Hi PVF, sorry about the delay in responding. I am a worker so have to concentrate on that most of the time. I cannot really answer your question as I tend to concentrate on the Phils where I have a small understanding. I think however that it is fair to say that many small Aus resource stocks operating overseas are heavily discounted due to perceived geo-political risk but I am not sure that it can be regarded as country specific. In the Phils, there is clearly a sense of "terrorist" risk, especially southern Mindanao, and local land owner/community risk, on top of the red tape (bureaucracy) and the inevitable "commissions" that apply in getting things done. The other aspect is of course whether land or tenement ownership can occur, together with foreign company restrictions.Then of course the usual things like infrastructure requirements, capex and so on. I suppose many investors weigh it all up then shy away towards more certainty. I am not sure how you would weigh up the actual risks versus a discounted share price as this might also depend on the "marketing" output of a company. To give an example, RED has not been particularly brilliant in the feed of information to investors imo whereas I believe that MML has done this very well. At the same stage of development, if my memory serves me correctly, MML was at a considerably higher price than where RED is today. That does not mean that management is not experienced or not good,but that a more conservative approach is being taken. Of course as a shareholder I am always wanting to hear good news that might propel the SP higher. So I think there is a heck of a lot more to it than specific country geo political risks. But in saying that, others will disagree I am sure. Good luck with RED. AB