- Joined
- 15 September 2004
- Posts
- 364
- Reactions
- 2
Now that I have you attention WayneL I have some questions for you....
This topic has been discussed here;
https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=625
Financial markets have been debating the dire situation of the US economy for a while now (despite what Greenspan says), specifically the twin defecits (fiscal and current account) and how they continue to grow. Month by month the argument 'yes, its all going to sh*t' appears to be gaining traction. For a detailed view from a harvard trained economist for the affirmative read;
http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/91200
I haven't read the whole article yet, its pretty big. Some of you may get a headache reading it - I now truly understand why economics was classed as a language rich subject in school......
My simplistic view on the US situation...... Debt is bad. More specifically debt for consumption is bad, debt for investment can be good. The US appear to have embarked and continue to embark on debt for consumption. Some examples of this are;
(1) It appears the main motivation of the significant lender (China), is to ensure yanks keep buying their stuff.
(2) One of the main crises America seems to be facing is obesity. Borrow money to get fat, then borrow money to buy gym equipment from infomercials to take it off (I'm being harsh here!)
(3) Tax cuts to everyone
(4) War on Iraq (Note: its debatable whether the war in Iraq would be classed as investment or consumption - depending on how cynical you are on oil and politics )
Debt for consumption does not add any value and can only go on for so long. Its like living beyond your means, until one day you have to 'face up batsman'. I have also held the personal unsubstantiated view that Globalisation 'should' act as an equilibrium to living standards across the globe. If capital has no boundaries or allegiances then it will flow where it can get the best return. Will it flow to the lazy/expensive/comfortable or desperate/cheap/commited? Yes globalisation could result in higher living standards for all, but I think it also put immense pressure to close the gap on living standards around the globe - but i'm getting off track here....
WayneL if you were wondering where the questions were - here they are... I'm interested in you view because you seem to have a lot of experience, particularly in the American markets, and you are known as one of the Beariest of Bears around here.
Why do you have such a Beary view of the US situation?
Did you form it just from reading stuff around the net, or more indepth?
How many of the people in your trading circles have the same view?
Can you point me to your most convincing articles?
Given the 'turns to sh*t' scenario eventuates, you have mentioned before that you have a plan incase....
How do you think the situation will unravel if it does eventuate?
Would you care to discuss/disclose you plan to the members of ASF?
I'll be expecting a response by tomorrow morning
This will take a while to discuss, i'm obviously not expecting a response all in one post
Cheers
TJ
This topic has been discussed here;
https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=625
Financial markets have been debating the dire situation of the US economy for a while now (despite what Greenspan says), specifically the twin defecits (fiscal and current account) and how they continue to grow. Month by month the argument 'yes, its all going to sh*t' appears to be gaining traction. For a detailed view from a harvard trained economist for the affirmative read;
http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/91200
I haven't read the whole article yet, its pretty big. Some of you may get a headache reading it - I now truly understand why economics was classed as a language rich subject in school......
My simplistic view on the US situation...... Debt is bad. More specifically debt for consumption is bad, debt for investment can be good. The US appear to have embarked and continue to embark on debt for consumption. Some examples of this are;
(1) It appears the main motivation of the significant lender (China), is to ensure yanks keep buying their stuff.
(2) One of the main crises America seems to be facing is obesity. Borrow money to get fat, then borrow money to buy gym equipment from infomercials to take it off (I'm being harsh here!)
(3) Tax cuts to everyone
(4) War on Iraq (Note: its debatable whether the war in Iraq would be classed as investment or consumption - depending on how cynical you are on oil and politics )
Debt for consumption does not add any value and can only go on for so long. Its like living beyond your means, until one day you have to 'face up batsman'. I have also held the personal unsubstantiated view that Globalisation 'should' act as an equilibrium to living standards across the globe. If capital has no boundaries or allegiances then it will flow where it can get the best return. Will it flow to the lazy/expensive/comfortable or desperate/cheap/commited? Yes globalisation could result in higher living standards for all, but I think it also put immense pressure to close the gap on living standards around the globe - but i'm getting off track here....
WayneL if you were wondering where the questions were - here they are... I'm interested in you view because you seem to have a lot of experience, particularly in the American markets, and you are known as one of the Beariest of Bears around here.
Why do you have such a Beary view of the US situation?
Did you form it just from reading stuff around the net, or more indepth?
How many of the people in your trading circles have the same view?
Can you point me to your most convincing articles?
Given the 'turns to sh*t' scenario eventuates, you have mentioned before that you have a plan incase....
How do you think the situation will unravel if it does eventuate?
Would you care to discuss/disclose you plan to the members of ASF?
I'll be expecting a response by tomorrow morning
This will take a while to discuss, i'm obviously not expecting a response all in one post
Cheers
TJ