Now those conditions are???
Your right it is raw and really doesnt find divergence.
The problem is you need to get around the Zig Zag indicator often needed to define peaks and troughs.Thats why Im guarded about the code.
I paid for it!
tech/a I kindly request you backtest the conditions as presented for mechanical "type 2" trades in Chapter 11 of the current Advanced GET Trading Manual, link posted earlier.
Why on earth ZigZag? Why not Tom DeMark supply/demand points (which are just "fractals" of various duration) if you want something precise, or ATR swings to account for vol?
The "twin peaks" divergence used in the Bill Williams system (a bit different again, uses inflection in AO to enter) is outlined down the very bottom here:
http://www.alpari.co.uk/en/alpari_academy/market_analysis/bill_chaos/ao.html
AO is pretty much identical to the AdvancedGET oscillator, but the "type 2" trade for GET does not mind if the oscillator crosses below 0 between the "peaks" whereas Bill Williams does. I notice frinks divergences above don't cross over the 50 line of RSI which is equivalent to 0 line of the AO or GET oscillator.
Has all your divergence backtesting been using ZigZag?
Ok ii've updated DUE and SGN - Will update DUE on Monday.
happy to lay my cards on the table here - Tech/A i've done plenty of back testing - lets see from the results as they go as although i'm not stating entry/exit points i'm still showing bullish/bearish on my posts (all bullish so far however will post the bearish when they show up.) I might start at least showing on the chart where i've made the 'call'
still happy to take the criticism but lets just see how it goes
No but if yor using peaks and troughs of price or oscillator----Zig Zag cannot be used in a formula(Thats how metastock atleast identifies peaks and troughs in price or oscillator---with the Zig Zag formula) If you do you will have a false result in systems testing because the % swing is dynamic those identified in hindsite are now set in stone(Peaks and troughs)---those which are current(You find today) are dynamic and todays peak or trough may disappear in 2 or so days to show a very different peak or trough this is why it is SO difficult to trade in R/T This will become aparent when live traded---you have to code around it.
Type 2 trades from GET arent divergence trades.
They are possible end of wave 5 trades with stochastic as one of the filters.
Ive never coded nor tested the setup and would be interesting to do but it has no bearing on the divergence discussion.
"1. When the Wave 5 makes new highs, make sure the Elliott Oscillator shows divergence between the Wave 3 peak and the Wave 5 peak."
Like all oscillators in your case Sinner (AO) they look fantastic when seen in hindisite particularly when shown on a chart with a well behaving trend its just an M/A.
Realtime they are a completely different animal.
Hi Professor,actually I thought it did a half decent job for something that got banged together in 20minutes
Every signal it spat out seemed ok. Maybe I just don't understand divergence properly, it's not really something I've looked at in great detail before.
Here are the last couple. Seems fine to me.
View attachment 38269
Thanks for that code though. Off to the races today so will most likely be under the weather tomorrow, and maybe monday, will try and come back to this later.
Great stuff.
Can you whack up a chart on both please.
I think it important to have an entry point otherwise all that's being shown is a possible setup.
Unless of course your saying that your divergences are a precursor to another entry triggered by some other condition?
I also think its important to know when the signal no longer valid---in other words the divergence is no longer applicable as a setup---IE its failed.
On the flip side when you would take profit.
Any stop?
Not hard to post up and then follow.
The manufacturers opinion:
"The divergence concept is perhaps one of the most powerful reversal techniques discovered by Technical Analysis"
Hi Tech,
That listing is just pure rubbish and demonstrates the typical politician approach
Most of the stocks just would not even be considered due to their lack of liquidity
and I would think that most people who use divergence, would look for them in a TRENDING market, with the view to entering a trade following the warning given by the formation of a price/indicator divergence
NOT IN A RANGE BOUND MARKET!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Most of the stocks in your list meet one of those conditions
This "debate" is meaningless
Bottom line
That listing is rubbish
You qualify as a politician
So I'll just walk away and do something meaningful and not waste my time
Peter
Why do you do this Tech? - you are far above this #%$* !!
Sinner.
I certainly like the idea of the type 2 AGET setup being used.
The rules are very clear and I have GET so can find trades to monitor.
Enrty Exits and Stops are clear.
I presume you have GET as well so can check also how its going.
For those that dont here are the rules as Sinner pointed out and some charts showing a trade.(From Esignal)
I particularly like the 94% claim will keep an eye on that one.
I have no idea why you keep using a stochastic oscillator for your divergence?
Pretty easy really.
Its the one used by AGET in their type 2 trades.
Happy to use whatever you like.
But thought you'd suggested the type 2 trade.
Must be missing something once again?
My selections just dont seem to cut the mustard.---I'll refrain then.
Look forward to watching things unfold in Realtime rather than hindsite.
With respect to the hindsight aspect, any description or informing of a strategy may need a hindsight chart to help with the transfer of information. With respect to a live trade the foresight comes from the knowledge we have gained. Trading knowledge aren't we? (more practical than theoretical)Pretty easy really.
My selections just dont seem to cut the mustard.---I'll refrain then.
Look forward to watching things unfold in Realtime rather than hindsite.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?