Re: Trading CFD's
Thank you.
Bob.
Kauri your above post was an eye opener, most interesting !Kauri said:That is why I stopped trading, studied what I was doing, and started using GSL's.
Say I had $100000 for a bank and wanted to go unprotected via CFD's in BHP, then by risking no more than 15% (or $15000) on a complete wipeout scenario then the amount I purchase would be 15000/26.5=566 shares.
a) Via CFD= 5% margin + (5% margin*10% for divi allowance)=$825 with $14175 put away in case of disaster = $15000. Total risk = $15000....
b) Via normal purchase of shares = $15000. Total risk = $15000....
c) Via CFD DMA GSL = 5% margin + (5% margin*10% for divi allowance) + 0.3% GSL premium = 750 + 75 + 45 =$870. Total risk = $870.
Should also mention that under my trading guidelines (another contentious issue on another thread ) that no one position (total share value) will represent more than 15% of my bank and my total use of funds available (margin etc) will not represent more than 30% of my available funds.
Now why would I use a or b over c, in fact why would I bother with leveraged a as opposed to b, apart from a small interest gain? In a and b I could have approx 7 open BHP type positions with all my $100000 committed and ultimately all at risk whereas with c I can comfortably have 15 BHP type positions open with less than 15% of my funds committed and at risk. If I am going to use leverage I want to know my total liability under a worst case scenario and I want to be in control of my risk, not at the mercy of external factors ( and unexpected earnings downgrades ).
Thank you.
Bob.