Some times I wonder why I read the crap on this forum.
The following link is about Tony Abbott's Chief of Staff.
http://www.thepowerindex.com.au/thepower50/peta-credlin
I am wondering when it became law that a politician has to appoint
people, who the voters think should have the job.
And while I am at it, what sex?
joea
Another lie by the labor stooges regarding Abbott being sexist.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/misogyny-is-not-on-tony-abbotts-agenda/story-e6frezz0-1226456088631
Yeh I know what you mean
I often wonder why I add to it--"the crap"!
It hasn't been a good 24 hours for TA.
LEIGH SALES: I'm going on the facts that Marius Kloppers said today when he was directly asked if the decision on Olympic Dam was affected by Australia's tax situation and I'm going on the facts that are outlined in their results statement that they've issued. Have you actually read BHP's statements?
TONY ABBOTT: No, but I've also got again the statement of Jacques Nasser, who says, "While we're still evaluating the impact of the carbon tax, but it just makes it more difficult."
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2012/s3573785.htm
REPORTER: Why did you say on ABC last night that you said you hadn't ?
TONY ABBOTT: I was responding to something Leigh said about Marius Kloppers.
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2012/s3573785.htm]
I can't believe Labor are still trying to run with this "Abott is sexist" line, there is nothing about him that points to that IMO. I actually really admire him. No, he is not without fault, but as politicians go he seems to be quite decent.
For the ABC, I suspect that they feel this is the last roll of the dice in order to save Labor, hence TA was put under the pump and was found wanting.Miss Hale - I actually wonder of labor women have problems with powerful men such as Abbott...lol
Leigh Sales seemed in a very venomous mood last night trying to attack Abbott - maybe she is as sexist as Gillard, Roxon and Plibersek when it comes to men in power...
He absolutely clearly replied "No", when asked by Sales if he had read Koppers' remarks.It hasn't been a good 24 hours for TA.
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2012/s3573785.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2012/s3573785.htm
She is only doing her job. Had she asked similar questions of Labor members, wouldn't you have been applauding her? I have never seen once any indication that Sales is at all sexist.Miss Hale - I actually wonder of labor women have problems with powerful men such as Abbott...lol
Leigh Sales seemed in a very venomous mood last night trying to attack Abbott - maybe she is as sexist as Gillard, Roxon and Plibersek when it comes to men in power...
Perhaps, or perhaps rather that he had directly contradicted Marius Koppers' clearly stated reasons for the postponement of the project in saying it was in part due to the Carbon and Mining taxes, and he was therefore invited on to 7.30 to clarify such a remark.For the ABC, I suspect that they feel this is the last roll of the dice in order to save Labor, hence TA was put under the pump and was found wanting.
Completely agree. More efforts like last night's will quickly have him earning even more dissatisfaction points.Him and his media advisors need to work out a way to deal with this more effectively so he doesn't come across like a fool.
Mining tax in its present form no, but carbon tax yes.Perhaps, or perhaps rather that he had directly contradicted Marius Koppers' clearly stated reasons for the postponement of the project in saying it was in part due to the Carbon and Mining taxes, and he was therefore invited on to 7.30 to clarify such a remark.
Totally justified imo.
...She is only doing her job. Had she asked similar questions of Labor members, wouldn't you have been applauding her? I have never seen once any indication that Sales is at all sexist.
To suggest that any criticism of Tony Abbott is of a sexist foundation is as unfounded imo as all the allegations that the criticism of Julia Gillard is because she's a woman. Nonsense in both cases....
Mining tax in its present form no, but carbon tax yes.
These are long term projects and with the carbon tax intended to rise, it would have an increasing impact on the operating cost of the mine. From his perspective, there's no need for Marius Koppers to publically criticise the government. He can invest elsewhere if he chooses.
I don't disagree with Leigh Sales's questioning, but the ABC itself has been mis-representing the impact of the carbon tax.
https://www.aussiestockforums.com/f...t=23929&page=2&p=723972&viewfull=1#post723972
I hope the ABC is equally as hard on Julia Gillard when she is interviewed in future.
If anyone can give a single strong, persuasive or at least relevant answer or comment that he gave in that interview, I'd genuinely be surprised.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-23/abbott-now-says-he-did-read-bhp-statement/4217680
Not that interview, but it does offer some insight as to where TA is coming from.
Under tough questioning from presenter Leigh Sales about his insistence the carbon tax was a factor in the Olympic Dam decision, he said he hadn't read that day's BHP's statements.
Yesterday, he insisted he had in fact read its announcement, claiming he'd been referring to another issue when he had said ''no''. His explanation wasn't particularly convincing - he'd had an opportunity to correct himself on the program - but it was equally hard to believe that he didn't scan the press release.
Perhaps the surprising thing about Abbott is that he hasn't made more slips. He attempts to be so disciplined he sometimes looks like he's been coated with political formaldehyde. The preoccupation with discipline extends to the Abbott office's control over the frontbench. Some shadow ministers rail about the constraints they are under, with the leader's staff vetting and restricting their media engagements.
If trust is the Prime Minister's stand-out problem, Abbott's is credibility. Put simply, the man exaggerates.
Hence his discomfort under Sales' questioning about Olympic Dam, when the comment of BHP Billiton's Marius Kloppers on tax was put to him. Kloppers said the South Australian and federal governments and all the agencies ''that have worked with us to make this a reality have been absolutely wonderful partners to have''. Asked whether the issue of tax had come into the judgment to hold back, he said the decision was almost wholly associated with capital costs - the tax environment for this project hadn't changed (the mining tax doesn't cover the minerals at Olympic).
He reference was to governments policies more broadly and not soley on the carbon tax. He would have been much better off pursuing this rationale from the outset.Investor sentiment is an interesting point, but unfortunately nothing to do with Olympic Dam... Olympic Dam profitability is completely independent of carbon tax.
(apparently)..
He just keeps insisting that the carbon tax had made 'good projects marginal'.
Investor sentiment is an interesting point, but unfortunately nothing to do with Olympic Dam... Olympic Dam profitability is completely independent of carbon tax (apparently).He just keeps insisting that the carbon tax had made 'good projects marginal'.
BHP Billiton head Marius Kloppers has told European investors that Australia's carbon and mining taxes have helped to render the nation's coal industry unworthy of further investment at this time.
Despite reassuring Australians that the taxes were not to blame for BHP's mothballing of the $US30 billion Olympic Dam expansion, Mr Kloppers referred to both when telling British media that new investments in Australia's coal sector would not be profitable.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?