill do a full analysis in VSA on the marked chart this weekend sometime.
BUT
New highs on lowish volume is a strong sign that there is no supply at resistance.
So participants are holding their stock.
Hi tech, can you give me some idea of the success rate of VSA? Many people on this forum say when looking at a system find out the P/L, expectancy, maxDD etc.
I'm not Tech but I can guess his answer. Its not a system its an approach to analysis. Therefore you cannot give any stats as to its performance.
Correct.
The sizzle keeps being pedaled and the pundits keep buying it without knowing if when they apply it it will give them an edge.
For me it does.
For many it frustrates.
I'm not Tech but I can guess his answer. Its not a system its an approach to analysis. Therefore you cannot give any stats as to its performance.
Someone using VSA over long period must have some basic stats or even feel for its performance. It may vary from person to person depending on their skill, which is why i'd like to here from someone who uses it effectively - when entering a trade based on VSA, based on your past experience, what is the probability of the analysis being correct and the trade moving into profit? If Tech has taken 1000 (for example) trades based on VSA he must have some idea of how profitable (as a %) those trades have been?
Tech/a
The peddler does not require stats. because the he is exceptionally good salesman.
Selling "snow to the eskimo's", or "Carbon tax" to the Australian voter, this is the guy to call.
joea
Gavin Holmes.
Ah, yep Gavin. Thanks Tech.
I should add, i have TG and I think it has merit. But the marketing machine can be a bit off-putting. I'll keep persisting. My interest and question in this thread is really because I wonder what the ultimate goal is? Taking a step back from the marketing what is a realistic expectation compared to systems with a known expectancy? Thanks for your responses Tech.
I have Tradeguider, I'm new to it and probably not putting in as much time as I should (or as much as Pavilion for example), but I'm not in a rush so happy to plod along just reading/watching seminar recordings on the bus to work. In reality I have debt that takes priority, but I know that at some point I won't and the money that's has been going to it will have to go somewhere useful. I'm taking my time now to come up with a plan for that day.
Tradeguider is something I will persist with because I am learning, which is something I enjoy. Just the "beware the news" advice is probably worth the $500 I paid. But I do wonder if I will ever use all the VSA knowledge in my plan. VSA through their software seems time consuming to narrow down candidate stocks and very dependant on the individuals interpretation. When a trade goes wrong the experts are quick to say it was an error in interpretation ("clearly there was still some selling in that bar..."), rather than just say we have X% success. The implication is that when you're good enough (maybe some more cour$es??) you'll be right all the time!
It's definitely not mechanical! How big is the 'edge' for all the time involved?
So here is my thinking: Tradeguider recommends we wait until a trend is in place (for 3 bars) after a low/high. So it is trend following (actually trend following in multiple timeframes if we follow their recommendation). They also recommend we trade in harmony with the index, so we have a form of (discretionary) index filter in place. This could just as easily be a EMA/ROC on the XAO to simplify. Tradeguider recommends we have a plan and we stick to it. The VSA software generates Chandelier stops we are told to use. All good advice.
So even without any VSA signals we have a trend following system not totally dissimilar to the 20% Flipper out of Nick Radges book. Except we have chandelier stops rather than fixed %, and we are looking at more than 1 time frame for the trend. We are also shorting falling stocks (not long only). Could this all be an improvement on the "Flipper"? Would it be unreasonable to assume that if the stocks fitting these criteria were selected AT RANDOM without even looking at the VSA signal we should get a CAGR of 30% (al-la the flipper)? Potentially more because of the added criteria?
My question is, if we add the VSA methodology to these "trend following" rules, do we get an edge?
On your point of automating VSA signal into a system, the easiest to start with would have to be End of a Rising Market (narrow spread, close in the middle 3rd of the bar, very high OR very low volume, on a high into "fresh new ground", say 50 bars)? Or Buying/Selling Climaxes, then change in trend to confirm. Apparently they don't happen too often, so having Amibroker keeping an eye out for you would be handy, just in case you're not looking at the right stock at the right time.
Have you considered getting the trial of the "add-in studies" and just using their indicators for some testing?
So even without any VSA signals we have a trend following system not totally dissimilar to the 20% Flipper out of Nick Radges book. Except we have chandelier stops rather than fixed %, and we are looking at more than 1 time frame for the trend.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?