- Joined
- 8 June 2008
- Posts
- 13,136
- Reactions
- 19,332
The ones which see 49pc of Australian not paying more taxes than they receive.be it childcare subsidies, being forced to take mandatory private health insurance while having some premium paid back, etc
In a rough idea, 80pc of Australians should pay some taxes,however minimal otherwise we have a nation of entitled who end up with a socialist government and a dead country until starvation.. Chile, Argentina,soon France, Spain
Agreed. Educating people to be financially responsible is one way to improve the breed.Family Tax Benefits ?
I agree there, if people can't afford their kids that should not be the problem of the general taxpayer.
Nope, they just ensure taxes are paid at each individuals correct marginal rate, and here is no double taxation.Would you agree franking credit rebates are welfare ?
An issue there is who gets that money?
That is, the possibility that the money is in practice being transferred from someone who would spend it in the real local economy to someone who won't do so.
LOL > I don't think Australia going into horrendous debt was a personal choice.
Having more debt now than ten years ago is very relevant. You and I have to pay for it.
That money doesn't just go in some one else’s pocket - it goes out of the country, which creates a negative effect here.
Using the "zero net debt" theory isn't a magic bullet because it avoids the point of the debate.
Apart from the last sentence I'd have to disagree. The Australian economy is not strong enough to have a choice of whether we go into debt or not. We rely heavily (I would argue too heavily) on the world economy to keep us going. When a GFC happens and our revenues are lower the Govt just doesn't have the choice to stop programs to balance the budget unless we're happy to play Hoover and endure triple dip recessions and the like - which would then cut revenues even further.none of that is an argument against my position.
I never said debt doesn’t have bad side effects for those who owe money.
offcourse Australia going into debt was a choice, the government spent more than they collected in taxes, they could have spent less or taxed more to avoid debt if they wanted.
but as I said not all debt is bad, the current debt might have been total worth it, who knows.
Family Tax Benefits ?
I agree there, if people can't afford their kids that should not be the problem of the general taxpayer.
it’s going to get spent or relent no matter what, offcourse it might not get spent or re-lent in the exact down it was earned in, but that’s just they way the cookie crumbles.
With life span increasing and wealth accumulating towards the top, an increasing portion of total wealth could stored as 1s and 0s in growing bank accounts rather than circulating through the economy?
Apart from the last sentence I'd have to disagree. The Australian economy is not strong enough to have a choice of whether we go into debt or not. We rely heavily (I would argue too heavily) on the world economy to keep us going. When a GFC happens and our revenues are lower the Govt just doesn't have the choice to stop programs to balance the budget unless we're happy to play Hoover and endure triple dip recessions and the like - which would then cut revenues even further.
I remember Kevin Rudd promised us a "temporary" deficit to deal with the GFC. LOL
Spoke with a mates young tradie son the other day. I was quite surprised at how naive he was about financial investment matters. Told him to look up on the 'net about compound interest. Also pay yourself first. Ask me some questions after that.
I will be back there in a few days. Interested to know if he looked it up.
Still don't agree.Of course the government has a choice, there is always a choice.
Dividing the tax cake can be done in a manner which does not destroy the economy, but somehow reducing taxes is seen as economically responsible even when debt isn't being decreased.Still don't agree.
When the options are - go into debt - or blow up the economy - there is no choice.
You will have Macca then a heart failure treatment paid by MedicareWell that's a choice - Macca's vs Medicare. Can't have both
you can’t really have it both ways, you either believe debt is growing which is a clear sign money is being re-lent at higher and higher rates and therefore “circulating”, or it is being locked away in a vault in which case debt would not be growing.
so which is it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?