- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,650
- Reactions
- 24,555
Well cbh If you read back a few posts you would see that I was told Telstra is not such a large Communications orginisation. In actual fact Singtel(optus), Hutchinson(3), Vodaphone, Virgin are all bigger on a global scale, it is just they want to cherry pick and be parasites on your telecom system. Also the Government legislated to stop Telstra offering deals the same as the competition. Haven't you been noticing the loss of market share to Optus. If they were allowed to offer the same or better they would be creaming Optus. There is only one saving grace with the N.B.N. one would think Telstra will then not have to service all the country areas(how many Optus trucks have you seen in the bush) and will also be able to offer the same deals as the opposition. The difference will be Telstra have full national coverage the parasites don,t and won't untill the roll out of the N.B.N at taxpayers expense. Yeah lets support the freeloader!!!Hi sptrawler, thanks for your meaningful response.
Here in lies the problem, I would have no beef with telstra and the NBN would not have existed or even have been required if telstra in the first place did things with quality and costed their items at reasonable prices. When you say with the apartment block that other ISPs can install their own equipment that is possibly true(i'm not sure if it is full or just not profit worthy). But what ideally would happen is that since telstra is such a large communications organisation they could have priced competitively but they've chosen not to do this to maintain maximum profits. They're paying for this now via the NBN.
Hopefully an agreement gets sorted out for all parties involved, telstra, the government and the people of Australia.
Actually malachi what i am inferring is the Government is playing with fire. They will have to either give Telstra a fair and equitable price for its infrastructure or the shareholders won't accept it. Then the Government has a real problem, build its own infrastructure which it can't afford to do or scrap the NBN which it should do but is politically another back flip. If it decides to build it,who is going to jump onto a fibre fixed line when it will cost more and when people are leaving fixed line connections in droves. If the take up is low how will it be funded? Maybe the Government will treat it like sewage and water and force owners to pay for it when it goes past the house, political suicide. So malachi it is just a punt on who will blink first. One thing for sure is Telstra owns it and is making money from it, the Liberals if they get in will reduce spending and Telstra should be off the radar. If Labor keep going the way they are, another potential $43billion stuff up will see them out in the wilderness for another 20years.
It is a dead set loser for Rudd and I think that makes Tls a potentially good buy at around $3. But as with all shares it is just a punt on outcomes. I have taken the plunge on Tls again hope I don't get burnt again.
The federal government has done a deal with Telstra giving NBNCo access to infrastructure. http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/20/2931852.htm has 9 billion for pit/duct access. Is that good or bad for Telstra? It is money but signs away a part of their earnings.
The federal government has done a deal with Telstra giving NBNCo access to infrastructure. http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/20/2931852.htm has 9 billion for pit/duct access. Is that good or bad for Telstra? It is money but signs away a part of their earnings.
So it has to be asked whats the story if the libs win the election?? they have already said they will stop the NBN. Then what of this. I would say it would be long Rudd then you would be long TLS as well. Long Libs short tls??
So it has to be asked whats the story if the libs win the election?? they have already said they will stop the NBN. Then what of this. I would say it would be long Rudd then you would be long TLS as well. Long Libs short tls??
It'd be quite a conflict in interest for those who hold shares in the big cap miners and telstra haha.
Well Boggo it might have been your lucky day when you were stopped out by 1 cent, time will tell, my guess is they will fly on Monday.
And how many years will that take to realise?
In the interim, by buying the infrastructure arm from Telstra (Valued between 10 and 20 billion dollars by analysts) The govt will allow the successful NBN bidder access to all of the copper infrastructure comprising of the copper itself, ducts, conduits and pipes.
This will allow the bidder to use the ducts and conduits etc to run the fibre which is the end goal.
However in the shorter term they can also offer a copper based solution which will allow them to fulfill the govt mandate of delivering data to every household with the added benefit of generating revenue which they could use to fund the roll out the fibre on an interim basis.
If Telstra get $8-10 billion for the infrastructure plus costs for restructuring their It systems etc (estimated at approximately 2.5 billion) then it could be good for everyone all round.
No winners if a separate infrastructure is used so whatever happens it must use the existing trenches etc or the project will never get off the ground. Aerial is not an option and the economics say a separate trench to what is there is not viable.
Great to have some constructive comments on where readers feel this will end up.
Great post.
One way to ensure Telstra stays interested (which is a must for this to get some traction) is when (if) the infrastructure is hived out for the NBN, Telstra take a mix of cash and Equity. That way Telstra will have some strong reasons to migrate their base over to the NBN. Cash short term and increasing revenues long term is a popular theme with share holders.
So do you think TLS would be a good buy at this stage? (ie, in your opinion, would it head North? or South?)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?