- Joined
- 14 March 2006
- Posts
- 3,630
- Reactions
- 5
I agree with Uncle. You would cook in a shipping container. I worked at QRX for years loading shipping containers for export. In summer all the blokes would lose a ton of weight in body salts from just a day of labour.
I partially agree with Snake. I think Aboriginal people have traditionally managed the land and have for millenia known about the harshness of bush fire in Australia.
As for fire-proof bunkers I really can't give any in-depth knowledge like that posted by Uncle.
But I do know that if a fire-proof bunker was to be constructed on a property, it wouldn't be advisable for anyone to use the old-growth timbers situated next to the water-catchments of Victoria such as the Thompson, Cardinia, Yan Yean or Sylvan dams (All very proximate to where this tragedy has occured) as building materials. I'm sure they would be just as flammable as any other material in a wildfire.
I'm sure if more of an effort was made by the Vic Govt for the last couple of decades, to leave the trees lying next to the catchments in the ground. After all those catchments do need there drop or two of precipitation to maintain life. Then probably Victoria's dwindling water resources, drought and resultant water restrictions would not have resulted in the terrible destruction of the beautiful landscape of Victoria we have seen over the previous week.
The drought is a reality and the worst thing that has been done in Victoria
is to log next to the catchments. I'm no scientist by do remember simple stuff from high school. There is no point to precipitate an event by messing with the precipitation cycle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precipitation_(meteorology)
Just mydata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35de1/35de176c02564355a2b73014bc1179ebd13dfc71" alt="Two Cents :2twocents :2twocents"
I partially agree with Snake. I think Aboriginal people have traditionally managed the land and have for millenia known about the harshness of bush fire in Australia.
As for fire-proof bunkers I really can't give any in-depth knowledge like that posted by Uncle.
But I do know that if a fire-proof bunker was to be constructed on a property, it wouldn't be advisable for anyone to use the old-growth timbers situated next to the water-catchments of Victoria such as the Thompson, Cardinia, Yan Yean or Sylvan dams (All very proximate to where this tragedy has occured) as building materials. I'm sure they would be just as flammable as any other material in a wildfire.
I'm sure if more of an effort was made by the Vic Govt for the last couple of decades, to leave the trees lying next to the catchments in the ground. After all those catchments do need there drop or two of precipitation to maintain life. Then probably Victoria's dwindling water resources, drought and resultant water restrictions would not have resulted in the terrible destruction of the beautiful landscape of Victoria we have seen over the previous week.
The drought is a reality and the worst thing that has been done in Victoria
is to log next to the catchments. I'm no scientist by do remember simple stuff from high school. There is no point to precipitate an event by messing with the precipitation cycle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precipitation_(meteorology)
Just my
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35de1/35de176c02564355a2b73014bc1179ebd13dfc71" alt="Two Cents :2twocents :2twocents"