PZ99
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Joined
- 13 May 2015
- Posts
- 3,323
- Reactions
- 2,433
More likely out of the party. Don't forget Rupert Murdoch is our unelected head of state.Or that Morrison is dead scared of the Right in his party.
I think you put way to much importance on Australia.More likely out of the party. Don't forget Rupert Murdoch is our unelected head of state.
Someone's gotta do it. Especially if Australia is going to be held to ransom by some corrupt clown from within the corporatocracy and outside of the country...I think you put way to much importance on Australia.
Yoga for beginners ?
I actually think Murdoch probably gives as much thought to Australia, as we do to outer Botswana, we may have some junior miners and explorers there but do we really care?Someone's gotta do it. Especially if Australia is going to be held to ransom by some corrupt clown from within the corporatocracy and outside of the country...
Yoga for beginners ?
I haven't looked into it, but I would think Murdoch's earnings from Australia are a minor portion of their income.I think your first sentence sums it up. Murdoch doesn't think about Australia at all.
All he thinks about is maximising the amount of money taken out of our country by using his political party disguised as media outlets to undermine our democracy and government.
Not the sort of thing I want my taxes supporting.
Just looking at the headlines, in the various daily papers online, I would say there are far worse trolling going on than the Murdoch press.If Murdoch's takings from here are a minor % of their revenue then that makes it worse because it makes his trolling of our political system disproportionately pointless.
Personally I don't care how much money someone has. But if they use their wealth to corrupt our governments and policies and laws then I think they need to called to account.
Obviously it depends upon your own point of view and beliefs. I would say there is far worse trolling going from the Murdoch press than anywhere else, and that's over a long period of time.Just looking at the headlines, in the various daily papers online, I would say there are far worse trolling going on than the Murdoch press.
But it probably depends, if you agree with the trolling or not.
Just looking at the headlines, in the various daily papers online, I would say there are far worse trolling going on than the Murdoch press.
I haven't looked into it, but I would think Murdoch's earnings from Australia are a minor portion of their income.
Like I said, I think we have a very high opinion of our relative worth in the World.
Just my opinion.
Just check the SMH or AGe any day of the week, but in reality it really doesn't bother me, they all probably balance each other out.Obviously it depends upon your own point of view and beliefs. I would say there are far worse trolling going from the Murdoch press than anywhere else, and that's over a long period of time.
I remember a Murdoch owned newspaper influenced an election by posting birthday suit pics of Pauline Hanson which turned out to be fakes afterwards. Campaigns against Turnbull, Rudd etc
It's all there on the record
Sorry I wasn't meaning it in a monetary context.
I never read it.I read the Australian most days and am continually surprised by many of the opinion peaces extremely poor quality and the gymnastics that go on to put the Coalition in a good light and how the commies are going to over run us.
There really isn't any other media group or publication that follows this business model in Australia.
A good example of how crazy the Murdoch empire suppresses its journalists is David Speers latest writing after leaving.
That's all fair enough but when you have a Murdoch backed group undermining our PM and ultimately getting him replaced halfway through a term I think that's a problem because the voters don't get their say. That's why Murdoch came to Australia for a few weeks before it all happened and left afterwards. And this info is coming from within the empire itself - not something the ABC cooked up.Just check the SMH or AGe any day of the week, but in reality it really doesn't bother me, they all probably balance each other out.
The reality is, the voters have their say and as was shown last election, it isn't always what everyone expects.
I think your observation, that the working class are the swinging voters is absolutely correct and i think they get their information from all sources.
Newspapers and the T.V current affairs programmes don't have the effect they once had, now with social media the young don't read newspapers and don't watch current affairs, from my observations. I know my middle aged children don't, the guys down at the local pub don't and we don't.
So really the only people actively engaged, are those that watch T.V or reading the papers for positive confirmation of their beliefs, sort of preaching to the converted.
Thanks God we have their ABC for unbiaised newsObviously it depends upon your own point of view and beliefs. I would say there is far worse trolling going from the Murdoch press than anywhere else, and that's over a long period of time.
I remember a Murdoch owned newspaper influenced an election by posting birthday suit pics of Pauline Hanson which turned out to be fakes afterwards. Campaigns against Turnbull, Rudd etc
It's all there on the record
Well you had that with Abbott and now they are starting on Morrison, the only one that they didn't hammer was Turnbull.That's all fair enough but when you have a Murdoch backed group undermining our PM and ultimately getting him replaced halfway through a term I think that's a problem because the voters don't get their say. That's why Murdoch came to Australia for a few weeks before it all happened and left afterwards. And this info is coming from within the empire itself - not something the ABC cooked up.
I think we are looking at a royal commission into that group in the not too distant future.
It's utterly corrupt and needs to get blown up.
I never read it.
But with regard your comments, just read the SMH to get a counter opinion on the above, so it should balance.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?