Apart from trimming the fat, it's what I reckon they try to *let happen.Personally, I'd just trim the fat off the public service, let inflation run hot (shoot for 4%) and let bracket creep take care of it, but I have approximately 1/27 millionth of a say in what will be done, so it's not exactly up to me.
I think the point is that governments have basically handed out lots of money to be spent on consumer goods and so on whereas a greater economic return could have been achieved by putting that into additional infrastructure instead.Actually lots of stuff is being built, snowy scheme, highways etc but Sometimes **** happens, and you have to press pause on infrastructure etc and go into debt to fight a war, this time it’s a war against a virus. We will survive, things will return to normal, and we won’t be devastated by bomb blasts.
The problem with trimming the fat in the PS is they usually trim the meat and keep the fat.Personally, I'd just trim the fat off the public service,
In other years the government has handed out lots of money to be spent on bombs, bullets and aircraft etc to fight wars.I think the point is that governments have basically handed out lots of money to be spent on consumer goods and so on whereas a greater economic return could have been achieved by putting that into additional infrastructure instead.
There's a limit to how much infrastructure is useful but we're not there yet, it's a better way to pump prime the local economy than importing big screen TV's and cars.
That’s part of fighting the negative effect of the virus, that has a genuine economic purpose, just as going into debt to fight WW2 also had an economic purpose.But in these days the debt is not due to building infrastructure, it's because of handouts to businesses and individuals to simply keep on living or keeping restaurant doors open.
Nothing extra is being built that wasn't planned already because governments simply can't afford it.
This debt has to be paid off, and income from infrastructure won't do it.
Spend the money on infrastructure and it creates economic activity now and into the future.whether we are defending our quality of life through bombs, or by fighting a virus I don’t think there is much difference.
That’s part of fighting the negative effect of the virus, that has a genuine economic purpose, just as going into debt to fight WW2 also had an economic purpose.
during World War Two we were basically spending millions of dollars on ships, planes and tanks just to blow them up miles from home, destroying resources and our labour force, it’s no less wasteful than the activities mentioned to protect our economy and keep the population going during this pandemic.
Agreed entirely.The problem with trimming the fat in the PS is they usually trim the meat and keep the fat.
A few large corporates have gone down the same track over the years and they, and their share price, tends to stagnate (at best) over the long term as a result. Short term bounce as costs are cut then long term pain as the reality of losing the best people sets in.
Avoid companies run by "fixer" type CEO's with a track record of coming in, slashing costs then moving on before the inevitable hits the fan. Pump and dump is the game basically....
As distinct from real, actual cost cutting which takes out the dead wood and keeps the rest. All too often that's not how it's done though.
The problem is knowing that i have no doubt in my mind debt would be bigger had Labour been in power.with more businesses down.I have no argument with that, the point is how do we finance this extra spending ?
Leave the debt for other generations , cut spending on services, raise taxes on companies or individuals , or make more from our resources which can only be dug up once ?
We have an irresponsible government that has no plans for paying back the debt, while I don't disagree with how they spent money.
The resources sector is a viable source of more funds in an emergency, we would be stupid not to get more from it while we can.
When you look at how critical the LNP were about the relatively modest debt of Labor by comparison, but now the debt is theirs, there is no problem.
Ha ha ha.
The debt will be paid, but during the middle of the war is not the time to worry about the debt.I have no argument with that, the point is how do we finance this extra spending ?
Leave the debt for other generations , cut spending on services, raise taxes on companies or individuals , or make more from our resources which can only be dug up once ?
We have an irresponsible government that has no plans for paying back the debt, while I don't disagree with how they spent money.
The resources sector is a viable source of more funds in an emergency, we would be stupid not to get more from it while we can.
When you look at how critical the LNP were about the relatively modest debt of Labor by comparison, but now the debt is theirs, there is no problem.
Ha ha ha.
If there is a residential building boom, that shows that handing money out is creating stuff for tomorrow.Spend the money on infrastructure and it creates economic activity now and into the future.
Spend the same money by handing it to consumers and it creates economic activity now but nothing tomorrow.
The approach we have taken, seems to have resulted in an extreme two halves situation. Things like residential building are booming to the point of material shortages meanwhile things like live entertainment are almost dead. The real economy's very split there.residential
But governments are in the business of re-election the time infrastructure is finished they're long goneSpend the money on infrastructure and it creates economic activity now and into the future.
Spend the same money by handing it to consumers and it creates economic activity now but nothing tomorrow.
The approach we have taken, seems to have resulted in an extreme two halves situation. Things like residential building are booming to the point of material shortages meanwhile things like live entertainment are almost dead. The real economy's very split there.
I don't catch taxis often, but when I do, I like to have a chat with the driver and get his/her views on the state of the economy. It can be quite an interesting chat.
I also like to walk a lot, and perhaps it's due to my 'bear-ish' nature, but I have noticed a lot of shops closing down on the streets I walk on. Some of these have been in existence for quite a while (like 5+ years) and some seem short lived.
More recently, I have noticed some friends within my circle to be losing their job or struggling with their career stability. It almost feels like the grim reaper of redundancy is circling me like a shark.
So from my own personal, and microscopic experience, the state of the economy appears to be somewhat gloomy, or at the very least, cautious.
I'm interested in the views of others on their own personal/street level/coal face level on how they feel the economy is going or will be going. Please feel free to share
when i was there ( WA ) in 2012 , WA was obviously the growth potential of Australia , quirky but full of potentialLocal shopping centre (Midland WA) seemed to be thriving when we first arrived back here 3 months ago, only want or two shops in the centre boarded up.
I didn't countdown but there seems to be at least 10 boarded up now. And apart from McStalin having the occasional rush of blood, WA hasn't really had the same level of lockdown as the Eastern states.
But there does seem to be cracks appearing in the economy here.
another difference is during WW1 and WW2 we killed thousands of young man in their prime , this time they would rather kill grannies ( pensioners )That’s part of fighting the negative effect of the virus, that has a genuine economic purpose, just as going into debt to fight WW2 also had an economic purpose.
during World War Two we were basically spending millions of dollars on ships, planes and tanks just to blow them up miles from home, destroying resources and our labour force, it’s no less wasteful than the activities mentioned to protect our economy and keep the population going during this pandemic.
MMT ( Modern Monetary Theory ) MIGHT work if the money is invested WISELY in durable infrastructure , but sadly human nature ruins than chanceIf there is a residential building boom, that shows that handing money out is creating stuff for tomorrow.
At the end of the day, in hindsight how much would the government of 1930 been willing to go into debt if they were able to sail through the 1930’s with no depression? Avoiding the pain of depressions is a very valid reason to increase government debt, as I said no different to fighting a war.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?