- Joined
- 23 November 2004
- Posts
- 3,974
- Reactions
- 851
Poor show by LNP for not initially giving Michelle Rowland a "pair" to attend her sick child.
Poor show by LNP for not initially giving Michelle Rowland a "pair" to attend her sick child.
Michelle Rowland tells us that the opposition are heartless because it has blocked her from returning home to her sick child. Her husband has time off from work to look after the sick child, it should be in good hands.
The child became sick on Mother’s Day, Sunday the 12th May, with a fever and vomiting. She did attend parliament on Tuesday. Why the fuss now, except maybe it is a misandrist ploy to paint Abbott as a misogynist, using a woman and sick child as bait in a feeble attempt to yet again smear.
UPDATE
The ABC’s The World Today makes this the top item of its political coverage. Naturally.
And again, Rowland is still there, giving interviews. Why hasn’t she gone home to her sick child?
I'd argue management in most industries - especially IT and white collar - are the main impediments to productivity improvements.
Poor show by LNP for not initially giving Michelle Rowland a "pair" to attend her sick child.
Hmm, most of the IT workers I know are working long hours with no extra pay, no overtime etc. and are under the constant threat of having their jobs offshored or outsourced. Hard to see how one can be any more "productive" in such an environment.
Clearly then many jobs so go to the lowest cost country or providers, but what jobs would be left in Australia - the poorly paid service sector. If you want that kind of society then the U.S. is your model where the middle class has been destroyed with huge wealth disparity as a consequence.
You'd think so if you just listened to the initial item on the ABC. But in fact, the child became sick last Sunday, was taken to the doctor, appropriately diagnosed, and given antibiotics. She then improved and had stopped vomiting and was eating again. Ms Rowland disclosed that she was 'very lucky to have such a supportive family who were caring for the child when she was not able to be there.'Poor show by LNP for not initially giving Michelle Rowland a "pair" to attend her sick child.
I agree. I did like his approach of addressing his remarks to the electorate which was in stark contrast to the government's "we have done this" etc., particularly the Treasurer's defensive remarks when delivering the Budget.I thought Abbott did a good job tonight. He started off a bit flat but he warmed to the job. The sour faces on the opposite bench showed that he was hitting the target. As Joe Hockey remarked the other day the best cuts are the ones Gillard and Swan have made for you.
Newman's landslide inevitably contained a large number of completely inexperienced people, so it was probably inevitable that a few would turn out to be duds.I was always confident Abbott would make a good PM but the last few days I have been wondering about the make up of his government.
If he wins by a landslide I hope he doesn't have too much dead wood .Are there any Craig Thompsons or Slippers about to get elected .Newman obviously had a few duds to contend with.
Totally agree , just like Japan has now with a new government in control , after putting up with years of leadership with similar attributes to our Labor mob.Watch our economy and confidence jump out of the box after September 14th.
Watch our economy and confidence jump out of the box after September 14th.
Depends. Seems like the housing ponnzi scheme is just starting to rev up, so you might be right, but I'm still inclined to think that whoever's in power next year is going to have to face the first technical recession in a couple of decades.
It is heartening to see so many positive posts on this thread about Tony Abbott.
Tony Abbott has long been on my radar as possibly one of the best prime ministers we will ever have.
gg
There are four months to go, for goodness sake!What I don't get is why Tony is being such a wuss. What's better, to be the small target and have a pathetically timid first term ala O'Farrell in NSW with a huge majority, or go to this election with a decent reform agenda, though with a smaller though still decent majority?
I'll admit I'm not fond of Tony, but they way he's running his microscopically small target campaign turns me off him even more. Where's a politician these days with the cajones to stand up, tell us what they will do if elected, and give us a choice. Where's the politician that doesn't run things through a focus group 5 times before it's presented to the public?
By Tony's argument that he will do his tax review and present ny changes for the 2016 election, so as to have a mandate, provides the ALP and independents plenty of ammunition to say he has no mandate for his first term to really do anything.
Maybe I expect to much, but I'd just love an opposition of any ilk to provide a reasonable level of detail on their policies, at least to the level they seem to demand of the opposition when they're in power.
Many conservatives on this thread have had their doubts about Tony Abbott's leadership abilities, including myself. Your support has never wavered, and at last I am reaching the conclusion that your confidence is fully justified. I thought his budget reply was very good and showed political nous and maturity.
All Labor has left is the implementation of a strategy to try to expose whether he has clay feet. McTernan will be delving deeply into his **** bucket now to provide some dirt for the usual suspects to throw.
There are four months to go, for goodness sake!
And clearly, sydboy, you so dislike Mr Abbott that whatever he did you'd find it worthy of criticism.![]()
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.