Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 13,691
- Reactions
- 10,297
Just to add in to the scenarios there are actually four. Because if Trump wins there is every likelihood that the democrats don't accept the result.I’d be interested in other members thoughts on this event which is just a few weeks away. It is a known event with just two possible outcomes or maybe three if Harris wins and Trump decides she didn’t. But let’s not go there for the moment.
gg
High tariffs aren't going to be worn by foreign nations like the EU with no consequences, USA free trade treaties will be cancelled.I'll buyit. from a recent newsletter, that might have come across the Gumnut Family Office desk, recently?
"... According to the Election Betting Odds tracker which consolidates the odds from 5 major bookmakers, Trump now has a 53% chance of winning, and Harris has a 46.4% chance. As recently as 5 October Harris was the favourite.
What are the investment implications of a Trump win?
If the 2016 investment playbook is any guide, U.S smaller companies should perform well…lower taxes, less regulation and improved business sentiment etc.
The Russell 2000 Index of smaller companies ... which looks like it wants to head higher, and we could see it exceeding its 2021 high. Investors, as we all know, are generally underweight smaller companies and I envisage many will look to increase their exposures in the months ahead.
Some months back, and when Biden was still in the race, we examined the impact of a likely Trump victory and stated that smaller companies would be a beneficiary.
We also saw a steepening of the U.S yield curve, as Trump’s economic policies are clearly inflationary, coupled with ever rising budget deficits and debt.
Neither Trump nor Harris have demonstrated any fiscal discipline, but Trump’s fiscal policies are arguably more stimulatory and inflationary.
In addition, we have the prospect of Trump’s much-loved tariffs... ..."
sadly , i believe you are correct ( despite i desperately hope you are wrong )Just to add in to the scenarios there are actually four. Because if Trump wins there is every likelihood that the democrats don't accept the result.
I think there's going to be political trouble/violence no matter who wins.
but the ultra=wealthy ( and others ) have the assets wrapped up in foundations , trusts , charities etc etc etcHigh tariffs aren't going to be worn by foreign nations like the EU with no consequences, USA free trade treaties will be cancelled.
Also the tax breaks proposed mainly effect the wealthy, the middle class will take a big hit. USA will suffer from inflation and the world will be in danger of a major recession.
The effect of tariffs without tax cuts is effectively a consumption tax. The tax cuts are mainly for the ultra wealthy so yes, the middle class will get it in the neck.but the ultra=wealthy ( and others ) have the assets wrapped up in foundations , trusts , charities etc etc etc
'taxing the rich ' essentially means squeezing the middle class harder , those who are wealthy and don't NEED to live in the US migrate ( just like they are doing in the UK and France )
Both candidates are committed to a lower gasoline price at the pump so whether the oil price stays where it is or gets lower will affect our oil producers.
This also popped up a couple of days ago which might have given uranium companies a lift.
I'm not sure if Chris Bowen pays attention to these things though.
View attachment 186086
WASHINGTON, D.C. — As part of the Biden-Harris Administration’s Investing in America agenda, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today opened applications for up to $900 million in funding to support the initial domestic deployment of Generation III+ (Gen III+) small modular reactor (SMR) technologies. DOE plans to use this funding—made possible in part by President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law—to spur the safe and responsible deployment of advanced reactor technologies across the country and encourage follow-on reactor projects to support our nation's ambitious climate goals and meeting the growing demand for clean, reliable, and affordable power. Today’s announcement aims to assist the private sector in establishing a credible and sustainable pathway to deploying a fleet of Gen III+ SMRs across the country that advances environmental protection and community benefits, creates new, good-paying, high-quality jobs, and reinforces America’s leadership in the nuclear industry.
“Revitalizing America’s nuclear sector is key to adding more carbon free energy to the grid and meeting the needs of our growing economy—from AI and data centers to manufacturing and healthcare,” said U.S. Secretary of Energy Jennifer M. Granholm. “Thanks to the President and Vice President’s Investing in America agenda, the nation’s nuclear industry is poised to lead the world in innovative advanced reactor technologies, which will create high-paying jobs while providing the flexible and reliable clean energy we need to support a thriving clean energy future.”
for eg ....Trump is up 11 points in heavily Latino Miami Dade County in Florida.Even where Harris has won expected states, her margins are less than Bidens' were in 2020. If I could place aa bet now I'd put it on Trump to win.
However, it is early days as most results are from more Trump leaning states.
Wall St. is punting on a Trump win.
gg
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?