Well I don't think they will be able to throw their hat in the ring again, maybe Bowen because he was very good in the immigration portfolio, once he was indoctrinated into the Shorten coven he went down with the ringmaster. ?Shorten and Bowen are still there mate... pulling the strings.
Last time that happened they took down 2 Prime Ministers
I think you're right.... then again after 80's Howard I reckon anything is possible...Well I don't think they will be able to throw their hat in the ring again, maybe Bowen because he was very good in the immigration portfolio, once he was indoctrinated into the Shorten coven he went down with the ringmaster. ?
Being tough on dole bludgers resonates with Morrisons base.Something morally bankrupt about a government that runs illegal Robodebt against the poor then allows this
Luxury car maker won't repay JobKeeper millions despite 'strong' 2020
Mercedes-Benz pockets almost $5 million in emergency JobKeeper payments, despite boasting of a "strong” financial performance during the COVID-19 economic shock.www.abc.net.au
It also beggars belief, that the same industry wants taxpayer subsidies, to incentivies the purchase of their product.Something morally bankrupt about a government that runs illegal Robodebt against the poor then allows this
Luxury car maker won't repay JobKeeper millions despite 'strong' 2020
Mercedes-Benz pockets almost $5 million in emergency JobKeeper payments, despite boasting of a "strong” financial performance during the COVID-19 economic shock.www.abc.net.au
Imagine how victims of robodebt would feel about thisIt also beggars belief, that the same industry wants taxpayer subsidies, to incentivies the purchase of their product.
I am one, I'm out $6k, my disabled daughter was overpaid 2012 - 2015, didn't find out about it until robocop sent letter in 2017.Imagine how victims of robodebt would feel about this
Any company that holds onto Jobkeeper loses their right to complain about wages and penalty rates
The latest South Park episodeView attachment 123830
Again, PZ is South Park a political satire show, or something?Speaking of South Park...
View attachment 123836
China follows 'Cold War' claim by cutting off key avenue for economic diplomacy with Australia
"ideological discrimination" > https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05...framework-activities-with-australia/100121002
I don't watch either, but once when going through customs, i was asked by immigration what I did, when I said I work in the control room of a power station, he said "Ah Homer Simpson.Ironically, the animated sitcom known as South Park is much like the above if you compare it with the Simpsons. It's more popcorn than cornflakes
Spot on Belli, the more people allow them to encroach, the more they will encroach, it is human nature.I don't think there is any way one could have said or done anything that China perceives as against their interests without China retaliating one way or another.
Although speaking openly may not have been the most diplomatic course, it also showed other countries what we think and lets them know that they are not on their own should they want to be more assertive in their response to China. If China thinks it can get away with anything it wants and there will only be muffled resistance, then it wins and they will keep pursuing their aggressive action to others.
Why do we have to be the ones always to show restraint. You often hear it said that China hates to lose face so we should be diplomatic in our condemnation or criticism. Well f*** them. If they don't want condemnation or criticism, then stop with their aggressive actions.
It is good to see some Phillipines minister come out and tell them to f*** off out of their waters a few days ago.
You can read what Xi said here.From your post PZ, I guess Australia should not have asked for an investigation into the source of covid.
It certainly upset China, obviously they werent interested in finding the origins, or knew it would be a waste of money, like the World hasnt wasted enough trying not to catch it.
Nothing to see here.lol
One thing for sure, no one will dare ask for an investigation into the origins of the next pandemic.
Well if Scomo asked that any investigation, was anything other than independent, he woyld be given heaps. Oh I forgot he is fair game. LolYou can read what Xi said here.
China was only against an independent investigation, for the simple reason that outside the representative WHO, the composition of such a group had no legitimate basis. This is one of the many cases of throwing a lot of mud, and it sticking on the great unwashed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?