- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,047
- Reactions
- 23,587
The thing is, the case was still active, the ABC only presented one side of the issue and if they presented it in such a way that inferred Lehrmann was guilty of rape it is very poor form.I don't know why it's the ABC being sued.
They always broadcast the National Press Club live and therefore have no control over the content.
Lerhmann should be suing the people who made the comments not the ABC.
They are saying the presentation was in the publics interest, but if that were so, the public had a right to hear both sides.
Like I said, it really is the media right to push a narrative that is on trail IMO.
From a spectators view and reading what was said by a lot of ASF members Lehrmann was assumed guilty by the information the media was presenting to them, so it will be a very interesting case.
IMO the media has been pushing the boundaries for a long time with regard journalistic license and trail by media, it is getting back to the old days of lynch mobs and the very reason laws were brought in to stop it.
When Trump incites a riot and hate speech, it is unacceptable, when the media carries out vendetta against someone it's fine, as long as the mob are onside.
The left has a very strong belief in their own self righteousness, which eventually leads to mob rule IMO.
Just my thoughts.