- Joined
- 18 September 2008
- Posts
- 4,041
- Reactions
- 1,185
It's amazing what threats of legal action can do. Fox issued a similar retraction a few days ago.
[ICODE<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Right-wing media outlet Newsmax has made a lengthy statement 'clarifying' claims made on-air about alleged US election fraud by voting machine companies Smartmatic and Dominion. <a href="https://t.co/udm8v1gUKv">pic.twitter.com/udm8v1gUKv</a></p>— SBS News (@SBSNews) <a href="">December 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>[/ICODE]
Well they lead re-educated the South Vietnamese. When we pulled out a lot of them were done. You think they floated over on boats for fun.Go and spend time in North Vietnam, they will beg to differ.
@rederob you know how I go on about the media and their pizz poor form in the name of a story and you think i'm obsessed, another classic today. ?
From the article:Seven could face hefty legal bill after wrongfully identifying man over Cleo abduction
A Seven West media platform has apologised for wrongfully identifying an Aboriginal man as the 36-year-old suspect in custody over the alleged abduction of Cleo Smith.www.smh.com.au
A man wrongfully identified by a Seven West media platform as the suspect in custody over the abduction of Cleo Smith could sue the conglomerate for more than $400,000, according to a media lawyer and commercial litigator.
Around midday on Wednesday, 7NEWS.com.au published an article online with two images of a person they wrongfully identified as the 36-year-old Carnarvon man West Australian Police had taken into custody hours earlier.
I like how the "moral authority" fingered the wrong 'person of colour'. Speaks volumes of their credentials and credibility.@rederob you know how I go on about the media and their pizz poor form in the name of a story and you think i'm obsessed, another classic today. ?
From the article:Seven could face hefty legal bill after wrongfully identifying man over Cleo abduction
A Seven West media platform has apologised for wrongfully identifying an Aboriginal man as the 36-year-old suspect in custody over the alleged abduction of Cleo Smith.www.smh.com.au
A man wrongfully identified by a Seven West media platform as the suspect in custody over the abduction of Cleo Smith could sue the conglomerate for more than $400,000, according to a media lawyer and commercial litigator.
Around midday on Wednesday, 7NEWS.com.au published an article online with two images of a person they wrongfully identified as the 36-year-old Carnarvon man West Australian Police had taken into custody hours earlier.
I don't like swearing, but the media in Australia is a FFing Disgrace IMO, they are the ones with no moral compass, yet demand the highest standard of everyone else.I like how the "moral authority" fingered the wrong 'person of colour'. Speaks volumes of their credentials and credibility.
IMO it does beg the question why? When was the last time the media showed any respect to any PM, when interviewing them, or even reporting on them?
Most media interviews I have watched over the years follow the same format, the interviewer asks a question, if the politician isn't giving the answer or doesn't know the answer, the journo just keeps butting in and re asking the question.True, but politicians need to be asked hard questions, and so often the questions get the runaround by media trained politicians who answer questions with their own questions, you know "I think the REAL question is"... blah blah blah. Do such politicians deserve respect ?
Granted that some reporters think that they themselves are the story and the ruder they are they more attention they get so they can be publicised as "the toughest jouno on tv/radio/social media" etc. I can't stand the self promoting journos like that either, but they are usually easy to pick because they have loud voices and barge their way to the front at Press Conferences.
You guys have missed the point.True, but politicians need to be asked hard questions, and so often the questions get the runaround by media trained politicians who answer questions with their own questions, you know "I think the REAL question is"... blah blah blah. Do such politicians deserve respect ?
Granted that some reporters think that they themselves are the story and the ruder they are they more attention they get so they can be publicised as "the toughest jouno on tv/radio/social media" etc. I can't stand the self promoting journos like that either, but they are usually easy to pick because they have loud voices and barge their way to the front at Press Conferences.
Respect has to be earned not assumed. Politicians are essentially our employees and we need to know exactly what they are doing for us and not be fobbed off with non answers.Most media interviews I have watched over the years follow the same format, the interviewer asks a question, if the politician isn't giving the answer or doesn't know the answer, the journo just keeps butting in and re asking the question.
Most questions are contrived in such a way as to provoke controversy, so that it leads to a further story, the journo's these days may as well not bother with the interview and just read out what they want to hear themselves.
Every P.M since Howard has suffered the same fate, the media makes a sport out of tearing them down, it is cheap cover print.
But my point was, it is funny that a journo says a person should show respect to a P.M, when journo's haven't shown respect to a P.M for years.
It's just my opinion, but I'm starting to see what we used to call common courtesy and respect, is becoming a thing of the past and we are heading down to the lowest common denominator.
In theory that is true, however for authority to work, it has to have a degree of underlying built in respect. If it doesn't when a person becomes say a foreman, everyone just tells him to ff of, then once that becomes the norm it is hard to overcome the trend.Respect has to be earned not assumed. Politicians are essentially our employees and we need to know exactly what they are doing for us and not be fobbed off with non answers.
I think she was playing to her base. It's possible she might end up in politics and she is fairly smug with Labor.
She has every right to act how she wants. But given you have access to the PM who seems willing to work with you at some level. It seems a bit of a wasted opportunity to make actual change. A lot of people that hate scomo, would give their right arm to bend the PM's ear. Being able to work together with different political views is essential.
In the end it comes across as an "instagram" moment rather then anything of substance. No one said "Smile". But don't ham it up to play lower end politics.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.