- Joined
- 23 November 2004
- Posts
- 3,974
- Reactions
- 850
sure, but I understand it is one thing to be bullied on the workplace, but in that case, I assume these guys are on camp so 24/7 pressure until your plane land back in Perth..
There is a role for unions, why are unions the equivalent of bikie clubs here is Oz ; something i do not understand.
The convict psyche? SirRumpole, any idea?
I'm not a great union man, but there are some unions that are militant and power hungry, others that are corrupt, and others that have a genuine interest in the welfare of their members, and you can't tar them all with the same brush.
I mean , we could call the NSW Bar Association and the A.M.A. unions. They may not like the word, but somehow they seem to get on better with Conservative governments that the Builder's Labourers or the CFMEU.
Whether a union is good or bad depends on whose interests it serves.
If it's Bankers Assc., or Business councils and the like... those are good unions getting together to advise gov't on how best to grow the economy and create jobs and growth and jobs and innovation.
If it's workers' unions... well we all know it's management that does the work and unions are just there to stop innovation and destroy jobs and slow growth.
Strange that when CEO or management screws up or just plain corrupt, it's just a bad CEO; When union reps. are corrupt or bad, all unions are bad and should be banned.
Churches and Boy Scouts are natural attractants to Pedophiles;
Theatre, Stage and TV are natural attractants to Homosexuals and Jews;
Public Service sends out pheromones to entice the less inventive and ordered amongst us;
Union leadership roles attract those with a score to settle with blood sucking leeches;
Party politicians are arrogant self serving 4rse7oles who join a political union that best makes a path to the gravy train.
All of them form a union of similar interests of some sort
you can't tar them all with the same brush.
I'm not a great union man, but there are some unions that are militant and power hungry, others that are corrupt, and others that have a genuine interest in the welfare of their members, and you can't tar them all with the same brush.
Funniest union-related thing I've ever seen (not where I work now) was management realising how badly they'd messed up and then asking, of all people, a union if they had any solutions to the rather serious dilemma being faced. The union promptly contacted the members and a solution was put forward to management the same day.
Very true and it also varies within the same union depending on who is running it at the time.
Best = people who have actually done the jobs the union's members do and who have no political aspirations beyond running a union.
Worst = those who haven't a clue what the members actually do at work and are only in it to advance their own interests with politics the end goal.
One day management and staff will realise that they are all on the same side when it comes to the success of an organisation and they need to communicate more with each other and not just assume the traditional roles of master and Skave.
Churches and Boy Scouts are natural attractants to Pedophiles;
Theatre, Stage and TV are natural attractants to Homosexuals and Jews;
Public Service sends out pheromones to entice the less inventive and ordered amongst us;
Union leadership roles attract those with a score to settle with blood sucking leeches;
Party politicians are arrogant self serving 4rse7oles who join a political union that best makes a path to the gravy train.
All of them form a union of similar interests of some sort
A couple of those unions managed to convinced the rest that whatever it is they do, they do it for the national interest; do it to serve the masses. And the masses said, dam straight.
Roosters doing what roosters do in the hen house....some just parade themselves as better because they have bigger tail feathers and redder combs. Now and again some hens think they are equal to the task of the naturally apoplectic roosters ...FAIL
Roosters doing what roosters do in the hen house....some just parade themselves as better because they have bigger tail feathers and redder combs. Now and again some hens think they are equal to the task of the naturally apoplectic roosters ...FAIL
Ah, now I know what Julia Gillard was talking about, very misogynist.
Highlights it to a tee.
I do not deny this you need counter power and I saw great cooperation for the better of both employees and company in Germany, but what i see here on TV, marches in Brisbane, etc is not that "intelligent" and is based on us vs them.There's good and bad with unions as with anything.
I do not deny this you need counter power and I saw great cooperation for the better of both employees and company in Germany, but what i see here on TV, marches in Brisbane, etc is not that "intelligent" and is based on us vs them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?