Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

The Science Thread

Trial of river oxygenation at Menindee to avert fish kills in Darling River.

 

Researchers discover fastest-growing black hole that consumes mass of 'the Sun and all the planets' combined — every day​


It's got nuthin' on the ATO ;)
 
From Futirism
For nearly 20 years, scientists have debated the viability of an EmDrive, a hypothetical type of engine that could propel a spacecraft without the need for any fuel.

If that sounds too good to be true, that's because it probably is — a working EmDrive would literally break one of the foundational laws of physics — but that hasn't stopped scientists from top research organizations including NASA and DARPA from pursuing the tech, because the payoff would be so extraordinary.

Now, a team of German physicists is conducting a new EmDrive experiment — and this one could end the debate surrounding the controversial concept once and for all.

THRUST BUST​

In 2001, British scientist Roger Shawyer proposed the idea of generating thrust by pumping microwaves into a conical chamber. They'd then bounce off the cone's walls, exerting enough force to power spacecraft."

The problem is that this would essentially be creating force out of nothing, which isn't possible according to the law of conservation of momentum.

Still, a handful of researchers claim they've managed to generate some thrust in their EmDrive experiments — though the amount is so low that it's thus far been hard to say whether the device was in fact generating the thrust or whether it was caused by some outside influence, such as the Earth's magnetism or seismic vibrations.

SENSITIVITY TRAINING​

To clear up the controversy, the team from Technische Universität Dresden has built a super-sensitive instrument for measuring thrust that they believe to be immune to the outside interference plaguing other studies.

They plan to publish the latest results of their EmDrive experiments in the journal Acta Astronautica in August, according to a new Wired profile of their work, and lead research Martin Tajmar told the publication he thinks we might be just a few months away from finally putting the EmDrive debate to bed.
Mick
 
How is your maths ?

Every student in a SAT test in the US (the equivalent of our HSC) got this question wrong.


I get it, but I don't get it. I get that the centrepoint of the outside is the length of the radius, adding the extra revolution.

Yet, like everyone it seems, I thought surely the circumferences of the two circles (or multiples thereof) should match?

A brainbender for sure... I'm going to win money on this down at the pub :laugh:
 
Sustainable use of outer space?
Are we using up all the outer space?
If we don't get net zero outer space use, how many years have we got before the tipping point?
So many questions!.
Mick:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
1709022858675.png
 
The computer did exactly as it was told.
Good computer. pat pat.
mick

The computer was quite a piece of work. I saw another video that described it in more detail, I'll try and dig it up. If it detected an error it had the ability to reboot itself and carry on from where it left off, reloading the program and data. All on 32k of wire wound program and memory. Amazing.
 
Tea Drinker Alert !
Stop boiling the bejesus outta the water , from now on.
Tune in to Dr . Karl's Triple Jay podcast ( today 29 th Feb ) for the whyfor.
Begins around 15 minutes in.
 
Pretty stupid. Trying to save money by not doing pre ignition checks.

The Nova-C class lander's landing navigation system relied on lasers to estimate speed, direction, and position. Unfortunately, these lasers posed a hazard to the eyes of prelaunch technicians, so the system couldn't be programmed to activate automatically. Instead, a physical switch had to be thrown before launch.

But, it wasn't.

 
Top