JohnDe
La dolce vita
- Joined
- 11 March 2020
- Posts
- 4,471
- Reactions
- 6,533
Tesla
In 2020, Tesla’s gross revenue was $31.5 billion and its net revenue was $721 million. Its 2020 gross margin was 21%.
General Motors
$122 billion and its net revenues earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) were $9.7 billion. Its gross margin was 11.2%.
Ford
2020 net revenues EBIT were $2.8 billion and its 2020 gross margin were 11.3%
And that’s not all. Not only do Ford and GM have more debt than Tesla, but Tesla’s market cap is much larger than both of theirs combined.
When you compare the data for a company that is new and growing at incredible speeds to data from two other companies in the same field that have at least 100 years on the new company, it shows that Tesla is conserving its funds for growth and operations while the other two are having to spend billions on paying back debts.
Its already happening, in Europe some markets the european EV makers like VW and others have overtaken Tesla in some countries. Take this example from netherlandsI was first a Tesla sceptic, I then cautiously dipped my tow in the TSLA market about 18 months ago and have kept cautiously topping up on the lows.
My views on the company have drastically change, I believe that it is an amazing company, I even purchased a M3LR. However, I am still cautious, as everyone should be.
A meteoric rise can easily turn into a fall, but I do doubt the possibility as TESLA finish building the factories and the realisation of the death of ICE vehicles is realised.
My biggest fear is the big car companies - Toyota, VW, Ford getting together to supercharge production and sale of a quality cheap EV. Yes I know a long shot but it is possible.
Another fear is China, it's well know that they want to be a world EV manufacturer and they are not shy in hobbling competition. Will China continue their 'business as usual' with Tesla, or will they give priority to their own manufacturers?
Gross Margin= whats left after taking in the COGS. It does not include all the admin overheads like marketing, non manufacturing staff, and debt interest costs.Tesla
In 2020, Tesla’s gross revenue was $31.5 billion and its net revenue was $721 million. Its 2020 gross margin was 21%.
I did a bit of head scratching over this one.General Motors
$122 billion and its net revenues earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) were $9.7 billion. Its gross margin was 11.2%.
Ford
2020 net revenues EBIT were $2.8 billion and its 2020 gross margin were 11.3%
And that’s not all. Not only do Ford and GM have more debt than Tesla, but Tesla’s market cap is much larger than both of theirs combined.
When you compare the data for a company that is new and growing at incredible speeds to data from two other companies in the same field that have at least 100 years on the new company, it shows that Tesla is conserving its funds for growth and operations while the other two are having to spend billions on paying back debts.
The best comparison of apples with apples is here.How did they come up with the gross margin of 21% when net revenue is 721mill on a gross revenue of 31.5billion?
well lets see how the boxing match between F150 lightning Vs. Cybertruck Vs Chevy Silverado goes. Bring on the truck wars!!The best comparison of apples with apples is here.
Comparisons are otherwise problematic as Tesla has Boring, Energy and Space X, while GM makes more from its vehicle financing arms.
Bottom line: Tesla is now a cash cow compared to GM:
View attachment 134531
That trend will continue as Tesla has no legacy issues to contend with and only improves its already class leading product, while the GMs and Fords of the world have nothing close in performance or quality.
The other issue that will see Tesla streak ahead is its planning for battery needs to match its proposed production.
Its already happening, in Europe some markets the european EV makers like VW and others have overtaken Tesla in some countries. Take this example from netherlands
Top 10 year-to-dateoctober data)
IN USA we have Rivian and Ford with the new EV trucks getting all the news and fanfare. I think the Ford F150 lightning truck has already surpassed 160k reservation. Ford share price has since 4x this year from that.
- Kia Niro EV (e-Niro) - 3,734
- Skoda Enyaq iV - 3,619
- Volvo XC40 PHEV - 2,540
- Ford Mustang Mach-E - 2,261
- Volkswagen ID.4 - 1,993
- Ford Kuga PHEV - 1,975
- Tesla Model 3 - 1,482
- BMW iX3 - 1,386
- Lynk & Co 01 PHEV - 1,241
- Volvo XC40 Recharge - 1,203
In China, there are many new EV startups(Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto are all challenging Tesla) and now battery makers too. Only reason they let Tesla in was to copy the tech, now they have done so, they have a plethora of local EVs gaining sales fast and in some segments may outsell TEsla soon.
Tesla will likely prosper and grow together with the EV market but likely will experience some degree of margin compression. Unlike Apple which doesnt make their own phones, Tesla has to make their own cars, and there is no software platform to leverage off where you can sell software or subscriptions like on itunes/appstore. Teslas AI self driving tech is not really making much progress and still on the same level 2 grade as other car makers last time i looked.
And now with fed tapering the easy money and elon selling hard, i am not sure the market cap valuation can continue to be trillion dollars.
Gross Margin= whats left after taking in the COGS. It does not include all the admin overheads like marketing, non manufacturing staff, and debt interest costs.
I did a bit of head scratching over this one.
How did they come up with the gross margin of 21% when net revenue is 721mill on a gross revenue of 31.5billion?
I went looking for more information and found the last ten years financials for all three companies.
If you look at the financial statements for each of them TESLA , General Motors , and Ford
I could not correlate the figures the analyst quoted for any of them.
There are two ways to fund a company, issue shares or negotiate debt, or do a combo of both.
Perhaps if one did a comparison of the EPS between tesla and the other two, one get an entirely different picture.
This is the first year that tesla has had a positive EPS at 64 CPS.
All previous years were negative returns.
Ford made a loss this year , its EPS was a negative 32CPS.
But every year prior to this it had a positive EPS.
GM this year had one if its better years with a positive eps of $4.33.Its last negative EPS was in 2016, all the others were positve.
You can draw numerous pictures from the above, as I currently don't plan to invest in any of them, I will draw none.
Mick
On Sunday, we received the Q4 2021 production and delivery report from electric vehicle maker Tesla (TSLA). The company was expected to finish the year strong, primarily thanks to the Shanghai factory ramp. Tesla did just that, coming in with its best quarter ever, while also proving that wall street analyst estimates may not be worth watching anymore.
Deutsche Bank said the company is better equipped to face semiconductor bottlenecks than its peers. It raised its Q4 revenue forecast to $17.2 billion from $16.1 billion and its EPS expectation to $2.70 from $2.46.
I keep some entries with projections/guess's;
Gali Russell on 19/12/2020 gave unit production for 4th qtr at 300k and total for 2021 at 935k ...
credit where credits due..
Been a couple of good long form sit downs with Dave Lee in the last couple of weeks, not least with James Douma.
Tesla has been tracing a well know bearish pattern, the head and shoulders. It has broken the neckline and is at the typical 'throwback' or 'retest'. There are a couple of ways to play this but i like 'looking inside the bars' and determining what the market structure tells me could be the best entries and stop locations.
To do this i use volume profile on an intra-day chart.
Examples of two ways to play this as a swing trade:
You can clearly see on the price action above the gap we have a double distribution pattern. Statistically the lower half of the distribution usually gets a re-test more than 50% of the time, so 215.98 becomes our aggressive entry. The stop is placed above the value area of the higher distribution. If we prefer to wait for more downward price action then a more 'conservative' entry could actually be the gap play, with a stop above the low volume node at 215.29
The target area for this pattern is around the 149.75 area, which is a measured move from the high, to the 'neckline' and also coincides with a prior VWAP. These prior areas of 'value' are almost 'magnetic' targets.
Trade it well....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?