- Joined
- 2 May 2007
- Posts
- 4,698
- Reactions
- 2,908
Re: TON - Triton Gold
Good analysis Kennas as always.
I do not hold TON any more.
Notwithstanding I always wonder how could the companies produce such results in the market and there is no queries from so called captive geologists withing the company board or the major shareholders challenging the depth (or lack of) of result
Cheers
You really should drill into the results a little more to get a true understanding of what they have proven here.
Just down the page they go on:
3.9 t/n over 0.5m from 155m depth, is quite frankly, pitiful.
Again, poor really.
And why not mention the width of these great results like in the previous paragraph?
Well, if you look at the results table below. These are the lab results for hole SGR006.
See, 5.4 g/t over ? What? There's no 5.4g/t at all. LOL
What they are actually saying is 5.4 g/t is a 'field duplicate',and it's over a massive 1m.
I mean, really.
They're going to have to come up with some much much wider and higher grade results than that to ever get any where near finding an economic deposit.
Good analysis Kennas as always.
I do not hold TON any more.
Notwithstanding I always wonder how could the companies produce such results in the market and there is no queries from so called captive geologists withing the company board or the major shareholders challenging the depth (or lack of) of result
Cheers